“marginally significant”

For Conscientiousness, the direct effect on attitudes toward climate change was found to be marginally significant, b = 0.088, SE = 0.045, z = 1.939, p = 0.053, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) ranging from 0.00096 to 0.1770.

Bilateral lesion was a marginally significant factor related to dysphagia ( P = 0.053).

GG genotype female subjects demonstrated more pronounced decreases in weight and BMI changes post-training ( p < 0.05), with body fat showing a marginally significant trend ( p = 0.053).

Repeated-measures ANOVA on the LPP component produced a significant main effect of electrode distribution [ F (2,41) = 8.593, p < 0.05, η 2 = 0.1701], stimulus [ F (1,42) = 89.104, p < 0.05, η 2 = 0.680] and a marginally significant main effect of competitive intensity [ F (2,42) = 3.155, p = 0.053, η 2 = 0.131] (see Tables 2 , 3 ).

The mean MUAC was 24.8 cm (SD = 2.64) and the proportion of participants with poor nutritional status was higher among those with inadequate dietary diversity (25.7% vs 19.1%), which was a marginally significant ( p = 0.053) difference ( Table 3 ).

The similar distribution of these characteristics between the two groups, reflected in the p-values (all above 0.05 except for a marginally significant difference in ER status with p=0.053), supports the external validity of the findings derived from this dataset.

The within-family effect was not significant averaging across zygosity (beta = -0.126, p = 0.303), but there was a marginally significant interaction of the within effect by zygosity (beta = 0.468, p = 0.053), such that there is a marginally significant within effect for MZ pairs (simple effect beta = -0.354, p = 0.055) but not DZ pairs (simple effect beta = 0.114, p = 0.469).

Neither the Wanting scale nor the Liking scale added significantly to the prediction of a change in SPS-R severity from T1 to T2 (although, the prediction of the Wanting scale was marginally significant, p = 0.053).

For the Control condition, laterality effect was marginally significant, F(2,38) = 3.2, p = 0.053.

When categorized by quartiles, compared with Q1, Q4 of RDW was associated with a 2.31-fold increased risk (HR = 2.31, 95%CI: 1.08–4.95, p = 0.032) in the unadjusted model, which remained marginally significant after full adjustment (HR = 2.12, 95%CI: 0.99–4.54, p = 0.053).

Insomnia was significantly predicted by several covariates, including negative associations with age (β = −0.033, p = 0.037), current living situation (β = −0.098, p < 0.001), income level (β = −0.040, p = 0.008), and employment status (β = −0.093, p < 0.001), as well as positive associations with number of live births (marginally significant, β = 0.036, p = 0.053), expected mode of delivery (β = 0.063, p = 0.013), and living arrangements (“who do you live with?”) (β = 0.094, p < 0.001); other covariates (gestational age, pregnancy status, marital status, geographical location, education attainment, and residential area) showed no significant effects.

Respondents who had challenges in hanging were less likely to use the LLIN compared to those who did not experience challenges while hanging bed nets, but this association was marginally significant (OR=0.59 95% CI: 0.35, 1.01, p=0.053), and these results are shown in Table 2 .

For both models, male patients had lower GDS scores than female patients (β = −1.98, p < 0.01—first model; β = −1.93, p = 0.003—second model); there were no significant effects for education levels, and pension had a negative association with GDS scores, which was marginally significant (β = −0.0005, p = 0.053).

The results are provided in Table 7 , and show that both for the LRST and the two-pager, respectively, a significant [ F (7,207) = 4.252, p < 0.001] and marginally significant regression weight [ F (7,199) = 2.029, p = 0.053] was found.

9.2% respectively). Oncological outcomes (OS, CSS) In stage II prostate cancer, significantly better OS is observed in the HIFU group compared with the RT group before IPTW adjustment ( p = 0.001), but the significance is marginally significant after IPTW adjustment ( p = 0.053).

There was a marginally significant effect of ratio, F (2, 104) = 3.02, p = 0.053, The Developing Mental Number Line: Does Its Directionality Relate to 5- to 7-Year-Old Children’s Mathematical Abilities? = 0.055, and a linear contrast analysis revealed a statistically significant linear trend, F (1, 55) = 4.45, p = 0.040, η p 2 = 0.079, such that performance improved as ratio decreased (e.g., better performance for a ratio of 4:7 than 4:5), as expected.

The extent of overestimation in both functional and phylogenetic β diversity increased significantly with differences in island area ( Δβ F , P <0.05, and Δβ P , P <0.001), whereas overestimation in taxonomic β diversity ( Δβ T ) was marginally significant ( P =0.053) (Supplementary Table S5).

Results Our finding showed that serum triglycerides (TG) (n=5, WMD -38.50 mg/dL, 95% confidence interval [CI] -61.68 to -15.31; P=0.001) and total cholesterol (TC) (n=4, WMD -18.70 mg/dL, 95%CI -34.85 to -2.53; P=0.023) decrease following diet intervention along with marginally significant weight reduction (n=5, WMD -3.61 mg/dL, 95%CI -7.25 to 0.04; P=0.053).

In the children's group, the intervention significantly increased scores for MVPA ( t = −2.11, df = 23, and p < 0.05) and playing together (marginally significant effect: Z = 1.93; p = 0.053) and significantly decreased scores for self-esteem of physical fitness ( Z = 2.21; p < 0.05).

ANOVA was run in R and revealed that these differences were marginally significant ( p = 0.053) ( Figure 8 ).

Subgroup analyses Subgroup analyses revealed significant effect modification by episode status (interaction p = 0.045) and marginally significant interactions for illness duration ( P = 0.053), gender ( p = 0.056), and age ( p = 0.057).

Fish oil supplement use had a marginally significant association with the risk of dementia after further adjustment for other supplements such as vitamins and minerals ( P = 0.053).

For the channels placed over the somatosensory cortex, a marginally significant association was found in channel 2, r =−0.40, P = 0.053, such that infants whose mothers were less sensitive tended to present a higher response peak in HbO 2 to the affective touch condition ( Figure 2 ).

Additionally, higher monthly income exhibited a marginally significant positive association (B = 0.196, p = 0.053, Exp(B) = 1.217, 95%CI [0.998, 1.484]), suggesting that individuals with higher incomes were slightly more likely to consider facial cosmetic surgery.

For the precuneus, the other side was significant too (RD, r = 0.144, p = 0.038), while for the IFG, the same side was marginally significant for RD, as well ( r = 0.137, p = 0.053).