“marginally significant”

After adjusting for potential confounding factors, the positive correlation between carbohydrate intake and ALT in the HC group remained marginally significant ( P = .053) ( Figure 1d ).

The participants’ assessments of the level of Japanese art were slightly lower than those of the general Japanese public in the crude analysis, and the difference was marginally significant ( p = .053) after statistical adjustments were made for age, gender, and education.

Repeated-measures ANOVA on the LPP component produced a significant main effect of electrode distribution [ F (2,41) = 8.593, p < 0.05, η 2 = 0.1701], stimulus [ F (1,42) = 89.104, p < 0.05, η 2 = 0.680] and a marginally significant main effect of competitive intensity [ F (2,42) = 3.155, p = 0.053, η 2 = 0.131] (see Tables 2 , 3 ).

After dose escalation, group A (400mg TID) had marginally significant further increase in 12-hour mean DBP (p=0.053) but group B (600mg BID) did not achieve statistically significant increases (p=0.25).

The correlation for negative affect remained marginally significant (ΔNA: r = -.317, p = .053; n = 38).

Post hoc analyses showed a reduction in evidence following across actions that was significant in children ( b = −1.22, SE = 0.14, z = −8.74, p < 0.001) and dogs ( b = −0.30, SE = 0.14, z = −2.13, p = 0.033), and marginally significant in pigs ( b = −0.27, SE = 0.14, z = −1.93, p = 0.053).

Bilateral lesion was a marginally significant factor related to dysphagia ( P = 0.053).

There was a marginally significant interaction between sex and 2D:4D ratio for the empathy variable, F (1, 524) = 3.78, p = 0.053, η 2 p = 0.01, such that males with higher digit ratios had lower empathy scores than males with lower digit ratios, F (1, 279) = 7.51, p = 0.007, η 2 p = 0.03, whereas females did not differ in empathy as a function of digit ratio, F (1, 244) = 0.01, p = 0.93, η 2 p < 0.001 (see Fig. 3 ).

37.5%); the difference was marginally significant ( P = 0.053).

More precisely, the contrast “Trained > Untrained” revealed a cluster localized to the left middle occipital gyrus (MNI coordinates of the peak voxel: x = −40, y = −78, z = 32 mm, T = 6.86, K E = 1,256), which was marginally significant at peak-level (FWE-corrected, p > 0.053, n.s.).

With increased storage time, VA exhibited a tendency (p = 0.096) for decreased retention in vitamin premixes, but VA exhibited a tendency (p = 0.076) and VB 5 was marginally significant (p = 0.053) for decreased retention during extended storage time in vitamin premixes containing choline chloride.

In the resulting model, the density of voles in year t − 1 became marginally significant (GLMM, coefficient estimate = 0.12, CI: 0.00 – 0.25, p = .053).

There was a marginally significant difference in the adequate protection rates for the fold type before and during intubation using a direct laryngoscope ( P = 0.053) ( Figure 3 ). 3.4.

The effect of adaptation type was marginally significant (F(3,9) = 3.76, p = 0.053).

Processing speed demonstrated a marginally significant linear improvement ( n = 39, β = 0.31, p = 0.053; Fig. 2 B).

The results in Study 2 found marginally significant group differences in test scores ( F (1,37) = 6.602, p = 0.053, η 2 = 0.097); the total score of the control group (46.69 ± 1.28) was higher than that of the competition group (43.19 ± 1.19).

Suction Index showed significant negative correlation between cophenetic distance and proportional expansion and distance expansion, indicating higher transgression between more closely related species, and a marginally significant positive correlation (p = 0.053) with range expansion ( Table 2 ).

For the Control condition, laterality effect was marginally significant, F(2,38) = 3.2, p = 0.053.

Pairwise comparisons revealed the largest significant differences between AF—AL and AF—AP ( p = 0.009 for both), followed by AA—AF ( p = 0.019) and AA—AP ( p = 0.040); a marginally significant difference between AA—AL ( p = 0.053); and a close association between AL and AP ( p = 0.068); however, after correction for multiple sampling, differences were significant only for the AF—AL and AF—AP comparisons.

Finally, a MANOVA showed a marginally significant effect of the social information condition on the participants' affect, Wilks' Λ = .95, F (2, 132) = 2.991, p = .053, η p 2 = 0.04.

A marginally significant difference was observed between ANXA10 expression and Lauren classification ( p = 0.053, Fisher’s exact test).

Conversely, in the control group, a marginally significant variance was noted in the DMFT score between males and females ( p = 0.053), alongside a statistically significant difference in the amount of teeth with fillings ( p = 0.02), as detailed in Table 2 .

A strong association between intracranial bleeding (comprising the diagnosis of spontaneous hemorrhage and vascular pathology) and the risk of obstruction was evidenced in the multivariable analysis, with an OR of 9.14, even though differences were marginally significant ( p =0.053).

For the MBSR group, Δlow-beta power in resting 1 for the Pz site was found to have a negative correlation with ΔDERS ( b =−0.50, p =0.040), Δtheta in breathing for the Pz site had a marginally significant negative correlation with ΔFFMQ ( b =−0.48, p =0.053), Δlow-beta in body-scan for the Fz site had a marginally significant negative correlation with ΔFFMQ ( b =−0.48, p =0.054), Δalpha in resting 2 for both Fz ( b =−0.64, p =0.006) and Pz sites ( b =−0.51, p =0.036) showed a negative correlation with ΔFFMQ, and Δtheta in resting 2 for the Pz site had a marginally significant negative correlation with ΔFFMQ ( b =−0.47, p =0.058).

After controlling for age, the results reported significant group differences in FBI levels ( F (2,68) = 6.252, p = 0.003, partial η 2 = 0.157); FGW ( F (2,67) = 16,670, p < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.332) and marginally significant differences in body anxiety ( F (2,67) = 3.077, p = 0.053, partial η 2 = 0.084).