“marginally significant”

The main effect of morphology was significant in the FG ( F (2, 42) = 10.74, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.09) and MOG ( F (2, 42) = 14.85, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.09) and marginally significant in the LG ( F (2, 42) = 3.11, p = 0.055, η2 = 0.03).

Upon adjustment, individuals born in countries other than Greece were less likely to experience an MO of testing, although this association was marginally significant (aOR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.22–1.02; p = 0.055).

When evaluated in a Cox model with backward selection, only vimentin.N emerged as a marginally significant parameter using 0.05 as the traditional threshold for inclusion in a final model ( P =0.055, hazard ratio=4.10).

Results Offspring performance Source population ( F 1,193 = 10.450, P = 0.0014) and maternal diet ( F 1,193 = 33.577, P < 0.0001) had a significant effect on egg mass, with a marginally significant interaction between source population and maternal diet ( F 1,193 = 3.727, P = 0.055).

Data of two participants (one LL- and one UL-CRPS) were identified as influential (Cook’s distance > 0.15) 43 and had been removed from this analysis, however, retaining them in the data resulted in a consistent but marginally significant correlation ( p = 0.055; Supplementary Figure S6 ).

This advantage persisted at 2 months ( P = 0.002) and remained marginally significant at 3 months ( P = 0.055), with continued superiority in pain control at 6 months ( P = 0.040).

Visual Prime) was marginally significant, β = 0.01, SE = 0.01, t (61.97) = 1.96, p = .055.

In the final model (model 3), the association with sedentary screen-based behavior was marginally significant ( p = 0.055).

However, we found marginally significant differences concerning the perceived COVID-19 threat, F (3,404) = 2.55, p = 0.055.

Repeated measures ANOVA found a marginally significant group × frame × stage interaction (F(1,78) = 3.788, p = .055).

A marginally significant association was found for SARS-CoV-2 positivity within the age group ( p = 0.055), and no statistically significant association was found for SARS-CoV-2 positivity within gender ( p = 0.44) (Table 2 ).

The BCVA after surgery was marginally significant different ( p = 0.055), which was 0.17 ± 0.20 in pediatric and 0.39 ± 0.59 in adult.

Subsequently, ground composition (PC1 ground) showed a positive relationship to overall prey biomass (P = 0.027, R 2 = 0.54) and a positive relationship with Hymenoptera biomass on the ground (P = 0.007, R 2 = 0.72), underlain by a marginally significant, positive, association between Hymenoptera and prey biomass from ground sampling (P = 0.055, R 2 = 0.48) ( Fig 5F ).

For the preschool group, there was a marginally significant task × group interaction effect for mean BPM, F (1,38) = 3.92, p = 0.055, η 2 = 0.10.

Within-subjects simple contrasts (alcohol exposure was used as reference) indicated that the interaction was marginally significant for alcohol exposure vs. baseline alcohol ( F [1, 38] = 3.91, p = 0.055) and significant for alcohol exposure vs. baseline water ( F [1, 38] = 5.75, p < 0.05).

Mediation analysis showed that the total effect of insomnia on favorable attitudes toward hypnotics was marginally significant (β = 0.08, p = 0.055), while the direct effect was not significant (β = 0.04, p = 0.32).

This model revealed a marginally significant three-way interaction (LRT, χ 2 1 = 3.69, p = 0.055, β = 0.75, CI = 0.75–0.75; Fig. 7a ; Table S17 ).

The difference in residual corneal thickness between the two groups was not statistically significant, but was marginally significant ( p = 0.055).

The tACS 3 effect was marginally significant (t 38 = 1.98, p = 0.055, Cohen’s d = 0.63).

NSC concentrations and pools The NSC, starch and SS concentrations in the different organs were, in general, similar between dry- and moist-climate seedlings, except for marginally significant trends for higher root NSC and starch concentrations in moist-climate seedlings (climate effect: P = 0.055 [NSC], P = 0.051 [starch], respectively) ( Table 1 and Figure 3 ).

The between-group comparison showed that the locomotor activity count was the highest in stress-exposed rats, i.e., it was significantly higher in this group compared to the control (* p < 0.05) and the stress-exposed fructose-fed group ( # p < 0.05), while the comparison with the fructose-fed group showed a marginally significant p -value ( p = 0.055).

Northern Ireland showed a marginally significant interaction term (−4.4, 95% CI: −8.899 to 0.098, p = 0.055), suggesting slight differences compared to England.

However, we observed a marginally significant interaction between origin and exclusion treatment (χ 2 2 = 5.81, p = .055; Table 6 ; Figure 5 ).

Uncontrolled extracranial disease and receipt of repeat brain irradiation (with WBI or Gamma-knife) for brain recurrence were marginally significant in multivariate analysis of BCrec ( P = 0.055 and P = 0.050).

Within the 800m buffer, greater park proximity was also found to be associated with more step counts (B = 0.02; 95% CI 0.01, 0.04), higher minutes in LPA (B = 0.01; 95% CI 0.00, 0.01), and less sedentary time (B=-2.00; 95% CI -3.77, -0.24) in a day, contributed by changes in the afternoon and evening, although the increase in LPA in the afternoon was marginally significant ( p = 0.055).