Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = .0551.1× alphagold
Furthermore, the MANCOVA on the same aPET ROI and the bilateral OFC fNIRS revealed a significant group effect [ F (6, 174) = 6.64, p < .001], leading to a significant effect on amyloid PET [ F (3, 88) = 11.46, p < .001] and a marginally significant effect on fNIRS [ F (3, 88) = 2.63, p = .055], Overall, Fig 6 shows that the amyloid PET signal tends to better differentiate the AD group from others, and the fNIRS signal tends to differentiate the SMI group from the other groups. fNIRS and anatomical measures When the LME model was fitted to the anatomical measures, no significant correlation between the fNIRS ROIs and gray volume or cortical thickness was found above and beyond what the group difference could explain.
marginally significantp = 0.0551.1× alphagold
At the T3 follow-up assessment (12 weeks after baseline), only HOP effects on stigma stress, on disclosure attitudes at work and on secrecy remained significant, with effects on overall quality of life remaining marginally significant ( p = 0.055, Table 4 ).
marginally significantp = 0.0551.1× alphagold
Model results showed no significant total and direct effects (β = 0.08, p > 0.10; β = 0.08, p > 0.10, respectively), however, the indirect effect from intervention to ESI kindergarten via spring EF and spring task behavior in preschool was marginally significant (β = 0.004, p = 0.055) (see Figure 4 ).
marginally significantP = 0.0551.1× alphagold
3 C ), whereas it decreased slightly in the slow group, resulting in a significant TIME × GROUP interaction [ F (1,16) = 5.762, P = 0.029] and a marginally significant effect of TIME [ F (1,8) = 5.021, P = 0.055].
Movement speed is biased by prior experience.
J Neurophysiol · 2014 · PMC4527989
marginally significantp = 0.0551.1× alphagold
A computation of Tukey HSD (Tukey Honest Significant Differences, R function: TukeyHSD()) for performing multiple pairwise-comparison between the means of developmental groups found a significant difference in tokens ( p < 0.001) and types ( p < 0.001) between the Prelexical and the Advanced-Lexical group, a marginally significant difference in tokens ( p = 0.055) but not in types ( p = 0.48) between the Prelexical and the Early-Lexical group, and no significant difference in tokens ( p = 0.13) but in types ( p < 0.05) between Early-Lexical and Advanced-Lexical group.