“marginally significant”

When separating the group of rehabilitated porpoises and comparing the first measurement after arrival in the facility with the last one obtained before release, marginally significant differences (p = 0.052) appear between the first value close to the range of the free-ranging animals and the last value similar to the range found in animals in human care (Figure 3 b).

Conversely, VCDR was significantly lower in APACG patients in the Training ( P = 0.006) and Biomarker Validation sets ( P = 0.048), with a marginally significant trend in the Independent Validation set ( P = 0.052).

Regarding only-child status, a marginally significant difference was observed in ERR ( p = 0.052), with only children reporting a lower mean score compared to non-only children.

However, we found a marginally significant interaction between the behaviour type by the ‘roll over’ test and neuter/spay status of dogs ( F 2,85 = 3.882; p = 0.052).

However, duration of chemotherapy was marginally significant with patients receiving two vs three cycles of IC having slightly different rates of decline ( P = 0.052; Figure 1B ).

In this study, the association between a BMI ≥24 kg/m 2 and the risk of diabetes was marginally significant (P=0.052).

Data from 2006 and 2010 show that the practice of PA also declined, with the exception of handball, which remained stable, and volleyball, which in contrast to other sports had a marginally significant increase (p=0.052).

For valence ratings, a marginally significant main effect of Stimulus Type was observed, F (1, 28) = 4.13, p =.052, η2 = 0.13, with CS+ rated as more negative.

When comparing the scores provided by the LIWC, the results of the test indicated that participants came up with marginally significant more negative words in the rumination ( Mdn = 9.31) than in the control condition ( Mdn = 5.26), U = 331.00, z = −1.94, p = .052, while the negativity scores from SentiWordNet were significantly higher in the rumination condition ( Mdn = 0.08) than in the control condition ( Mdn = .05), U = 303.50, z = −2.33, p = .020.

A 2 (set size) × 2 (exposure time) × 3 (type of test face) repeated-measures ANOVA revealed that the main effect of the exposure time was marginally significant, F (1, 58) = 3.945, p = 0.052, η 2 p = 0.064.

The difference between the depression and HV groups was significant in the number of semantic clusters ( p = 0.04) and marginally significant in the number of phonemic clusters ( p = 0.052) during the category fluency task.

On average, across the four training days, the sham group performed better ( M = 86% (82%, 90%)) than the active group ( M = 81% (77%, 85%)), with a marginally significant difference between the two groups (Welch two-sample t -test for nonequal variance: t 47.27 = 1.99, p = 0.052, two-tailed, d = 0.56).

Mean and standard deviation of each experimental condition are presented in Table 2 . d ’ results The analysis of d ’ results resulted in a marginally significant main effect of ISI, F (1, 41) = 4.019, p = .052, η p 2 = 0.007, showing higher d ’ scores at the 100ms ISI.

This analysis revealed a marginally significant interaction between relationship history and evolutionary information ( F (1,195) = 4.80, p = 0.052, partial η 2 = .018), and a significant main effect of partner history ( F (1.195) = 7.19, p = .008, partial η 2 = .034).

Participants were more likely to provide accept evidence explanations for agents than explain away explanations ( β = 1.48, p < .001) and pattern explanations (marginally significant: β = 0.79, p = .052), compared to objects, and they were less likely to provide explain away explanations for agents than other explanations, compared to objects ( β = -0.95, p = .005).

Effects of vitamin K 2 on atherogenic status Compared to the baseline, a marginally significant reduction was observed in the METS-IR in the vitamin K2 group (mean change from baseline: − 0.80 ± 2.24; p = 0.052).

The effect of gender on body image was marginally significant ( F 1,58 =6.157; P =.052), with a medium effect size (partial η2=0.064), suggesting a slight difference in body image perception between males and females.

I/I genotypes had a marginally significant better RSS than the N/N genotypes ( p = 0.052).

In the T2CTC dataset ( Figure 8 ), a baseline effect of Trop2 expression was found for the bone metastatic condition ( p = 0.04255), with a marginally significant difference in slope between those with bone metastasis and without ( p = 0.052).

There was a marginally significant relationship between higher log 10 NfL levels at time 1 with lower brainstem volume ( r 32 = −0.35, p = 0.052), which remained marginal after controlling for age and sex ( r 28 = −0.35, p = 0.061).

Further, we found weak and marginally significant evidence for increasing stem water content of Q. petraea ( r = 0.33, p = 0.052) and increasing twig water content of P. sylvestris ( r = 0.45, p = 0.063) with increasing exposure to forcing conditions.

Additionally, it’s important to emphasize that the difference between regular and irregular trials in the older group under the slow tempo condition is marginally significant ( p = 0.052).

Further simple effect tests revealed significant differences in the grouping factors in Class 1 ( t (55) = 2.32, p < 0.05, Cohen’s d = 0.67), Class 3 ( t (55) = 2.55, p < 0.05, Cohen’s d = 0.85), Class 4 ( t (55) = 3.10, p < 0.01, Cohen’s d = 1.21), and CS + ( t (55) = 2.72, p < 0.01, Cohen’s d = 1.26), marginally significant differences in Class 2 ( t (55) = 1.99, p = 0.052, Cohen’s d = 0.61), and no significant differences in CS- ( t (55) = 1.53, p > 0.05, Cohen’s d = 0.52).

The variation in prevalence of Rickettsia -positive ticks across all counties was marginally significant (p = 0.052), with a higher prevalence in St.

2 The percentage of Hispanic beneficiaries is marginally significant ( p -value = 0.052) so we exclude it from the discussion.