“marginally significant”

A stratified analysis of tumor clinical stage indicated that the curative effect of CCRT+AC on patients with N 2–3 disease was marginally significant (HR=0.35, 95% CI=0.11–1.06, P =0.052).

While the IES-R was not associated with hypertension ( p = 0.083), the avoidance and intrusion subscales of IES-R3 as well as the avoidance subscale of IES-R6 were significantly ( p = 0.033, 0.027, 0.035, respectively) associated with hypertension, and its association with IES-R6 hyperarousal was marginally significant ( p = 0.052).

Correlation in the baseline group was marginally significant (r s = 0.75, p = 0.052).

A marginally significant difference was also observed when compared with Toothpaste T2 lower ( p = 0.052).

An analysis of MMN and LN enhancements measured 6 months later, at T2, yielded a marginally significant effect of condition in the MMN window ( F (2,32) = 3.23, p = 0.052, η p 2 = 0.168).

Only the indirect effects of identity entrepreneurship by team members via social identity continuity on job satisfaction and loneliness were now marginally significant ( p = 0.052 for the indirect effect on loneliness; p = 0.065 for the indirect effect on job satisfaction).

There were marginally significant differences in learning inefficiency ( p = 0.052, Cohen's d = 0.142) and mobile phone dependence ( p = 0.052, Cohen's d = 0.142) between the two ethnic groups.

Marginally significant metabolites identified in relative abundance analysis for GERD and thyroid dysfunction are in Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Table 2 , respectively, showing that among metabolites with highest marginal significance, pro-pro trended higher with GERD (p = 0.052) while triethylamine trended lower with thyroid dysfunction (p = 0.052). 3.3.

Both of the subgroups with 3 ~ 4 risk alleles and 5 ~ 6 risk alleles showed marginally significant or significant associations with increased KD risk (OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.00–1.74, P = 0.052; OR = 2.93, 95% CI = 1.66–5.17, P < 0.001), and the Cochran-Armitage trend test indicated a significant dose effect with the ORs being increased with increasing numbers of risk alleles ( P trend < 0.001, Table 3 ).

TIV was identified significantly more frequently in MTM-HCC by R2 ( p = 0.001), whereas it was marginally significant for R1 and R3 ( p = 0.052).

The advantage of the independent commission starts to become apparent at the Moderately Effective level, where it has marginally significant positive effect ( p = 0.052) with a coefficient of 1.736.

Beta diversity, assessed at the feature level, showed a marginally significant trend ( p = 0.052) and reached significance at the class level ( p = 0.035).

Post-hoc pairwise comparison revealed marginally significant higher ΔHbO 2 in the symptomatic group when compared to the asymptomatic group in the parietal ROI (p = 0.052; Fig. 2C ).

The interaction between load and language was marginally significant ( F (2, 96) = 3.06, p = .052, η 2 p = .06), with higher accuracy in high load for L1 compared to L2 ( p < .05).

The difference between faculty groups was most evident in the constructed response items where the difference was marginally significant (paired Student’s t test, t = 2.04, P = 0.052, Cohen’s d = 0.245).

The main effect of time change direction was marginally significant, F (1, 23) = 5.76, p = 0.052.

Prior knowledge (interim test accuracy) was not significantly correlated with post attitude ratings ( t ( df = 129) = −0.417, p = 0.677), and the positive link between final knowledge and attitude remained marginally significant when prior knowledge was controlled for ( t ( df = 129) = 1.960, p = 0.052).

Simple effects analyses indicated the effect was significant for happy primes, F (1, 83) = 10.19, p = 0.002, η p 2 = 0.11, and marginally significant for sad primes, F (1, 18) = 3.87, p = 0.052, η p 2 = 0.05.

A marginally significant main effect of groups was also observed [ F (2, 94) = 3.05, p = 0.052, ηp 2 = 0.06], suggesting that musicians, music learners, and non-musicians had different RTs, with a medium effect size.

The interaction between ethnicity of the stimuli used and internet frequency was marginally significant, F(2,83) = 3.001, p = 0.052, suggesting that masculinity preferences for the three types of male faces differed depending on the amount of internet used (Fig. 3 ).

The elasticity of the interaction term in small cities was also negative and marginally significant (ε = −1.4133, P = 0.052 for the fixed effect model; ε = −0.9690, P = 0.065 for the random effect model).

A marginally significant post hoc test showed greater Week 4 step counts in the individual message group than in the automated group (17.7 and 14.0 steps/min, respectively; p = 0.052).

Self‐control showed significant positive correlations with RMSSD, pNN50, and HF (0.145 ≤ r s ≤ 0.161), while conscientiousness showed a marginally significant correlation with HF ( r = 0.135, p = 0.052) and significant positive correlations with RMSSD ( r = 0.159, p = 0.022) and pNN50 ( r = 0.166, p = 0.017).

The strength of association between obesity and multiple sex partners, which was marginally significant (OR = 1.17, P = 0.052) in Table 2 , decreased and was no longer significant (OR = 1.02, P = 0.81). 4.

The interaction between Condition and Group was marginally significant, F (1, 39) = 4.00, p = .052, η p 2 = .09.