“marginally significant”

However, after applying the Bonferroni correction, only maternal sensitivity, maternal controlling behavior, and infant cooperative behavior remained significantly associated with types of maternal violation in the FSFF, while maternal unresponsivity was marginally significant ( p =.056).

For all first teacher–child dyads together the analysis revealed a small, marginally significant increase in Closeness (TAU = 0.23, p = .056).

Between pre-ictal and mid-seizure, EZ-nR connectivity declined considerably ( p ≈0.002), followed by a marginally significant fall for RnEZ-nR (p=0.056).

Types of narcissism had marginally significant main effect on other-rated creativity performance, F (2, 107) = 2.95, p = 0.056, η 2 = 0.05.

The interaction was marginally significant for utilitarian motives, F 1,112 = 3.74, p = .056, η 2 = .03, showing that participants opted for more utilitarian punishment towards a typical versus atypical ingroup offender.

alien species was not significantly different (t ≤ 1.2, p > 0.05, in 8 sites), and only in one site (Playa Maya), alien species showed a marginally significant higher normalized degree (t 270 = 1.95, p = 0.056).

However, there was a marginally significant three-way interaction on independent assessor negative ratings ( b = -5.50, SE = 2.84, p = .056), which mirrored the three-way interaction for positive ratings.

A repeated measures analysis of variance showed a marginally significant main effect of time for the health distress items ( F 1,22 =4.080; P =.056; η 2 =0.156; power=0.489), indicating that overall, participants’ scores showed less health distress (ie, discouragement, fear, worry, and frustration) in their last assessment (mean 2.01, SD 0.81) than in their first assessment (mean 2.36, SD 1.24).

When data from MMSE was used, the pooled effect size was marginally significant (SMD, 0.65; 95% CI, −0.02 to 1.32; p = 0.056; I 2 = 89.9%).

Flax-seeds were more frequently consumed in the n -6/ n -3 < 10 group but the differences were marginally significant ( p = 0.056) and no other differences were observed.

The repeated measures ANOVA on distance (dist-0 through dist-5) showed a marginally significant main effect, F (4,92)=2.39, p =.056, ηp 2 =.09, which plateaued at the dist-2 location (Fig. 4 B).

Additionally, the decrease of SWAY(z) from Set 1 to Set 2 was marginally significant [ 52 ] ( p =.056), as well as the decrease of RANGE(y) ( p =.07).

The results confirmed that social anxiety exerted a marginally significant main effect on the women’s willingness to embrace attractiveness-enhancement risks ( F (1, 136) = 3.72, p = 0.056, η 2 p = 0.027).

The ADE and total effect were found to be marginally significant ( P = 0.056 and P = 0.064, respectively).

There was a marginally significant interaction between the prognostic impact of a decrease in eGFR and the choice of diagnostic imaging modality (interaction-p = 0.056).

Marginally significant difference was also observed between L. lactis and Lactobacillus high-G + C species ( p = 0.056).

Specifically, the main effect of the PIS significantly improved trust in COVID‐19 vaccine‐related information ( F (1, 323) = 4.39, p = .037), and the reduction in COVID‐19 vaccine safety‐related worry was marginally significant ( F (1, 323) = 3.68, p = .056).

Only VHI-total presented a marginally significant difference (p = 0.056), with the highest VHI-total median observed for the category G = 1.

The previously significant indirect effect of new group memberships on resilience became marginally significant ( β = 0.14, P = 0.056, 95% CI = −0, 0.28).

This trend remained marginally significant when exercise posts were excluded (N = 24; W = 83.0, p = 0.056), suggesting that increased PD engagement was not solely attributable to fitness discussions.

The main effect of condition was marginally significant ( F (2, 72) = 3.01, p = .056, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ {\eta}_p^2 $$\end{document} η p 2 = .08, 1 – β = .57).

This was paralleled by the greater frequency of small tumors sized 10 mm or less in the later‐onset PTCs (24.1% vs 60.0%, P = .026 on univariate and P = .059 on multivariate analysis, Table S2 ), which remained marginally significant in the combined pediatric subgroup on multivariate analysis ( P = .056, Table S3 ).

Marginally significant difference was found in scores of MCI group at NPI task ( z = -1.912, p = 0.056) whereas a statistically significant decrease was reported in their functionality based on FUCAS test [Before training: 42.00 (42.00, 46.00); After training: 44.50 (42.00, 46.00); z = -2.168, p = 0.030] (Figure 2 ).

The β LDL/HDL had the biggest values in the non-traditional lipid variables and there was a marginally significant difference between β LDL/HDL and β LDL ( P = 0.056).

Notably, non-responders exhibited significantly higher LRPS expression compared with responders ( Supplementary Figure S5A ; Wilcoxon test, P = 0.015), while CCL20 showed a marginally significant upregulation trend in non-responders ( Supplementary Figure S5B ; Wilcoxon test, P = 0.056). 3.8 CCL20 promotes HCC cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and lactate production in vitro To elucidate the biological functions of CCL20 in HCC, we conducted a series of in vitro experiments using Hep3B and MHCC97H cell lines.