Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.0591.2× alphagold
Cdkn2a , which is located on chromosome 4, was affected by interstitial deletions in 15% and 24% and by copy-neutral LOHs in 19% and 0% of TLs in the 95 and 65 kcal groups, respectively; no terminal deletions were detected, and the total LOH frequency was 33% and 24%, respectively ( Table 1 ), indicating a marginally significant CR-related decrease in the frequency of copy-neutral LOHs ( p = 0.059).
marginally significantp = .0591.2× alphagold
We then tested our second hypotheses on the moderating effects of caregivers’ perspective taking and observed three effects on the association between receiving emotional support and PLWD’s hair cortisol ( β = 0.56, p = .003), the association between receiving practical support and PLWD’s hair cortisol ( β = −0.39, p = .013), and the association between receiving emotional support and PLWD’s DHEA-to-cortisol ratio ( β = −0.41, p = .059; marginally significant).
marginally significantP = 0.0591.2× alphagold
When classification task and action jointly switched, the associated full switch costs remained constant across immediate and remote tests in the wake group ( b = −10.58, t = −1.06, P = 0.288), whereas a marginally significant decrease was seen after sleep ( b = −18.93, t = −1.89, P = 0.059) ( Fig. 2 C).
Sleep consolidates stimulus-response learning.
Learn Mem · 2023 · PMC10547380
marginally significantp = .0591.2× alphagold
The interaction between the two factors, Group × Testing point, was marginally significant, F (1, 82) = 3.66, η p 2 = .04, p = .059, showing that the increase in finger use between pre‐ and post‐test tended to be higher for the experimental group (from 60.0% at pre‐test to 81.1% at immediate post‐test, +21.1%) than for the active control group (from 44.1% at pre‐test to 47.2% at immediate post‐test, +3.1%).
marginally significantp = 0.0591.2× alphagold
CNV type had a significantly overdispersed phylogenetic signal for a sequence similarity tree of the LRR codons of RPP8 (Bloomberg’s K = 0.504, p = 0.038, Figure S4 ), and a marginally significant phylogenetic signal for overdispersion on a tree of the non-LRR codons of RPP8 (Bloomberg’s K = 0.389, p = 0.059).
marginally significantp = .0591.2× alphagold
The inverted image yielded marginally significant differences in change ratios ( F (2,26) = 3.165, p = .059, η 2 = 0.196)(see Fig. 2 , bottom row).
Pareidolia in infants.
PLoS One · 2015 · PMC4331561