“marginally significant”

This model revealed a marginally significant three-way interaction (LRT, χ 2 1 = 3.69, p = 0.055, β = 0.75, CI = 0.75–0.75; Fig. 7a ; Table S17 ).

Notably, the left parietal inferior region showed a significant correlation during action observation ( r = 0.48, p = 0.041), and a marginally significant correlation during action execution ( r = 0.39, p = 0.055).

The bandwidth difference between the AE and NDE was marginally significant ( z = 1.602, P = 0.055).

Anemia was more common in AIDS patients (41/52 (78.8%)) than others, this difference was marginally significant ( P -value=0.055).

The likelihood ratio was marginally significant ( p = 0.055), which is evidence that the main effects model fit the data relatively poorly.

The differences in hazard perception test for pedestrians scores after 12 weeks of intervention between the groups were marginally significant (F (2, 39)=3.13, p = 0.055).

The association between LMR and PFS in patients with IPI score ≥2 was marginally significant in overall patients ( P = 0.055, Fig. 3H ), but not in the testing set ( P = 0.137, Fig. 3D ).

The Seagrass and Mangrove sites showed fewer Cyanobacteria than the Phytoplankton site (ANOVA, marginally significant differences p = 0.055, n = 12) and different Proteobacterial groups, mainly in the Alphaproteobacteria class.

In terms of infant birth weight, higher prenatal maternal anxiety was significantly associated with lower infant birth weight for male infants (β = −0.230, SE = 0.101, p = .022) and marginally significant for female infants (β = −0.223, SE = 0.117, p = .055).

In the model which accounted for the time-to-first event, single use of expedited programmes correlated inversely to the chance of safety events (adjusted HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.89; p=0.009), while triple or more use had marginally significant higher risk (adjusted HR 1.58, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.53; p=0.055).

There was evidence of marginally significant between-study heterogeneity ( I 2 =33.9% P =0.055), but when repeating the meta-analysis under the random-effects model, we found that evidence for association remained significant (pooled OR 1.13; 95% CI 1.00–1.27; P =0.04).

In Nova Scotia, the effect of training system was marginally significant for P. penetrans per g root ( p = 0.055) but with the Tall Spindle Axe training system supporting greater P. penetrans per g root than Upright Fruiting Offshoots or Kym Greene Bush training systems.

Relationship among glymphatic functioning, rumination, and depression We found a marginally significant difference in glymphatic functioning, as indicated by the DTI-ALPS, between MDD patients and HC ( t = −1.95, p = 0.055) ( Figure 1B ).

Savings and insurance also have some substitutional relationship, with the protective effect of savings in households without commercial insurance being 1.7 times that in households with commercial insurance, with marginally significant between-group differences ( p = 0.055).

For the neutral group, there was a marginally significant interaction between location and training, F (1,15) = 4.339, P = 0.055, and η p 2 = 0.224, due to greater learning at the trained than at the untrained location.

In the inclusive analysis, the three-way interaction was marginally significant ( F (1,33) = 3.95, p = 0.055, η p 2 = 0.107).

This association persisted as a marginally significant trend for long-term effects ( r s = 0.745, p = 0.055, q = 0.059).

Data of two participants (one LL- and one UL-CRPS) were identified as influential (Cook’s distance > 0.15) 43 and had been removed from this analysis, however, retaining them in the data resulted in a consistent but marginally significant correlation ( p = 0.055; Supplementary Figure S6 ).

The correlations between CV in tree intervals and Sp were significant in nuclear genotypes (Kendall τ = .397, p = .027) and marginally significant in chloroplast haplotypes (Pearson r = .472, p = .055), indicating more intensive SGS as trees became more aggregated (Figure 3 g,h).

The tACS 3 effect was marginally significant (t 38 = 1.98, p = 0.055, Cohen’s d = 0.63).

5/18 versus 1/20 were remitters; this is only a marginally significant difference (Chi‐square test, p = .055; Fishers Exact test, p = .083).

A 2 (group) by 2 (task) repeated measures ANOVA for the slope values showed a marginally significant interaction between task and musical training [ F (1, 37) = 3.940, p = 0.055, partial η 2 = 0.096].

ving flags [χ 2 (1, N = 66) = 16.269, p < 0.001], using personification and choosing among different text-image relations [ χ 2 (2, N = 66) = 13.141, p = 0.001], using personification and using iconography in general [ χ 2 (2, N = 66) = 6.180, p = 0.046], with those instances involving people being marginally significant [ χ 2 (1, N = 66) = 3.681, p = 0.055], but still more significant than the remaining subtypes.

On the other hand, the percentage of CD16+/CD56 T cells showed a significant decrease in all groups except group 5 ( p = 0.136), while group 3 was marginally significant ( p = 0.055).

The BCVA after surgery was marginally significant different ( p = 0.055), which was 0.17 ± 0.20 in pediatric and 0.39 ± 0.59 in adult.