“marginally significant”

There was a marginally significant trend toward a lower atelectasis rate in Group T (OR = 0.059, 95% CI: 0.003–1.032, P = .053).

Post-hoc analysis showed a significant difference between the control and the severe aphasia group (p < 0.001) and a marginally significant difference between the control and the moderate aphasia group (p = 0.053).

Hence, a trend to a protective effect in human patients was observed for both compounds, although the decreased risk observed was marginally significant only for VPA ( p = 0.053).

This association was marginally significant among those with high birth weight (P = 0.053).

However, results on the Control group showed a significant moderate negative correlation r = −0.579, p = 0.048 between change in positive affect and RT change for the detection of anger, and a marginally significant negative correlation (moderate), r = −0.570, p = 0.053 between change in positive affect and RT change for the detection of happiness.

VC in the two groups was 0.07 and marginally significant ( P = 0.053) [ Table 4 ].

Although age was a marginally significant predictor in phase 1 (p-value = 0.053) and not related in phase 2 (p-value = 0.985), a one-year increase in the SW's age was significantly associated with a 5% [OR = 0.95 (95% CI 0.93–0.98, p-value = 0.001)] decrease in the odds of supplying condomless-sex.

The analyses revealed a marginally significant negative relationship between optimism subscale and the Delta for the Jackson Symptom Score in the total sample ( r = −0.134, p = 0.053).

The intercept was marginally significant ( p =.053), consistent with numerically near-chance performance (~53.7%) at SOA = 0 ms.

This relationship was statistically significant for the highly body-oriented group (Estimate = −1.00, SE = 0.42, p = .017), marginally significant for the moderately body-oriented group (Estimate = −0.78, SE = 0.40, p = .053), and suggestive, though not statistically significant, for the buttocks-oriented group (Estimate = −0.74, SE = 0.47, p = .113).

5 Using the mean TEPR over the entire encoding phase, not just the second half where the difference between groups was most pronounced, still shows a marginally significant correlation with performance (R = 0.44; p = 0.053). 6 Latencies to (either of) the match and nonmatch cards at the start of the encoding phase averaged 206 ms (SD = 115 ms).

We also found a marginally significant association between male gender and having a discussion with a doctor about LCS ( P = 0.053; Table 2 ).

For high job strain, the interaction was marginally significant ( p = 0.053) and there was a difference in estimated marginal mean effects for participants who reported high depressive symptomatology at both T1 and T2 ( β [95% CI]: 3.42 [0.64, 6.20], p = 0.016) compared with neither T1 nor T2, yet not for either T1 or T2 (0.32 [−2.14, 2.77], p = 0.800) compared with neither T1 nor T2 (Table 2 ; Figure 4 ); thus, there was evidence of effect modification.

4 , Table 2 ), and the INOC×CO2 interaction effect was marginally significant ( P =0.053).

Date of sampling was not significantly related to wing length increment ( t = 0.07, P = 0.97), whereas age of nestling is marginally significant in the model ( t = −1.98, P = 0.053).

Without multiple test correction, one additional hospital with high PWD was found to be marginally significant (p=0.053).

Testing strategies differed by quarantine measures to marginally significant ( p = 0.053) extent ( Table 2 ).

The difference between CST and UST rats in corticosterone levels immediately after the 8 th session was marginally significant (p = 0.053).

Relative to the reference group (Class 4), individuals in Class 1 ( p < 0.001) and Class 2 ( p = 0.010) exhibit significantly higher odds of elevated suicide risk, whereas those in Class 3 show a marginally significant increase ( p = 0.053).

Empowerment showed marginally significant explanation of sun behaviour (β = 0.08, p = 0.053), while the benefits of tanning proved to be the variable with second strongest impact on sun behaviour (β = 0.281 and p < 0.001).

7 , Table 2 ), and exhibited marginally significant differences between groups in terms of the (NpD-NpV) pattern expression (accuracy=61 ± 5%, P = 0.053) 56 .

There was a marginally significant overall dose effect ( p = 0.053) for the number of errors for Path A, with only the high dose level marginally significant ( p = 0.060; Dunnett’s).

Men in the highest tertile of zinc intake were at higher risk of PC, (Odds ratio (OR): 1.27; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00–1.61), with a marginally significant trend ( p = 0.053).

The correlation for negative affect remained marginally significant (ΔNA: r = -.317, p = .053; n = 38).

Paired samples t -tests revealed that the discrimination effect was only significant in the LF region [ t (19) = 3.49, p = 0.002], and marginally significant in the RF region [ t (19) = 2.07, p = 0.053].