“marginally significant”

We found significant differences for the PASAT [ F (2,18) = 5.77, p = 0.012] with a post hoc pairwise comparison using the Bonferroni correction showing a marginally significant improvement in PASAT scores in the methylphenidate condition as compared to the baseline condition (43.7 ± 4.0 vs. 38.7 ± 4.9, respectively, p = 0.053).

One marginally significant correlation was found between itching at Time 0 and false alarm rates ( r [ 14 ] = 0.53, p = 0.053), suggesting that participants in the active condition may have been distracted by higher initial itching sensations than those in the sham condition.

Bilateral lesion was a marginally significant factor related to dysphagia ( P = 0.053).

MGMT methylation had a marginally significant improvement in OS (HR = 0.43, 0.18–1.01, p = 0.053).

There was marginally significant evidence for short term extraneous variation between fortnights within months (EPV = 0.54, SE = 0.33, P = 0.053).

According to multivariate test statistics, there was a marginally significant interaction effect between time and condition ( p = .053).

The intercept was marginally significant ( p =.053), consistent with numerically near-chance performance (~53.7%) at SOA = 0 ms.

The interaction of icon type × cognitive level had a marginally significant effect on the FD ( p = 0.053).

Repeated-measures ANOVA on the LPP component produced a significant main effect of electrode distribution [ F (2,41) = 8.593, p < 0.05, η 2 = 0.1701], stimulus [ F (1,42) = 89.104, p < 0.05, η 2 = 0.680] and a marginally significant main effect of competitive intensity [ F (2,42) = 3.155, p = 0.053, η 2 = 0.131] (see Tables 2 , 3 ).

Co-variation of group-differences in the two measurements was also significant for the sibling-patient comparison ( r = −0.54, p < .001), and marginally significant for the control-sibling comparison ( r = −0.26, p = .053).

The control group showed a similar tendency to the reward group: for the pretest, the participants showed a significant (from day 1 to day 2, p < 0.001) or marginally significant increase (from day 2 to day 3, p = 0.053) over the 3 days; for the posttest, the participants showed a significant increase from day to day.

However, we do see marginally significant preplay of the stem during REST1, an effect consistent with de novo preplay (area under the curve analysis of stem preplay vs shuffle in REST1: p = 0.053).

The univariate tests of between-subjects effects revealed a marginally significant effect of role ( F (1, 383) = 3.772, p = .053, n 2 p = .010) and significant interaction between phase and role ( F (2, 383) = 3.257, p = .040, n 2 p = .017) for the number of blinks (see Fig. 2 a).

Post-hoc tests revealed significant decreases from Pre-ECT ( M Pre-ECT =30.71, SD Pre-ECT =7.45) to T0, T1, and T2 ( M T0 =18.07, SD T0 =10.22, M T1 =13.43, SD T1 =9.91, M T2 =12.86 SD T2 =13.03), p <0.001, as well as T0 to T2 ( p =0.044) and a marginally significant decrease from T0 to T1 ( p =0.053) in clinician-rated depression severity.

Subgroup analyses Subgroup analyses revealed significant effect modification by episode status (interaction p = 0.045) and marginally significant interactions for illness duration ( P = 0.053), gender ( p = 0.056), and age ( p = 0.057).

In this analysis, carboplatin dose was a marginally significant factor (odds ratio, 2.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.99–4.29; p = 0.053).

In repeated 3 × 3 ANOVA, the sham vs standard tDCS contrast was significant, but only slightly below 0.05 threshold ( F (1, 17) = 4.544, p = 0.048, η p 2 = 0.211), while sham vs otDCS contrast was of similar effect size but marginally significant ( F (1, 17) = 4.319, p = 0.053, η p 2 = 0.203).

The main effect of RT on accuracy was significant in the 20 min condition (χ 2 = 5.66, edf = 1.00, p = 0.017) and marginally significant in the 10 min condition (χ 2 = 6.15, edf = 1.75, p = 0.053), indicating that slower RTs were associated with a lower accuracy on average; there was no main effect for the Unlimited time condition (χ 2 = 1.82, edf = 1.34, p = 0.318).

Without multiple test correction, one additional hospital with high PWD was found to be marginally significant (p=0.053).

On the other hand, vital-surgical residents reported significantly lower QOL, higher stress, and lower satisfaction scores than vital-medical or other-surgical residents (except for a marginally significant difference in satisfaction compared with the vital-medical group, P = 0.053), even though there was no significant difference in perceived weekly work hours.

A marginally significant increase in risk was observed in female patients ( P = 0.053) and IDH-wildtype patients ( P = 0.060).

The interaction between COVID period and minority-serving hospitals was marginally significant ( p = 0.053), suggesting a subtle but meaningful decline in sentiment among hospitals serving higher-minority populations during the pandemic.

Additionally, a marginally significant correlation was observed between the normalized power in the beta-1 band over the contralesional hemisphere and FMA-UE scores (r = 0.417, p = 0.053).

We found no significant association between iron supplementation (37/98 or 37.8%) and maternal sTfR concentrations (p = 0.95) or with the combined sTfR-ferritin indexes following log transformation (p = 0.20 to 0.97), while there was a marginally significant association between serum ferritin concentrations and supplemental iron intake (p = 0.053).

We also found a marginally significant association between male gender and having a discussion with a doctor about LCS ( P = 0.053; Table 2 ).