“marginally significant”

Step 2 led to a marginally significant increase in the variance explained, ΔF (1, 72) = 3.90, p = 0.052.

Being 81–85 versus≤70 years was marginally significant ( p = 0.052).

The N effect was marginally significant, b = .57, z = 1.94, p = .052, CI [−.005, 1.14], OR = 1.77.

There were a significant higher percentage of participants who tested positive for MAU with A1C ≥ 53 mmol/m ( p = 0.032), hypertension ( p = 0.007) and marginally significant for BMI ( p = 0.052) as compared to those with normal albuminuria.

2.927) was marginally significant ( P ≈ 0.052) (Table S20), whereas Mature leaf/Old leaf/Root showed the same trend but did not reach significance ( P > 0.05) (Table S20), indicating a tendency toward higher TCP expression in cultivated materials in actively growing tissues within the compiled dataset.

The interaction between load and language was marginally significant ( F (2, 96) = 3.06, p = .052, η 2 p = .06), with higher accuracy in high load for L1 compared to L2 ( p < .05).

on, median) was 2·73 (0·30, 2·73) log 10 c.f.u./ml in G1 (no samples were positive in G2). Results of mathematical and statistical modeling In the univariate analysis, the effect of environmental contamination level significantly influenced the transmission rate ( P = 0·0002), the group effect was marginally significant ( P = 0·052) and the strain effect was not significant.

No significant correlation was found with the entire data set and there was only a marginally significant correlation ( r = 0.161, p = 0.052) for protein supplements.

Under the sentence conditions, an rANOVA with these two factors on the accuracy showed significant main effects of scrambling and topicalization [scrambling, F (1,16) = 12, p = 0.0036; topicalization, F (1,16) = 9.5, p = 0.0072], and an interaction between these factors was marginally significant [ F (1,16) = 4.4, p = 0.052].

There are marginally significant differences in the median density of marks between the recipient and the handle segments, for the back (Mann−Whitney U = 14, exact p = 0.052) but not for the front side (Mann−Whitney U = 26, exact p = 0.361), with the recipient having the higher average density of marks on both sides of the spoon. 2) The scatterplot of mark densities of merged and unmerged quadrants (the second method of building observation units) (Plot B in Fig 12 ) suggests that there is no correlation between the front and the back mark density (r = -0.02, p = 0.454, N = 35).

The cup-to-disc ratio exhibited a marginally significant difference, with p = 0.052, suggesting a potential difference that approaches statistical significance.

Distance per minute showed a marginally significant interaction between product and match week ( p = 0.052; η 2 p = 0.064, moderate effect size).

This effect was absent in the OFA (F (1,25) = 2.4, p = 0.13), with a marginally significant interaction (F (1,24) = 4.2, p = 0.052) between region (FFA vs.

The frequency of dragging was explained by a marginally significant species × treatment interaction term (F 1, 75 = 3.89, p = 0.052; table 2c ).

The Observed species index included 8 studies (k = 8, N = 2302) and exhibited a marginally significant increase associated with exercise (g = 0.19, 95% CI: −0.002–0.39, P = 0.052), with low between-study heterogeneity ( I 2 = 0%).

found that the effect of vitamin C was not significant on left ventricular circumferential and longitudinal strain, which are measures of systolic function, whereas there was a marginally significant effect of vitamin C on the decrease in the post-peak exercise measurement of circumferential strain ( P = 0.052) ( 52 ).

A marginally significant difference was found for eosinophils ( p = 0.052), with higher levels being detected in APA.

In this case, only item 32 showed a marginally significant correlation ( r = 0.12, p = 0.052) with the wish to speak with a psychologist about these issues, indicating that the higher the frequency of thinking about developing cancer, the higher the need to speak with a psychologist (see Table S2.33PSY5a in the Supplementary Material for more details).

The number of SP moments at 6 months was significantly associated with motor (estimate = 2.4; SE = 0.9; p = 0.007) and marginally significant with cognitive scores (estimate = 1.9; SE = 1.0; p = 0.052) at 18 months.

In the T2CTC dataset ( Figure 8 ), a baseline effect of Trop2 expression was found for the bone metastatic condition ( p = 0.04255), with a marginally significant difference in slope between those with bone metastasis and without ( p = 0.052).

Dorfbach: Z = 3.34, P = 0.008; the comparison between Kiese and Dorfbach was marginally significant: Z = 2.72, P = 0.052).

The main effect of group was marginally significant ( F = 3.965, p = 0.052, η 2 p = 0.068).

The SD of head tilt angle showed a marginally significant difference across conditions ( F (1.364, 19.093) = 3.903, p =.052, η p 2 = 0.536).

Using branch-site model A with the Glires branch (see Figure S7B for labeling) as foreground lineage in the branch-site test of positive selection (null model ω 2 = 1 fixed) LRT provided marginally significant support ( P = 0.052) for 2 positively selected sites with Bayes empirical Bayes (BEB) probability above 0.7 ( Table 2 ).

A marginally significant increase in the stress index was observed during the Stroop condition compared to baseline (Wilk's Lambda = 0.84, F [2,34] = 3.236, p = 0.052, η2 = 0.16), suggesting a moderate effect size.