“marginally significant”

However, based on the classification after the follow-up period, a marginally significant statistical difference could be observed between the ASD-NSIP and NSIP-Ab- groups (Figure 2 , p = 0.059).

The main effect of Group was marginally significant ( F (1, 83) = 3.657, p = 0.059, η 2 = .016).

While SC had a marginally significant effect on SCULT (H4: β = 0.111, t = 1.891, p = 0.059), its direct relationships with SK (H5: β = 0.053, t = 0.810, p = 0.418) and SP (H6: β = 0.096, t = 1.468, p = 0.142) were statistically nonsignificant.

Additionally, peak amplitude also decreased with age, although this effect was marginally significant ( F (1, 24) = 3.93, p = .059, η p 2 = .14).

For former smokers, the OR difference of the different NDVI groups was marginally significant ( P = 0.059).

The interaction was not observed with the SL measure of SVO ( F (1,404) = 0.83, p = .364), but was marginally significant when the participants were categorized to proselfs and prosocials [ 22 ] ( F (1,404) = 3.60, p = .059).

Regarding the FGW, there was a marginally significant interaction between group and assessment time ( F (1, 26) = 3895, p = 0.059, η 2 = 0.130).

For strepsipteran abundance, there was a positive but marginally significant effect of PC1 (z = 1.89, p = 0.059), while PC2 remained non-significant (z = −1.08, p = 0.28).

There was no significant difference in the slope between AM and ECM species ( P = 0.97), whereas the difference in the intercept was marginally significant ( P = 0.059) with the common slope; AM species had consistently lower LN than ECM species at a given SLA.

We observed a significant decrease in FAZ area ( P = 0.035) and an increase in foveal DCP-VD ( P = 0.022) but a marginally significant increase in foveal SCP-VD ( P = 0.059).

Nevertheless, there was a marginally significant difference (p = .059) between groups in the mean value of hyper-fair offers (>50% of the money offered to the other player).

They found that treatment with nesiritide was associated with a 74% increased risk of death within 30 days, though this increase was marginally significant (p = 0.059).

The relationship between standard length and visual detection threshold for the sediment treatment was found to be marginally significant ( t = 2.039, R 2 = 0.2171, P = 0.059), while length was not significant for any other treatment.

However, further correlation analysis revealed only a marginally significant correlation between 2D∶4D ratio measurements and impulsivity scores ( r (88) = −.202, p = .059) across all participants, and within the groups, a significant correlation among offenders ( r (42) = −.396, p = .009) but not nonoffenders ( r (46) = .119, p = .432).

An interaction between Group and Site was marginally significant [ χ ( 1 ) 2 = 3.57, p = 0.059].

We also found a marginally significant interaction effect between solution type and region, F (2, 48) = 3.410, p = 0.059, η p 2 = 0.124, and a significant interaction effect between region and laterality, F (2, 48) = 7.785, p = 0.001, η p 2 = 0.245.

Further adjustment for estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) and c-reactive protein (CRP) (Model-1B) attenuated all associations, leaving only KIM-1 marginally significant (p = 0.059).

On the other hand, participants who followed the relaxation instructions with the instrumental meditation music reported a marginally significant decrease in alertness ( p = .059, Bonferroni-corrected), whereas the opposite was observed for participants who followed the relaxation instructions with the drumming sequence ( p = .054, Bonferroni-corrected).

We found a significant difference between the conditions at 83%, t (22) = 2.319, p < 0.05, and a marginally significant difference at 17%, t (22) = −2.01, p = 0.059 (Figure 2 ), although none of the tests survived Bonferroni correction.

At the occipital sites, the learning effect was significant on the left hemisphere for the OL group (P = 0.028), and marginally significant on the right hemisphere for both groups (ML: P = 0.059; OL: P = 0.053) (see Figure 9 ).

Repeated measures ANOVA for Global Cognition revealed a marginally significant main effect of Time (F = 3.719, df = 1,54, p = .059) and a trend-level Treatment Group x Time interaction (F = 2.960, df = 1,54, p = .091) with small effect size ( d = 0.25).

However, this correlation was not found for monolinguals ( r = -0.318, p = 0.1) and was marginally significant for bilinguals when tested in their L1 ( r = 0.349, p = 0.059).

Also only among men, reflection directly and positively predicted integrative self-knowledge (β = .17, p < .001); the difference between regression coefficients in men and women was marginally significant ( t = 1.89, p = .059).

A marginally significant trend was also observed for TNK (RR 1.10 95% CI 1.0–1.21, p = 0.059) (Fig.

Past Surveillance Acceptance Another linear regression showed that prosocial responsibility was a marginally significant predictor of past surveillance acceptance, B = 0.07, SE = 0.04, β = 0.11, p = 0.059.