“marginally significant”

At the between-individual level, vTST showed a marginally significant negative association with dTST (β = −247.86, p = 0.060; Table 4 ), suggesting that individuals with lower total sleep time variability tended to show greater sleep perception bias.

In general, women attributed greater importance to each motivation than did men, with some exceptions: men and women rated wanting both to improve health and look good for a significant other similarly (p = .11 and .42, respectively), and men assigned greater importance to attracting a significant other—although this difference was marginally significant (3.19 vs. 2.70, p = .06).

undulatus females when described by the PC spectral analysis ( figure 5 ), significantly so in terms of brightness (Tukey post hoc : p < 0.001) and marginally significant in terms of UV reflectance (Tukey post hoc : p = 0.06).

The difference between trials following a nongamble and trials following a gambled win was marginally significant (two-tailed p = .06; one-tailed: p = .03).

Results were marginally significant for acceptance ( F 1,93 = 2.59; p = .06; partial η 2 = .05) and non-significant for glycated hemoglobin ( F 1,93 = 0.54; p = .58; partial η 2 = .01).

S2 ), and LNP participants showing a marginally significant decrease ( p = 0.06) (Fig. 6 b).

In a multivariate model, percentage change in tumor size at the first assessment was a marginally significant positive predictor for PFS ( P = .06).

There was a marginally significant trend towards increasing HRV in the propranolol group ( F 1,216.8 = 3.72, P = 0.06).

The correlation coefficient for the Dutch elderly population was marginally significant (ρ = -0.40, p-value = 0.06).

ANOVA also revealed marginally significant interaction between self-referential type and caudality [ F (8,136) = 2.78, p = 0.06].

The number of osteomyelitis-related hospitalizations showed a marginally significant positive association ( β = 0.237, OR = 1.268, 95%CI: 0.990 ~ 1.623, p = 0.060), suggesting that increased hospitalizations might contribute to attitude formation, though it did not reach statistical significance.

A marginally significant association was found between foreign nationality and low SES (χ 2 (1) = 3.573, p = .06).

Effects of condition order The main effect of the condition completed first in the experiment was marginally significant, (accuracy: F (3,48) = 2.68, P = 0.06, number of trials: F (3,48) = 2.56, P = 0.07); participants who completed the novel objects/arbitrary relations condition first had lower accuracy ( M = 0.85, SE = 0.02) and required more trials ( M = 80, SE = 5.7) than the participants who completed the three other conditions (accuracy: M = 0.90, SE = 0.02, number of trials: range = 68–74, for other three conditions).

These are the transition between Cyanobacteria ( Scytonema and Gloeocapsa ) and the lichen community with Pyxine (B-E), which resulted in the co-occurrence analysis as marginally significant (p value ~ 0.06).

The interaction between ER time windows and groups was marginally significant (F(3,75) = 2.52, p = 0.06) ( Figure 4 ).

Additionally, we performed subgroup analysis according to specific TAs and found that the use of anti-VEGF agents significantly improved PFS (HR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.69–0.96, P =0.012) and a marginally significant PFS benefits for anti-EGFR agents (HR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.79–1.01, P =0.06).

The cultural Group × Video target interaction was marginally significant, F (1, 84) = 3.80, p = .06, η p 2 = .04.

Conversely, when the multifrequency background pattern was presented at 20% contrast for the lowest spatial frequency target of 0.25 cyc/deg (complexity levels 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Table 2 ), contrast sensitivity was lower, being marginally significant [ t (21) = −1.99, p = 0.06], which is expected because at 20% contrast, the background activates parvocellular neurons more than magnocellular neurons (Kaplan and Shapley, 1986 ), making the task more difficult.

Lastly, while the action observation effect was present in all participants, the effect of emotion was observed in adults but not in late adolescents, although the interaction was marginally significant ( p < 0.06).

An ANOVA for all task stages identified a marginally significant stress effect only for the RL stage ( F (1,50) = 3.707, p = 0.060).

No other factor had a significant effect, except gall attacks for the assumed error rate of 0.1% (severely attacked trees had lower fecundities), while fruiting intensity had a marginally significant effect ( P -value = 0.06, higher male fecundity for trees producing more fruits).

Blacks had marginally significant higher depressive symptoms (1.59 ± 0.65 vs. 1.54 ± 0.59, p = 0.06).

The difference between the Cooperative/Competitive and Altruistic treatments and the Atomistic and Control treatments is marginally significant ( p = 0.06) during the first month, but becomes insignificant as the treatments converge over time (see Fig. 9 ).

The final eradication rate was 80.0% (n=90) for the period before the test introduction, and 88.9% (n=144) for the period after it; the difference was marginally significant (χ 2 =3.52, p=0.06), which was similar to a previous result (p=0.08). 2 ) The eradication rate was 100% (n=53) among those with CYP2C19 *1*1 treated by the second-line regimen ( Table 3 ).

To assess HI effects independent of temperature modulation, a 4 (Area) × 2 (Sex) × 2 (Treatment; HI normothermic and sham) repeated measures ANOVA revealed a significant Sex × Treatment interaction [ F (1,37) = 5.621, p < 0.05], as well as a marginally significant Sex effect [ F (1,37) = 3.748, p = 0.06] and Area × Sex interaction [ F (1,37) = 2.996, p = 0.09].