Marginally significant associations were found between Aix and LDL1 (r = 0.29, p = 0.059) ( Figure 1 d), TG (r = 0.27, p = 0.078), total cholesterol (r = 0.30, p = 0.058), and ApoB100 (r = 0.29, p = 0.057) in the patient group.
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
Additionally, a history of diabetes mellitus showed a marginally significant association (p = 0.059).
However, TNFAIP8 shows a marginally significant difference (P = 0.059), implying that higher WBC counts might be associated with elevated TNFAIP8 expression, though the other members do not display such associations.
However, the sense of presence was marginally significant in Model 2, β = 0.27, t = 1.95, p = 0.059.
However, the influence of drug on weights only at P5 for the Long and Short Prenatal animals was found to be marginally significant ( p = 0.059) and non-significant ( p = 0.304) in the ANCOVA model.
When partitioning DLBCL into GCB and ABC subtypes, the favorable prognostic effect of IGHV SHM high was significant in ABC-DLBCL and marginally significant in BCL2 -R − and MYC -R − GCB-DLBCL (for OS, P = 0.059 and 0.066, respectively; Additional file 1 : Figure S5c-d).
NSAC: Comparing NSAC and LTAA DAO, the multivariate test was marginally significant (Wilks' λ 7,111 = 0.887, p = .059), with smaller volumes in LTAA DAO for the accumbens (F 1,117 = 4.17. p = .043, es = 3.4), hippocampus (F 1,117 = 6.41, p = .013, es = 5.2), pallidum (F 1,117 = 5.08, p = .026, es = 4.2), putamen (F 1,117 = 4.92, p = .028, es = 4.0),and thalamus(F 1,117 = 4.90, p = .029, es = 4.06).
The correlation between the cumulative lengths of the optical maps assigned to each chromosome and the chromosome sizes of the old reference genome was marginally significant (Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.54, P -value = 0.059).
Our two-way ANOVA analysis detected marginally significant interactions in the core temperature between condition and exposure time ( F (4,83) = 2.367, p = 0.059).
MDF results The MDF euthanasia values of the osteotomized femur compared to the control femur are statistically significantly higher for all groups, i.e., sixth week (P < 0.001), eighth week (P < 0.001), 10th week (P = 0.026), and marginally significant at the 12th week (P = 0.059).
Pairwise comparisons of the two learning rates in each subgroup showed a significant difference between the two in the “Learning Charity” subgroup (t 6 = 8.53, p<0.0001) with greater learning rate for self than charity and a marginally significant difference between the two in the “Learning Self” subgroup (t 11 = −2.104, p = 0.059) with greater learning rate for charity than self.
A marginally significant association between cultivar resistance and response to metalaxyl was found (χ 2 = 9.10, df = 4, p = 0.059), whereas the frequency (27.4%) of metalaxyl-sensitivity among isolates collected from moderately P. infestans -resistant cultivars tended to be lower compared to susceptible (47.3%) and resistant cultivars (42.1%).
In the predining state ( Figures 10A – C ), for the item “I am extremely hungry right now” ( Figure 10A ), an ANOVA revealed a marginally significant main effect of music type ( F (2, 845) = 2.85, p = 0.059), and a marginal significance of the Time × Music interaction ( F (4, 1,690) = 2.04, p = 0.086).
There were also marginally significant decision * optode region * up–down placement [ F (3, 30) = 2.765, p = 0.059]; optode region * left–right * up–down placements [ F (1, 32) = 3.431, p = 0.073]; and for decision * optode region * left–right * up–down placements interactions [ F (3, 30) = 2.758, p = 0.060]. 3.1.3 Tests of within-subjects effects The results of tests of within-subjects effects indicate that there was a main effect for the optode region [ F (2.646, 84.675) = 5.392, p = 0.002].
There was a marginally significant relation of hippocampal volume with both nigral (−0.52 cm 3 , P = 0.059) and limbic (−0.38 cm 3 , P = 0.051) Lewy bodies.
When we assessed the interaction between adherence to the Mediterranean diet and being a healthcare professional, we found only a marginally significant p for interaction ( p = 0.059) for test-diagnosed COVID-19 infection.
Manipulation check An exact McNemar's test determined that there was only a marginally significant difference in the proportion of participants who dismissed notifications during a task (68.27%) compared to after a task (71.77%), p = .059.
In the same figures, the characteristic curvatures of the response surfaces illustrate a negative quadratic effect of inhibitors on Y SQU, which were marginally significant for DPA and MI ( p = 0.059 and 0.080, respectively), and significant for TH ( p = 0.031) ( Table S5 ).
∆ α demonstrated excellent variance homogeneity ( p = 0.9258) with marginally significant group differences ( p = 0.0591).
There was a marginally significant difference in the prognosis between patients with scores of 1 and 2 (p = 0.0592, Log rank test).
Comparison of the distribution of single versus multiple HCMV genotypes between distinct clinical specimens showed a marginally significant difference (χ 2 = 15; p = 0.0592).
However, the marginally significant p -value ( p = 0.0593) of the ARB/AML interaction term could indicate a negative interaction, implying that the effect of the combination drug was less than the sum of the component effects.
The organic matter percentage showed marginally significant differences ( F = 3.7418; p = 0.0594; Fig. 5 ) for the LUI being controlled by the volume and age.
<0.1 We found that interaction between language and word entropy both for acoustic and phonemic features which were marginally significant (p=0.0596 for phonemic features and p=0.056 for acoustic features).
Mangrove sediment samples showed a similar pattern to the seagrass meadows and the presence of allochthonous sources had a marginally significant positive effect on the amount of CaCO 3 in the sediment ( t -value = 4.29, df = 1.81, p = 0.0596).