“marginally significant”

Differences in peak selectivity time were marginally significant between the 2 categories of cells (D = 0.38, p = 0.053; Kolmogorov–Smirnov test).

Interestingly, a marginally significant Condition × Trial number interaction ( F 6,162 = 2.12, p = .053, η p 2 = 0.073) suggested that conditioned freezing responses to CSs of the different conditions changed over the course of generalization.

Post-hoc tests revealed significant decreases from Pre-ECT ( M Pre-ECT =30.71, SD Pre-ECT =7.45) to T0, T1, and T2 ( M T0 =18.07, SD T0 =10.22, M T1 =13.43, SD T1 =9.91, M T2 =12.86 SD T2 =13.03), p <0.001, as well as T0 to T2 ( p =0.044) and a marginally significant decrease from T0 to T1 ( p =0.053) in clinician-rated depression severity.

GG genotype female subjects demonstrated more pronounced decreases in weight and BMI changes post-training ( p < 0.05), with body fat showing a marginally significant trend ( p = 0.053).

There was only a marginally significant association between the rate of recovery for numbness after surgery and patient age (p=0.053).

A marginally significant inverse association between CBF i and Hb was also observed ( p = 0.053).

However, when the two species were compared using a linear model, species had the greatest effect on FECs (plains zebras had higher FECs than Grevy's zebras; slope = 1244.5, p < .05) and the species x centroid distance interaction was also significant (plains zebras had a steeper response than Grevy's zebras; slope = −1.53, p < .01), while the centroid distance effect on FECs became marginally significant (slope = −0.49, p = .053; model adj.

The Line × Density interaction had a marginally significant effect on offspring length ( figure 2 c ; table 2 ), which seemed to be longer in LB than in SB populations, but only under high medaka density (adj p = 0.053; electronic supplementary material, table S3.A).

For ‘target absent’ displays, a marginally significant interaction between set size and group was found ( F (4.67,179.68) = 2.82, p = 0.053, η p 2 = 0.056).

Of these, lag5 was the most significant ( p = 0.003); lag3 and lag4 were marginally significant ( p = 0.053; p = 0.081).

The main effect of salience was marginally significant, Estimates = −0.131, β = −0.150, t = −1.94, p = 0.053, Cohen’s d = −1.942.

In terms of an interaction effect, one combination of educational and income levels was marginally significant relative to the reference combination (P=0.053).

For the 1-week delay there was a marginally significant difference between the conditions ( F [1, 39] = 3.99, P = 0.053) but again no significant group difference emerged ( F [1, 39] = 2.74, P = 0.11) nor an interaction effect ( F [1, 39] = 1.6, P = 0.21) (with percentages of 0.17 and 0.30 in the Include and 0.32 and 0.33 in the Exclude condition for the patients and controls, respectively).

9.2% respectively). Oncological outcomes (OS, CSS) In stage II prostate cancer, significantly better OS is observed in the HIFU group compared with the RT group before IPTW adjustment ( p = 0.001), but the significance is marginally significant after IPTW adjustment ( p = 0.053).

The association between the ISI 0,120 level and WMH burden was marginally significant after additionally adjusted by model 2 (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.89, p=0.053).

A marginally significant increase in risk was observed in female patients ( P = 0.053) and IDH-wildtype patients ( P = 0.060).

There was a marginally significant difference in the adequate protection rates for the fold type before and during intubation using a direct laryngoscope ( P = 0.053) ( Figure 3 ). 3.4.

Age-related differences in the hygiene score were marginally significant ( p = 0.053).

By regressing out the effects of age, sex, education, and TIV, we found that for the N-to-M progression, sNC from BABRI presented a marginally significant positive correlation between the GM density of the superior temporal gyrus and that of the hippocampus ( r = 0.400, p = 0.053), while this correlation disappeared in pNC ( r = 0.218, p = 0.455) in the BABRI sample.

We found a marginally significant difference in the mean infrastructure costs (p = 0.053) and mean pharmaceutical costs (p = 0.067), between the two groups.

Wind speed had no significant effect in the plant cuttings ( p = 0.94), and a marginally significant, negative linear effect in the reference individuals ( p = 0.053; Fig. 4 d; Table 3 ).

lindemuthianum -inoculation on the levels of herbivory ( p < 0.01, see Table S3 ) but not for Trichoderma strain or bean cultivar ( p > 0.05, Kruskal Wallis tests), although the exact p -values indicate ‘marginally significant’ effects ( p = 0.053 for ‘cultivar’ and p = 0.057 for ‘ Trichoderma ’).

STAT3 levels (marginally significant) were higher in AD relative to CN ( P = 0.053) ( Fig. 5B ).

Co-variation of group-differences in the two measurements was also significant for the sibling-patient comparison ( r = −0.54, p < .001), and marginally significant for the control-sibling comparison ( r = −0.26, p = .053).

A marginally significant association was further observed in the validation stage with 47 cases and 48 controls using pre-diagnostic samples (OR = 1.28; 95%CI: 0.98, 2.97; p = 0.053).