A marginally significant positive association was observed for LPO (b = 5.77, SE = 1.58, p = 0.058 ), although this effect did not reach conventional statistical significance and should be interpreted cautiously.
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
A likelihood ratio test comparing this unconstrained model (M3 in Table 7 ) to the most constrained model (M1) was marginally significant ( Δ χ ( Δ d f = 2 ) 2 = 5.68, p = 0.058), ΔRMSEA = 0.01, ΔCFI = 0.01.
Paired contrasts suggested marginally significant reductions (α < 0.1) of nymphs on trees treated with Actigard in 2015 compared with untreated controls ( t = 2.1; df = 1, 192; P = 0.058; Fig. 2A , right panel).
In the case of N, a similar but much weaker pattern of associations was observed so that only in the case of years of education was the interaction marginally significant (p = 0.058).
The correlation between SD and RA was marginally significant ( r = 0.09, p = 0.058). 3.2.
There was a marginally significant interaction between habitat type and year on non‐native richness ( p = 0.058) in the direction of non‐native species increasing more rapidly in anthropogenic parks, but otherwise habitat type did not have a significant impact on richness, abundance, or proportion of native individuals ( p > 0.09).
The positive joint effect of soda intake and smoking on COPD was marginally significant ( p = 0.058).
41 There was a main effect of DHA on boundary-based place memory, which was marginally significant ( t = −2.017, P = 0.058).
The expression of RiMST2 and RiPT in the +M plants showed a similar trend to P status, with significant or marginally significant ( P = 0.058) decreases by LP in the late growth stage but no significant effects in the early growth stage.
An analysis of extracted signal change from these voxels showed greater activity on near-misses compared to full-misses on participant-chosen trials (t 14 = 3.37, p = 0.005), with a marginally significant effect in the opposite direction on computer-chosen trials (t 14 = −2.06, p = 0.058; see Figure 4 ).
Planned paired samples t -tests showed a marginally significant decrease in accuracy on the last sets during hypoxia compared to normoxia [ t (28) = 1.979, p = 0.058, d = 0.37], but no difference between conditions on the first sets [ t (28) = −1.019, p = 0.317].
There was a marginally significant effect of motion type, F(1,56) = 3.74, p<.058, Partial Eta Squared = .06, such that flying participants reported more presence than helicopter participants.
Decision times The main effect of fairness was marginally significant, F (1, 30) = 3.90, P = .058, η p 2 = 0.12 (see Fig. 2 ), indicating that participants completed decisions more quickly for fair offers (588.85 ± 139.46 ms) than unfair (609.01 ± 135.79 ms).
A marginally significant trend was observed for A. platensis ( p = 0.058).
The correlation between the mean AD in the left ILF and IES of the Mandarin visual rhyming judgment task within bilinguals was marginally significant with p = 0.058 (see Supplementary Table 1 ).
Surgical approach for colorectal surgery ( Figure 2 ) resulted marginally significant for OS ( p = 0.058).
Children from higher-income households were more likely to be in Profile 2 (normative functioning) than in Profile 1 “Relative weakness in all domains” (see Table 3 ), though findings were marginally significant (OR=0.55, p =0.058).
This is also suggested by the fact that their analysis also amplifies the effect in the pre-article time window (a marginally significant effect at p=0.058), so it might just be ‘amplifying noise’ (by amplifying the between-item differences at the lower end of the cloze scale), and does not yield a significant effect when we used the original DUK baseline.
In addition, we can note a marginally significant result (p = 0.058) for the intervention effect in reducing the prevalence of lack of control over drinking behavior (OR adj = 0.55, 95%CI 0.30–1.02).
rs6498169 showed a marginally significant trend between HT subjects and control group under codominant model ( P = 0.058), dominant model ( P = 0.054) and under recessive model ( P = 0.050).
Moreover, linear regression analysis indicates that the decrease in CD63 intensity is marginally significant for both systems ( p = 0.058 for ON-Chip and p = 0.10 for OFF-Chip).
Analysis of accuracy revealed marginally significant effects for target presence [present: .91 ± .01, absent: .93 ± .01; F (1, 26) = 3.93, p = .058, ŋ 2 p = .13] and for the interaction between condition and target presence, F (1, 26) = 3.89, p = .059, ŋ 2 p = .13, which showed a trend for higher accuracy for safe versus avoidance conditions in target absent trials.
The simple effects analysis indicated that the amplitude of P200 at Fz was greater (marginally significant) than the delayed selection ( p = 0.058) in the group with negative body image at fatness subscale, but not in the control group.
Although there was only a marginally significant interaction between age group and gender, F (1,153) = 3.66, p = 0.058, η p 2 = 0.02, tests of simple effects indicate that gender differences in donating are significant for 4-year-olds only ( Table 2 ).
A two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (Sex×Kissing) revealed only a significant main effect of Sex for average spectral power at the individual maximum, F(1,28) = 4.6, P<0.05, η 2 = 0.14, and a marginally significant main effect of Sex for average spectral power across 60 Hz, F(1,28) = 3.9, P = 0.058, η 2 = 0.12, indicating a higher spectral lip EMG power in women than in men.