The difference in change scores between groups with different postbaseline treatment status was marginally significant ( P =0.052).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
Math talk significantly predicted average latency scores, B = −49.63, SE = 16.21, p = .003, and there was a marginally significant effect for average attachment and friendship scores, B = −2.59, SE = 1.31, p = .052.
The strength of association between obesity and multiple sex partners, which was marginally significant (OR = 1.17, P = 0.052) in Table 2 , decreased and was no longer significant (OR = 1.02, P = 0.81). 4.
Finally, there was a marginally significant group × time interaction for the TEIQue, t = 1.95 , p = 0.052 , f 2 = 0.01, but these scores on the TEIQue did not significantly differ from baseline at Time 3, t = 1.57, p = 0.123, d = 0.21.
The Test x PA1 interaction was marginally significant, γ = -.603, p = .052.
This analysis revealed a marginally significant interaction between relationship history and evolutionary information ( F (1,195) = 4.80, p = 0.052, partial η 2 = .018), and a significant main effect of partner history ( F (1.195) = 7.19, p = .008, partial η 2 = .034).
Nevertheless, a marginally significant effect of social influence was found also in the Het Group ( β = 0.02 , χ 2 (1) = 3.78, P = 0.052).
found that the effect of vitamin C was not significant on left ventricular circumferential and longitudinal strain, which are measures of systolic function, whereas there was a marginally significant effect of vitamin C on the decrease in the post-peak exercise measurement of circumferential strain ( P = 0.052) ( 52 ).
Endorser image congruence positively predicts intention to gamble responsibly (RG Intention), with a marginally significant effect ( b = 0.11, se = 0.05, p = 0.052), as shown in the RG Intention Model 1 testing results.
Sleep quality was the only significant predictor of incubus hallucination frequency, although dissociative experiences was a marginally significant predictor; P = 0.052 (Fig. 3 c).
Among men, null associations were observed between all anthropometric measures with incident DN in the multivariate analysis although the 3 rd quartile of WHtR showed marginally significant results ( P = 0.052).
There was a marginally significant positive relationship between the biomass of A. syriaca per site and the number of “complete” pollinia on honeybee individuals ( t 159 = 2.748, p = .052; Figure 2 b), as well as a significant relationship with the number of corpusculum only that were attached per honeybee ( t 159 = 5.190, p < .001; Figure 2 d), the proportion of pollinia vectored ( t 159 = 6.047, p < .001) (Figure 2 f), and the total (pollinia + corpusculum only) ( t 159 = 4.695, p = .116).
A marginally significant post hoc test showed greater Week 4 step counts in the individual message group than in the automated group (17.7 and 14.0 steps/min, respectively; p = 0.052).
In univariate analysis, all family members sleeping regularly under bed net was marginally significant (P = 0.052).
Attitude: preparedness to screen Agreement with the AAS screening incentive was significantly positively associated with lower volume of patients attending (p = 0.008), lower number of deliveries to perform (p = 0.045), having a peer that is a victim of partner abuse (p = 0.012), and a history of having received or pursued any kind of education or information on intimate partner violence (p = 0.019), and marginally significant associated with hospital type (p = 0.052).
There was a marginally significant difference in the proportion of severe visual loss with a visual acuity of 20 / 200 or less at the final visit among ON subgroups ( p = 0.052).
The difference in performance between consistent and inconsistent trials was marginally significant when the task was to report the content of their own perspective, t (32) = 2.01, p = .052, d = 0.18.
3 ), but only showed a marginally significant difference between the apple and banana substrates (GLM: χ 2 1,495 = 3.78, P = 0.052), and no effect of the interaction between resource type and frequency (GLM: χ 2 1,495 = 3.65, P = 0.06; Fig. 3 ).
A post-hoc analysis was marginally significant (p = .052), and became significant if the 6-month completers were omitted from the analysis (3-year completers differed from the other groups).
Furthermore, the correlation between letter knowledge and WD1 within the DHH group was marginally significant ( p = .052), indicating a possible relation between kindergarten letter knowledge and word decoding already from the first measurement.
In addition, we found a marginally significant increase in support for the outgroup (unlimited vs. control, p = 0.052; unlimited vs. limited, p = 0.075) and no significant difference in support for the ingroup (unlimited vs. control, p = 0.72; unlimited vs. limited, p = 0.42).
However, a marginally significant difference was found between treatments (F (1,28) = 4.11, p = 0.052), and a significant one within treatments (F (1,28) = 7.73, p = 0.01).
There was only a marginally significant effect on the AUC for glucose between the HFC and LFC (t 12 = 2.160 p = 0.052; Fig. 2H ).
The main effect of the prime-target hemifield was marginally significant, F (1, 10) = 4.85, p = 0.052.
In the post-shortage phase, the decreasing trend appeared to persist, with a marginally significant slope change (coefficient = −13.2, p = 0.052), which may suggest a potential residual effect on submission practices even after the supply issue had been resolved.