“marginally significant”

The interaction between emotion and location was still marginally significant, F (2,13) = 3.141, p = 0.060.

In that model, irrigation did not clearly impact beetle richness ( β = 0.48, p = 0.60) and bulk density had only a marginally significant negative effect on beetle richness ( β = −0.08, p = 0.06).

According to non-parametric tests for the data showing ceiling effects, the accuracy of the easier questions was significantly higher for the Note group than the Tablet group (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, W = 179, p = 0.04), and the difference between the Note and Device groups was marginally significant ( W = 164, p = 0.06).

For late GU toxicity, the only predictor for grade 1–2 toxicity that was marginally significant was bladder D1% ( p = 0.06) and for grade 3–4 toxicity, bladder D15cc ( p = 0.09) in UVA.

Baseline IL-6 was a marginally significant factor ( F 2,488 = 2.70, p = 0.06) suggesting greater reactivity in individuals with lower baseline IL-6 levels compared to those with higher levels at 75 min ( p = 0.02) but not at 45 min post-stress ( p = 0.16).

The Group × Sex interaction effect on FFM of the Right Arm was marginally significant ( F (1,71) = 3.71, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.05), suggesting a potential moderating role of sex in the observed effect.

In terms of the occurrence of mixed lesions, the risk was 11.86 times higher in the RA group than in the C group, and there were marginally significant odds for the AS group (OR = 8.93, 95% CI = 0.91–87.27, p = 0.060) compared to the C group.

Notably, we observed a significant difference in species richness (number of species) in CRC patients compared to controls (b = 4.19, 95 % CI: (1.51, 6.86), p = 2.20e-03) and a marginally significant difference in species diversity (Shannon entropy) (b = 0.07, 95 % CI: (-2.62e-03, 0.14), p = 0.06).

There was also a marginally significant statistical difference between studies that were published before 2000 and those published after ( p = 0.06).

Significant association was found in CMT, EZ disruption, DRIL, and ELM disruption ( Table 2 ). Marginally significant association was found in deep parafoveal VD ( p = 0.06).

Living alone at baseline is considered a risk factor for a larger number of falls at the end of the study ( p = 0.004), and age is marginally significant at 6 months ( p = 0.060). 4.

Compared to patients not reporting ACE and anxiety comorbidity, the ACE + Anxiety group had elevated B cell, T cell, and macrophage infiltration, although this was marginally significant ( p = 0.06).

The extraoral appliance subgroup (ρ = −0.45, P = 0.22) and minor subgroup (ρ = −0.25, P = 0.06, marginally significant) showed the same negative trend but did not reach conventional statistical significance, likely due to their smaller sample sizes.

Multiple regression analyses or multiple ordinal logistic regression analysis did not show significant interaction of ZnO-NPs exposure level and Nrf2 deletion for the above parameters, thus multiple regression model without the interaction was applied for them, although marginally significant interaction is noted for neutrophils ( p = 0.06) as it indicates different effect of ZnO-NP exposure level depending on the genotype.

reported that, among patients, having family members infected by SARS was a marginally significant predictive factor ( p = 0.06) of having psychotic disorder during the treatment phase [ 20 ].

The analysis revealed a significant agency×context×ROI interaction for the first onset, (F(2,19) = 5.14, p<.05), and a marginally significant agency×context×ROI interaction for the second onset (F(2,19) = 3.85, p = .06).

There was a marginally significant positive relationship between private allelic richness and forest cover ( z = 1.86, P = 0.06).

Statistical comparisons of the overall frequency distribution among the youngest age group with the two older age groups and the euploid sample were statistically significant (p = 0.02, p = 0.02 and p = 0.0005, respectively) and marginally significant between the middle and older age groups (p = 0.06).

Group × bone × site interactions BR is the only variable that demonstrated a marginally significant ( p = .06) group × bone × site interaction, where the DMPN&CN's distal site BR on the fifth metatarsal averaged 4.5 (highest), resulting in the lowest resistance to fracture (Fig. 2 ).

Simple effect analysis showed that significant or marginally significant differences between the valid and invalid locations occurred at electrodes P4, P7, and P8 (P4v-i = − 0.507 μV, p = 0.06; P7v-i = − 0.506 μV, p < 0.01; P8v-i = − 0.538 μV, p < 0.05), and a significant maximum difference between the valid and invalid locations was found in the P8 electrode (− 0.538 μV).

A marginally significant difference in the concentration of 5-HIAA [ F (2, 31) = 2.987, p = 0.06] was detected among the three groups.

2 , follow-up contrasts with Tukey HSD correction for multiple comparisons confirmed that all devices captured significantly different levels of amplitude (marginally significant when comparing baseline versus headset: M Headset = 59.73 dB, M Baseline = 57.67 dB, t = 2.73, p = .06).

Results Internal consistency was modest, but similar to the original value (alpha = 0.62), and test-retest correlation at four months follow-up was moderately encouraging for a short instrument such as this (n = 31, test retest intraclass correlation = 0.58), and change at the mean level was minimal, but marginally significant (from an average of 3.3 to 3.8, p = 0.06).

In the final multivariate model, only gender was found to be significant (p = 0.02), while physical illness was marginally significant (p = 0.06) Discussion To our knowledge this is the first study from Pakistan that measures the prevalence estimate of anxiety using a validated instrument.

The difference in these linear trends was marginally significant ( P = .06).