“marginally significant”

In the subgroup analysis including more invasive surgical procedure (laminectomies involving more than three levels of instrumentation and laminectomies with tumor removal), the results remain robust, except for the postoperative bowel ileus that GDT provided promising result with marginally significant effect ( p =0.058) ( Supplement 1 ).

In a similar vein, two-sample t -tests between 6-year-old TD and 8-year-old ASD children showed a marginally significant effect for saccades between the target and the relational location, t (43.74) = 1.95, p = 0.058, but no effects for saccades between the target and the non-relational location, t (44) = 0.82, p = 0.419.

Global Disorganization of CT Networks in HA Patients Among the four morphological networks examined, only the CT network showed marginally significant differences in shortest path length among the three groups ( F = 2.872, p = 0.058).

e regression-estimated change was 0.01 percentage points; P = 0.617; see Model 2), iii) had no significant impact on whether a borrower made at least one, on-time payment (the regression-estimated change was −0.02 percentage points; P = 0.530, see Model 3), and iv) decreased 60-d delinquencies by a marginally significant 0.05 percentage points ( P = 0.058; see Model 4).

Additionally, there was a marginally significant interaction between the two for pro-social positive emotion, F (10, 388) = 1.808, p = 0.058, η p 2 = 0.045.

HAMA as a time-dependent variable was not significant for EFS ( p = 0.564) but marginally significant for OS ( p = 0.058).

A marginally significant treatment-by-group interaction ( F 1,26 = 3.54, p = 0.058, η p 2 = 0.116 ) emerged.

The correlation between SD and RA was marginally significant ( r = 0.09, p = 0.058). 3.2.

For the ACC, however, a marginally significant difference was observed in the control group (negative vs neutral: 0.12 vs −0.14, P = 0.058; positive vs neutral: 0.04 vs −0.14, P = 0.333) but not in the pain group (negative vs neutral: −0.26 vs −0.15, P = 0.644; positive vs neutral: −0.29 vs −0.15, P = 0.454).

The two-way interaction between group and animacy was marginally significant (F(1, 22) = 4.142; p = 0.058; η 2 = 0.02).

The regression model explained 14.0% of the variance in this criterion variable, which was marginally significant [ F (3, 49) = 2.668, p = 0.058].

Pre-training CDT scores predicted training clusters [ β = 0.283 , S D = 0.096 , Z = 2.940 , p < 0.01 ] and a marginally significant relation emerged between training performance (cluster) and anxiety improvement β = 0.157 , S D = 0.083 , Z = 1.893 , p = 0.058 .

Patients living in Riyadh had lower total scores (130.5±42.1 versus 150.8±57.4), which was marginally significant ( p =0.058).

At a concentration of 40 μM of compound 121 (comparable to 500 μg/mL of the extract), there was only a marginally significant inhibition of NO production (20%, P = 0.058). 86 This study explored the effect of multiple doses of the extract and isolated 121 on NO levels in an inflammatory model; however, the study was only conducted at the in vitro level.

Fritz’s D parameter was 0.482, and we detected a marginally significant departure from Brownian motion structure ( p = 0.058), whereas the probability of D resulting from Brownian motion structure was p = 0.165.

The interaction term between Wave 2 sleep duration and Wave 2 cognitive function showed a marginally significant positive prediction for Wave 3 mental health ( β = −0.058, t = −1.897, p = 0.058).

Although an increase was observed in Zn group, it became marginally significant with a slight difference compared to the reference ( p =.058).

VAS stress showed a marginally significant negative effect on integral MVC ( β = −0.007, SE = 0.004, t = −1.902, p = 0.058), indicating that each unit increase in stress was associated with an approximate 1.71% reduction in %MVC·s.

The simple effects analysis indicated that the amplitude of P200 at Fz was greater (marginally significant) than the delayed selection ( p = 0.058) in the group with negative body image at fatness subscale, but not in the control group.

The effect of face-valence was qualified by a marginally significant interaction between age and word-valence [ F (3,7468) = 2.500, p = 0.058], with the difference between the response times for positive-word and negative-word trials being the greatest in the younger age groups, and diminishing with increasing age.

A two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (Sex×Kissing) revealed only a significant main effect of Sex for average spectral power at the individual maximum, F(1,28) = 4.6, P<0.05, η 2 = 0.14, and a marginally significant main effect of Sex for average spectral power across 60 Hz, F(1,28) = 3.9, P = 0.058, η 2 = 0.12, indicating a higher spectral lip EMG power in women than in men.

There was positive but marginally significant correlation between the proportion of Beijing genotype isolates and that of male general population in corresponding geographic units ( r = 0.23, P = 0.058).

In NT children, the interaction between L2 proficiency and comparison [b] was significant (Estimate = 0.201, SE = 0.073, z = 2.743, p = 0.006; Table A in Appendix S6 ), with a marginally significant positive effect of L2 proficiency on gM sentences ( p = 0.058; Table B in S6 ).

Further stratification by proband’s sex revealed stronger positive, marginally significant correlation with t-DHEA ( ρ = 0.54, P = 0.058) among males with female probands.

Diabetes mellitus was marginally significant ( p < 0.058) in a study by Chen et al, 1 but was not significant in the present study.