“marginally significant”

The difference in OS by rLN was marginally significant in the entire model (P=0.055).

BMI demonstrated a small-to-moderate negative association with overall QoL (β = −0.205, p = 0.005), while the negative association with age was small and marginally significant (β = −0.134, p = 0.055).

Data of two participants (one LL- and one UL-CRPS) were identified as influential (Cook’s distance > 0.15) 43 and had been removed from this analysis, however, retaining them in the data resulted in a consistent but marginally significant correlation ( p = 0.055; Supplementary Figure S6 ).

When we repeated the analysis using the negative value of FIB-4 < 1.45 (rule out criterion for the presence of LF), we found an inverse association between low FIB-4 score and AEs at univariable OR: 0.45, 95%CI 0.24–0.86, p = 0.015, a marginally significant value at multivariable analysis (using Model A variables) with OR 0.55, 95%CI 0.30–1.01, p = 0.055).

There was, however, a marginally significant memory type main effect in the hippocampal ROI [ F (1, 38) = 3.93, p = 0.055], reflecting higher activation for explicit- compared to implicit-repeated displays 4 .

0.01, respectively); marginally significant in the near-ceiling learner (S4: F (5, 15) = 2.80, p ≈ 0.055); and not significant in the other three (S5: F (5, 15) = 1.11 p ≈ 0.396; S6: F (1, 15) = 0.73, p ≈ 0.6137; S7: F (1, 15) = 2.21, p ≈ 0.108; respectively).

The difference between the 2 groups in incidence of highest HR ≥ 110 bpm was marginally significant (34.52% vs. 19.23%, p = 0.055).

In non-irrigated clusters, marginally significant difference in malaria prevalence was observed between the wet season [4.9% (25/511)] and dry season [2.9% (25/865), p = 0.055] (Table 2 ).

Total annual precipitation was a marginally significant predictor ( β = 2590.7661, t = 2.490, p = 0.055), while average annual temperature showed a significant relationship ( β = 814,100, t = 3.522, p < 0.05).

Additionally, Surgeon 4 demonstrated a marginally significant association with glaucoma risk (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.20 to 1.02, p = 0.055).

The marginally significant correlation (r = .24, p = .055) indicates that the agency attributed to Pinocchio plays a role in inducing the effect.

russatus females exposed to blue ALAN were significantly higher ( P < 0.05) and marginally significant in females exposed to white light ( P = 0.055) compared to controls (Fig. 3 C).

Simple slope analyses revealed that in the control condition, there was a marginally significant negative relationship between increased conservatism and white noise P3 mean amplitudes, t (96) = − 1.946, p = 0.055.

LND) and canopy cover (tree or no tree) was marginally significant ( p = 0.055, R 2 m = 0.7).

NSC concentrations and pools The NSC, starch and SS concentrations in the different organs were, in general, similar between dry- and moist-climate seedlings, except for marginally significant trends for higher root NSC and starch concentrations in moist-climate seedlings (climate effect: P = 0.055 [NSC], P = 0.051 [starch], respectively) ( Table 1 and Figure 3 ).

However, post hoc analysis revealed that this practice effect was statistically significant only in the younger group ( Figure 1B ), while in the older group the test-retest difference between visits 1 and 2 revealed a marginally significant trend (trial factor p = .055).

melanogaster (see Discussion), showed a significant down-regulation in diapausing and reproducing females compared to young females and a marginally significant (FC = 1.8 and p = 0.055) up-regulation in diapausing females compared to reproducing females.

After accounting for sex and years since training, a statistically significant association was not found between specialty (general internist vs subspecialist) and self-rated competence in medical interviewing ( P = .162), and a marginally significant association was found between years since training (ie, more than one year) and self-rated competence ( P = .055).

Northern Ireland showed a marginally significant interaction term (−4.4, 95% CI: −8.899 to 0.098, p = 0.055), suggesting slight differences compared to England.

Correlation Analysis of Choice Oviposition, Developmental Parameters, and Fruit Physiological Parameters The choice oviposition showed a significant negative correlation with the color parameters L * (r = −0.85, p = 0.030) and b * (r = −0.89, p = 0.019), and a marginally significant positive correlation with the CIRG (r = 0.80, p = 0.055) (see Table 2 , Figure 4 ).

There was a marginally significant interaction between Trial type and Simon score ( t = 1.92, p = 0.055), suggesting a trend that the higher Simon scores showed the greater mixing costs.

We also found a marginally significant effect of time on estimated weight in kilograms for Roemer: (1) t (54.389) = -1.960, p = .055, 95% CI [-3.99, .04].

Additionally, even after controlling for the interactions with wealth, the main effect of hedonic variety remained significant or marginally significant (controlling for interaction with investments; p = .055).

The total effect of perceived stress on BMI was marginally significant (B = 0.091, SE = 0.047, p = 0.055).

The results showed that the effect of emotion group was marginally significant, F (1, 53) = 3.86, p = .055, η p 2 = .07, with worse delayed memory in the positive condition ( M = .26, SE = .02) than in the control condition ( M = .31, SE = .02).