“marginally significant”

Sensitivity analyses Sensitivity analyses based on multiple imputation data showed highly similar results; for example, all significant results reported above were also significant except for physical quality of life, which became marginally significant ( P = 0.057).

The difference between groups 2 and 3 was, however, marginally significant, P = 0.057 (Table 3 ). 10 months The groups from neurological assessments at 10 months CA did not differ on any kinematic variables; however, differences were found for aiming, F(3,53) = 3.107, P < 0.05 (Table 4 ).

In the 450 ms delay condition, there was a marginally significant effect, t 26 = 1.992, p = 0.057.

Partner identity interacted with gender to produce a marginally significant trend ( F 2,19 = 3.35, P = 0.057, Fig. 2 ) in the proportion of handling attempts that ended in successful consumption of food.

The difference between public and faith-based facilities is marginally significant ( p = 0.057), and no longer so when adjusted.

However, the differences in discharge rates between the two occupational types tended to be marginally significant after adjusting for others covariates ( P -value=0.057) (Figure 3 , C).

Older adults had overall smaller volumes compared to younger adults, with the largest age effects in PU ( F (1,35) = 35.5, P < 0.001, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\eta_{{\text{p}}}^{2}$$\end{document} η p 2 = 0.46), and a marginally significant effect in GP ( F (1,35) = 3.85, P = 0.057, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\eta_{{\text{p}}}^{2}$$\end{document} η p 2 = 0.09).

We also observed a marginally significant interaction of expression and group F (10,225) = 1.83, p = .057, η p 2 = 0.08.

But the difference in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome was marginally significant ( p = 0.057).

In addition, a marginally significant difference in age was found among the three groups [ F (2, 56) = 3.023, p = 0.057, η p 2 = 0.097], and the lCI group had higher age than the eCI group [ p = 0.094].

A marginally significant effect of mindset was found, F (1, 68) = 3.74, p = 0.057, η p 2 = 0.05.

The Emotion × Group Interaction was marginally significant, F (1,87) = 3.73, p = .057, η p 2 = .041, d Z = .21. 4 The priming score for ingroup happy faces ( M = 3.15, SD = 5.70) exceeded that for Middle-Eastern happy faces ( M = 1.05, SD = 5.37, see Table 1 ), t (87) = 2.46, p = .016, whereas ingroup ( M = −0.91, SD = 5.06) and outgroup ( M = −0.88, SD = 6.32) fearful faces were comparable in terms of mean priming scores; t (87) = −0.04 , p = . 970.

Interestingly, this effect was also present for unstudied word pairs in the omission block ( t (459) = 3.33, p < 0.001, d = 0.16), and was marginally significant in the offloading block ( t (462) = 1.91, p = 0.057, d = 0.09), but not present in the choice block.

There was a marginally significant effect for Mandarin vocabulary as a predictor of the trilinguals' Mandarin RC performance: χ 2 (1) = 3.09, p = 0.079 and a marginal significance for Cantonese vocabulary as a predictor of the trilinguals' Cantonese RC performance: Cantonese χ 2 (1) = 3.62, p = 0.057), showing that, unsurprisingly, children's RC comprehension in a language improved as their vocabulary scores in the target language increased.

The encoding time for initial fixations was 214ms ( SD = 23ms) for the upper screen and 220ms ( SD = 21ms) for the lower screen; this difference is marginally significant, t (14) = 2.08, p = .057.

There was a marginally significant effect of WM load, F (2,87) = 2.95, p = 0.057, η p 2 = 0.064.

For the season (Grain yield 1), the quadratic component of the inoculant rate response was not significant ( p = 0.358) when analyzed across varieties, but the Rate 2 × Variety interaction was marginally significant ( p = 0.057), indicating some variation in curvature among varieties.

The association between serum albumin and UR occurrence was not significant but marginally significant ( P = .057).

The interaction effect between skill level and AOI was marginally significant ( F (1.69, 28.78) = 3.33, p = 0.057, η p 2 = 0.16, ε = 0.42).

The location–instruction interaction was marginally significant ( F (2,22) = 3.303; p = 0.057; η 2 = 0.231; BF 10 = 0.335), resulting from presaccadic enhancement (increased peak-SF during saccade preparation relative to fixation) surviving FDR correction only for the horizontal ( t = 3.082; p = 0.031; d = 0.728) and the upper vertical ( t = 3.082; p = 0.031; d = 0.728) meridian ( Fig. 6 b ).

Finally, there was a marginally significant two-step indirect effect between capitalization attempts and positive emotions via perceived active-constructive feedback and optimism, b = 0.002, SE = 0.001, p =.057.

Sensitivity analyses showed that excluding days with alcohol or cannabis use did not change the model structure, though the effect of daily stress on sleep duration became marginally significant ( p = 0.057).

conducted another meta‐analysis and their results indicated a marginally significant effect of the Met allele on increasing PTSD risk (OR = 1.20; 95% CI = 0.99–1.26; p =.057).

In terms of RT data, we found a marginally significant three-way interaction effect ( F (6,192) = 2.63, p = 0.057), along with significant main effects for price level ( F (6,192) = 5.66, p < 0.05), but not for group ( F (1,32) = 0.002 p = 0.96) and product type ( F (1, 32) = 0.02, p = 0.89).

There were marginally significant differences in MMSE score among before tDCS, after 7 times tDCS, and after 14 times tDCS [ F (1,58) = 3.782, p = 0.057]; the results of multiple comparisons show that the MMSE score after 14 times tDCS ( m = 24.44 ± 4.105) was marginally significantly higher than that before tDCS ( m = 21.33 ± 5.453) [ p = 0.057].