Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp < 0.0571.1× alphagold
For the outcome binge drinking four or more times we found marginally significant interaction between intervention x baseline lifetime binge drinking (OR: 0.36, 95%CI: 0.12–1.03, p < 0.057) and with stating it would be ok if I drank more (OR: 0.43, 95%CI: 0.16–1.12, p < 0.084,).
marginally significantP = 0.0571.1× alphagold
There was a significant reduction in total cancer incidence (105 vs 137 cases, P = 0.03), prostate cancer (22 vs 42 cases, P = 0.005), a marginally significant reduction in colorectal cancer incidence (9 vs 19 cases, P = 0.057), and a reduction in cancer mortality, all cancer sites (40 vs 66 deaths, P = 0.008) (selenium versus control group cases reported, respectively) [ 98 ].
marginally significantP = 0.0571.1× alphagold
Thirteen trials, with interventions ranging from 4 to 12 weeks and involving 521 participants, demonstrated significant reductions in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (Standardized Mean Difference [SMD] = − 0.67; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] − 1.01, − 0.32; P < 0.001), C-reactive protein (CRP) (SMD = − 0.51; 95% CI − 0.96, − 0.05; P = 0.028), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) (SMD = − 0.74; 95% CI − 1.16, − 0.32; P < 0.001), and a marginally significant effect on fasting blood sugar (FBS) (SMD = − 0.57; 95% CI − 1.16, 0.02; P = 0.057).
marginally significantp = 0.0571.1× alphagold
In addition, a marginally significant decrease was found in BDI-II (Z = −2.525, p = 0.057, corrected, effect size = 0.310) and the BUT_BIC subscale (Z = −2.375, p = 0.068, effect size = 0.292), as well as a significant increase in the scores of BUT_PSDI (Z = −5.012, p < 0.001, effect size = 0.616), SF_PF (Z = −2.245, p = 0.073, effect size = 0.276), and SF_PAIN (Z = −2.597, p = 0.057, effect size = 0.319).
marginally significantP = 0.0571.1× alphagold
Results Behavioral data The repeated-measures ANOVA for the mean RTs showed significant main effects of concept level ( F (1, 17) = 39.642, P < 0.001, η 2 P = 0.7), self-relevance ( F (1, 17) = 11.338, P = 0.004, η 2 P = 0.4) and a marginally significant interaction between concept level and self-relevance ( F (1, 17) = 4.158, P = 0.057, η 2 P = 0.197).
marginally significantp = 0.05711.1× alphagold
In the left TA, the nature of the LLR depended on the polarity, and a significant difference was observed in the amplitude of the responses obtained between RCathode and LCathode at 1 T ( p < 0.0001, Cd = 6.1) but was marginally significant at 1.5 T ( p = 0.0571, Cd = 0.89; Figure 3D ).
marginally significantp = 0.05721.1× alphagold
Almost all of the 18 models with SCL-90-dimension scores as the dependent variables showed that the level of mental health problems increased with the accumulation of COVID-19 cases, except for the model for the psychoticism dimension among Wuhan users, which was marginally significant ( p = 0.0572), and for the model for the interpersonal sensitivity dimension among non-Wuhan users, which was not significant ( p = 0.6843).
marginally significantP = 0.05748921.1× alphagold
Hence, using two-factor repeated-measures ANOVA across time, the lower Mtb load in co-cultured macrophages as well as macrophages co-cultured with LAG-3 silenced blood-derived T-cells, was marginally significant ( P = 0.0574892) relative to infected macrophages ( P <0.01) at 96h ( Fig 3A ).