Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.0531.1× alphagold
Pairwise comparisons revealed the largest significant differences between AF—AL and AF—AP ( p = 0.009 for both), followed by AA—AF ( p = 0.019) and AA—AP ( p = 0.040); a marginally significant difference between AA—AL ( p = 0.053); and a close association between AL and AP ( p = 0.068); however, after correction for multiple sampling, differences were significant only for the AF—AL and AF—AP comparisons.
marginally significantp = 0.0531.1× alphagold
Our second analysis focusing on anemone survival revealed a significant decline in anemone survival in 2023-2024 (Firth logistic regression: β = –8.44 ± 1.91, p < 0.0001; Supplementary Table 2 ), and a marginally significant decline in anemone survival with increasing anemonefish group size (Firth logistic regression: β = –1.20 ± 0.69, p = 0.053; Supplementary Table 3 ).
marginally significantp = 0.0531.1× alphagold
There were marginally significant associations between TASC-r total score ( B = − 0.66, SE = 0.27 , t (39) = − 2.48, adjusted p = 0.053) and TASC-r task subscale score ( B = − 1.04, SE = 0.38 , t (39) = − 2.76, adjusted p = 0.053) predicting decreased CL-ARI in the next rating.
marginally significantp = 0.0531.1× alphagold
By regressing out the effects of age, sex, education, and TIV, we found that for the N-to-M progression, sNC from BABRI presented a marginally significant positive correlation between the GM density of the superior temporal gyrus and that of the hippocampus ( r = 0.400, p = 0.053), while this correlation disappeared in pNC ( r = 0.218, p = 0.455) in the BABRI sample.
marginally significantp = 0.0531.1× alphagold
Age emerged as a significant factor, with individuals aged 26-35 exhibiting a noteworthy increase in the odds of experiencing moderate to severe symptoms of ETD (Exp(B) = 3.899, p = 0.001), while those aged 36-45 showed a marginally significant increase (Exp(B) = 2.626, p = 0.053), in comparison to the reference group (18-25 years).