Pairwise comparisons revealed the largest significant differences between AF—AL and AF—AP ( p = 0.009 for both), followed by AA—AF ( p = 0.019) and AA—AP ( p = 0.040); a marginally significant difference between AA—AL ( p = 0.053); and a close association between AL and AP ( p = 0.068); however, after correction for multiple sampling, differences were significant only for the AF—AL and AF—AP comparisons.
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
However, whereas the taxon and interaction effects are marginally significant ( anova , F 8, 23 =2.34, P =0.053), the high number of parameters leads to its rejection according to AIC C ( Table 2 ).
The V30 was marginally significant ( p = 0.053).
For the channels placed over the somatosensory cortex, a marginally significant association was found in channel 2, r =−0.40, P = 0.053, such that infants whose mothers were less sensitive tended to present a higher response peak in HbO 2 to the affective touch condition ( Figure 2 ).
For Conscientiousness, the direct effect on attitudes toward climate change was found to be marginally significant, b = 0.088, SE = 0.045, z = 1.939, p = 0.053, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) ranging from 0.00096 to 0.1770.
One marginally significant correlation was found between itching at Time 0 and false alarm rates ( r [ 14 ] = 0.53, p = 0.053), suggesting that participants in the active condition may have been distracted by higher initial itching sensations than those in the sham condition.
The effect of adaptation type was marginally significant (F(3,9) = 3.76, p = 0.053).
An unpaired t -test showed the difference to be marginally significant [ t (42) = 1.993, p = 0.053], but the associated Bayes factor analysis (see “ Statistics ”) suggested no evidence against the null hypothesis (of zero age difference; BF 10 = 1.1).
Our second analysis focusing on anemone survival revealed a significant decline in anemone survival in 2023-2024 (Firth logistic regression: β = –8.44 ± 1.91, p < 0.0001; Supplementary Table 2 ), and a marginally significant decline in anemone survival with increasing anemonefish group size (Firth logistic regression: β = –1.20 ± 0.69, p = 0.053; Supplementary Table 3 ).
A chi-square analysis was performed and the effect was marginally significant, indicating increased forgetting over time [χ 2 (1) = 3.75, p = 0.053; Cramer’s φ = 0.31].
This difference was marginally significant, t (14) = 2.11, p = 0.053.
Mann-Whitney U test between Groups 2 and 3 (Group 1 was bypassed due to small sample size) showed a marginally significant difference in BLL value changes from baseline (p = 0.053).
Planning one or more strategies was significantly associated with improved adherence; early DPP adherence was marginally significant (p=0.053) as a predictor of higher DPPOS adherence in this model.
In the resulting model, the density of voles in year t − 1 became marginally significant (GLMM, coefficient estimate = 0.12, CI: 0.00 – 0.25, p = .053).
No significant correlations were revealed between L2 Proficiency and probabilities assigned to the blue box in the Embodied condition (rho = .12, p = .23), though the result was marginally significant for the red box (rho = −.18, p = .053), in favour of a reduced egocentricity with greater bilingualism.
Although the interaction between group and sentence type was marginally significant ( p = 0.053, χ 2 = 18.143, R 2 = 0.20), the effect of group was not significant for any of the sentence types.
There were marginally significant associations between TASC-r total score ( B = − 0.66, SE = 0.27 , t (39) = − 2.48, adjusted p = 0.053) and TASC-r task subscale score ( B = − 1.04, SE = 0.38 , t (39) = − 2.76, adjusted p = 0.053) predicting decreased CL-ARI in the next rating.
Among the native species, biomass ranked big bluestem > switchgrass > little bluestem at first harvest and the size difference between the two bluestems was marginally significant (Tukey HSD p = 0.053).
The global sex-by-covariate interaction test was marginally significant (χ2 (13) =22.15; p=0.053), which suggests the presence of possible sex differences in the associations.
For male left hand 2D:4D there was a marginally significant relationship with percent of male deaths ( B = 1122.12, SE B = 527.77, beta = 0.47, p = .053) and no relationship for female left hand 2D:4D ( B = 579.00, SE B = 375.07, beta = 0.34, p = .15). 4.
In this subtest, only CBS-AD was different from controls ( p = 0.044) and a marginally significant difference was found for CBS-non-AD ( p = 0.053).
Differences in fatigue severity over time were marginally significant ( p = 0.053) and in favor of the intervention group (Fig. 3 ).
By regressing out the effects of age, sex, education, and TIV, we found that for the N-to-M progression, sNC from BABRI presented a marginally significant positive correlation between the GM density of the superior temporal gyrus and that of the hippocampus ( r = 0.400, p = 0.053), while this correlation disappeared in pNC ( r = 0.218, p = 0.455) in the BABRI sample.
Age emerged as a significant factor, with individuals aged 26-35 exhibiting a noteworthy increase in the odds of experiencing moderate to severe symptoms of ETD (Exp(B) = 3.899, p = 0.001), while those aged 36-45 showed a marginally significant increase (Exp(B) = 2.626, p = 0.053), in comparison to the reference group (18-25 years).
A significant lower ALB and marginally significant lower T-CHO ( p = 0.053) levels were also evident in aged mice in this study, other than muscle weakness, body fat loss, and body fluid accumulation conditions.