Uncontrolled extracranial disease and receipt of repeat brain irradiation (with WBI or Gamma-knife) for brain recurrence were marginally significant in multivariate analysis of BCrec ( P = 0.055 and P = 0.050).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
Results: Significant differences were found in the raw cognitive scores between patients and HC [semantic fluency ( t = 6.07; p < 0.001), verbal memory ( t = 6.63; p < 0.001), and executive functions ( t = 2.57; p = 0.013), and in visual memory ( t = 1.97; p = 0.055 marginally significant)].
Moreover, the ANOVA test revealed a marginally significant interaction between the reflexive and antecedent factors ( F (2, 68) = 3.022, p = 0.055, η 2 = 0.011).
Furthermore, the MANCOVA on the same aPET ROI and the bilateral OFC fNIRS revealed a significant group effect [ F (6, 174) = 6.64, p < .001], leading to a significant effect on amyloid PET [ F (3, 88) = 11.46, p < .001] and a marginally significant effect on fNIRS [ F (3, 88) = 2.63, p = .055], Overall, Fig 6 shows that the amyloid PET signal tends to better differentiate the AD group from others, and the fNIRS signal tends to differentiate the SMI group from the other groups. fNIRS and anatomical measures When the LME model was fitted to the anatomical measures, no significant correlation between the fNIRS ROIs and gray volume or cortical thickness was found above and beyond what the group difference could explain.
At the T3 follow-up assessment (12 weeks after baseline), only HOP effects on stigma stress, on disclosure attitudes at work and on secrecy remained significant, with effects on overall quality of life remaining marginally significant ( p = 0.055, Table 4 ).
A moderation analysis showed a marginally significant interaction between preoperative anxiety and sex on chronic postsurgical pain (b = 0.15, 95% CI [−0.003, 0.30], p = 0.055).
Model results showed no significant total and direct effects (β = 0.08, p > 0.10; β = 0.08, p > 0.10, respectively), however, the indirect effect from intervention to ESI kindergarten via spring EF and spring task behavior in preschool was marginally significant (β = 0.004, p = 0.055) (see Figure 4 ).
MXR and heme oxygenase showed a marginally significant relationship (heme oxygenase: Pearson test, p -value = 0.055, MXR: Spearman test, p -value = 0.08).
Although marginally significant ( P = .055), our study suggests that mothers of female infants may shed more breast milk CFV compared to those of male infants.
BMI demonstrated a small-to-moderate negative association with overall QoL (β = −0.205, p = 0.005), while the negative association with age was small and marginally significant (β = −0.134, p = 0.055).
We found a marginally significant main effect of crossing the mission boundary ( p = 0.055) on confidence, indicating higher confidence in correct responses when participants were within the mission boundary compared to when they crossed the mission boundary (Table 2 ).
dolichurus ), the result was marginally significant ( rho = 0.447, P = 0.055).
Positive Autobiographical Memory, the aggregate classification accuracy was 68.9% (marginally significant at p = .055, balanced-block permutation test), and for the Negative vs.
3 C ), whereas it decreased slightly in the slow group, resulting in a significant TIME × GROUP interaction [ F (1,16) = 5.762, P = 0.029] and a marginally significant effect of TIME [ F (1,8) = 5.021, P = 0.055].
In addition, we found faster saccadic RTs in trials with a relevant than an irrelevant cue in the first display (241 ms versus 273 ms), resulting in a marginally significant main effect for cue type, (1,10) = 4.72, p = .055.
In Step 4, the main effect of Indian status was significant (β = 1.93, SE = 0.19, p < 0.001), the main effect of the defendant’s racial categorization was marginally significant (β = 0.33, SE = 0.17, p = 0.055), and the conditional effect of defendant photo stereotypicality was significant (β = 0.70, SE = 0.33, p = 0.03).
In the inclusive analysis, the three-way interaction was marginally significant ( F (1,33) = 3.95, p = 0.055, η p 2 = 0.107).
A computation of Tukey HSD (Tukey Honest Significant Differences, R function: TukeyHSD()) for performing multiple pairwise-comparison between the means of developmental groups found a significant difference in tokens ( p < 0.001) and types ( p < 0.001) between the Prelexical and the Advanced-Lexical group, a marginally significant difference in tokens ( p = 0.055) but not in types ( p = 0.48) between the Prelexical and the Early-Lexical group, and no significant difference in tokens ( p = 0.13) but in types ( p < 0.05) between Early-Lexical and Advanced-Lexical group.
Results Including both placebo and treatment groups in the analysis, there was a marginally significant positive correlation between the post-period 1 PK values and the N1 amplitude to the first stimulus (rho = 0.396, p = .055; N = 24 valid).
In Nova Scotia, the effect of training system was marginally significant for P. penetrans per g root ( p = 0.055) but with the Tall Spindle Axe training system supporting greater P. penetrans per g root than Upright Fruiting Offshoots or Kym Greene Bush training systems.
Age was marginally significant in model 2 (P=0.055).
Post-hoc tests indicated that there were significant increases in ARAT scores between Pre and Post ( p = 0.015, Bonferroni corrected), marginally significant between Pre and Post6month ( p = 0.055, Bonferroni corrected).
A marginally significant correlation was observed, with a similar effect size and direction to those yielded by our initial analysis, r (96) = −0.19, p = 0.055.
It is worth mentioning that the association between the left anterior cerebellum and total aggression showed a marginally significant FDR-corrected effect ( p = 0.055).
Task Density only had a marginally significant interaction effect with cognitive style ( F 1,39 = 1.85, p < 0.055), with FD participants having a slightly more elevated use of aids during high density tasks.