Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = .0561.1× alphagold
Moreover, parental psychological control showed a marginally significant effect on the intercept of anxiety symptoms (β intercept = .21, p = .056), with an effect size comparable to depression, suggesting that adolescents that experience higher levels of parental psychological control also reported higher levels of anxiety.
marginally significantp = .0561.1× alphagold
Specifically, the main effect of the PIS significantly improved trust in COVID‐19 vaccine‐related information ( F (1, 323) = 4.39, p = .037), and the reduction in COVID‐19 vaccine safety‐related worry was marginally significant ( F (1, 323) = 3.68, p = .056).
marginally significantp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
vaginalis at month 1 (rho = 0.40, p = 0.03) ( Figure 1A ), a marginally significant correlation between the relative abundance of G. vaginalis and TFV VF concentrations at month 2 (rho = 0.38, p = 0.056) ( Figure 1B ), and no significant correlation by month 3 (rho = 0.1, p = 0.96) ( Figure 1C ).
marginally significantp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
We found a marginally significant interaction between year and genetic cluster for condition index (year × genetic cluster: F df=3 = 2.5351, p = 0.056; Table S10 ), likely representing differences in the condition of oysters among genetic clusters in fall 2018 (with gME lower than gVA) that were no longer present in 2020 (Figure 5a ).
marginally significantp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
The result of ANOVA indicated that flight duration was significantly different between female and male individuals (F: 4.84 ± 0.43 h ( n = 72); M: 3.31 ± 0.33 h ( n = 88); F 1,156 = 9.71, p = 0.002), but just a marginally significant difference between individuals at different ages ( F 2,156 = 2.94, p = 0.056) ( Figure 2 c,d).
marginally significantP = 0.0561.1× alphagold
Notably, non-responders exhibited significantly higher LRPS expression compared with responders ( Supplementary Figure S5A ; Wilcoxon test, P = 0.015), while CCL20 showed a marginally significant upregulation trend in non-responders ( Supplementary Figure S5B ; Wilcoxon test, P = 0.056). 3.8 CCL20 promotes HCC cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and lactate production in vitro To elucidate the biological functions of CCL20 in HCC, we conducted a series of in vitro experiments using Hep3B and MHCC97H cell lines.
marginally significantP =.0561.1× alphagold
A repeated measures analysis of variance showed a marginally significant main effect of time for the health distress items ( F 1,22 =4.080; P =.056; η 2 =0.156; power=0.489), indicating that overall, participants’ scores showed less health distress (ie, discouragement, fear, worry, and frustration) in their last assessment (mean 2.01, SD 0.81) than in their first assessment (mean 2.36, SD 1.24).
marginally significantp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
In follow-up analyses, separate rANOVAs for each of the rhythmic and arrhythmic conditions with factors ROI and hemisphere revealed a significant effect of ROI (F(2, 20) = 8.662, p = 0.006, η p 2 = 0.490) in the arrhythmic condition, with larger cortical activity over the auditory cortex compared to the sensorimotor ( p = 0.056; marginally significant) and premotor ( p = 0.014; significant) regions but no significant effect of ROI in the rhythmic condition ( Figure 2 I).
marginally significantp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
We found a marginally significant genotype x day interaction [F(7,238) = 2.00, p = 0.056], a treatment x day interaction [F(7,238) = 2.23, p = 0.032], no genotype x treatment interaction, a main effect of genotype [F(1,34) = 20.63, p < 0.001], no main effect of treatment, and a main effect of day [F(7,238) = 24.66, p < 0.001].
marginally significantp=0.0561.1× alphagold
In the external validation set, among patients with ccRCC, a significant association was observed between the positive presence of SFL-TLS and longer PFS (p=0.028, HR=0.320), while its relationship with OS was marginally significant (p=0.056, HR=0.181).
marginally significantp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
Relationship between Facial Color Type and Hunting Behavior The proportion of facial color types differed marginally significant between the two types of hunting behaviors (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.056; Figure 5b ); the proportion of group-hunting species with A-type faces was higher than for species with other face types.