While no significant interaction was detected for total AAs ( p = 0.381), interaction trends emerged for specific categories: essential AAs (EPAA) approached significance ( p = 0.116), and non‐proteinogenic AAs showed a marginally significant interaction ( p = 0.060).
Pairwise post-hoc analysis with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons [ 36 ] revealed significantly reduced trabecular bone mineral density in ovariectomized (0.11±0.0088 g/cm 3 ; mean rank difference 9.0, p<0.001) and AP-treated groups (0.15±1.85 g/cm 3 ; mean rank difference 7.0, p<0.001) relative to sham (0.26±0.028 g/cm 3 ) but only a marginally significant difference between sham and the ALEN -treated ovariectomized rat values (0.19±0.0058 g/cm 3 ; mean rank difference 3.5, p=0.06).
34 had a marginally significant difference between the US and LM group ( p = 0.06).
A marginally significant main effect of response set overlap was found, F (1.22, 105.10) = 3.473, p = .06, η p 2 = .04, driven by more excluded trials in the overlapping ( M = 10%, SD = 9%) than in the control condition ( M = 7%, SD = 12%), t (86) = 2.53, p = .04, Cohen’s d = .27.
After the phylogenetically independent contrasts (PICs), the negative linear relationships were still significant in 2018 (R 2 = 0.34, p < 0.05) and marginally significant in 2019 (R 2 = 0.45, p = 0.06), which indicated that the phylogenetic effect did not change the trade-off relationships ( Table S1 ).
A Mantel test showed a positive correlation between the genetic differentiations (F ST ) and the linearized geographic distances with a marginally significant statistical support (Euclidean distance; r = 0.3, p = 0.06; Figure 2 ).
Preliminary Analyses Parental background variables (i.e., parents’ age and education at the time of their child’s birth) and adolescent background variables (i.e., age at the adolescence assessment and intelligence scores measured at 13.5 years of age) did not correlate with any of the dependent variables, r s < 0.20, p s > 0.15, except for mother’s years of education, which had a marginally significant correlation with adolescents’ N2 amplitude at age 17 years, r = −0.25, p = 0.06; therefore, it was controlled in further analyses.
Significant increases in gene expression were observed by RT-qPCR for the microarray up-regulated genes psaB , gdhA , glnQ , sp_0858 , pdx1 and sp_1992 (p<0.05), marginally significant for sp_1914 (p = 0.06) and insignificant for the remaining eight genes (p>0.05).
Wilcoxon rank-sum tests showed that there were no significant differences between the unilateral and bilateral groups in the number of trials (p = 0.59), the duration (p = 0.22), the number of rewarded trials (p = 0.84), or the reaction time from the go-signal (p = 0.9), although the difference in the ratio of rewarded trials was marginally significant (p = 0.06). c-Fos-positive cell density maps Figure 3 shows c-Fos-positive cell density maps (PCDMs) at five levels for each of the three task groups.
SHAPS The repeated-measures ANCOVA for SHAPS yielded a marginally significant within-subjects main effect of time ( F 1,789 = 3.54, P = .06, η p 2 = .004), and a significant time*user-group interaction effect ( F 1,789 = 6.49, P = .01, η p 2 = .008) in the direction of greater increase in scores from before to after lockdown for controls compared with users.
Additionally, the effect of word type was marginally significant [F (1,48) = 3.87, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.07], with participants tending to respond more accurately to SN word pairs than to NN word pairs.
Results yielded a marginally significant effect of condition, F (3, 116) = 2.56, p = .06, ŋ p 2 = .06, with the moving group reporting more intrusions than did the professor stereotype group (see Table 1 ).
The relationship between the number of kangaroo rats per site and SNV prevalence was marginally significant (GLM, coefficient = 0.48, F 1, 39 = 3.86, P = 0.06).
The main effect of outcome frequency (50% and 80% error rate conditions) was marginally significant ( F 1, 23 = 3.91, p = 0.06), showing that slower RT in the 50% (840 ± 20 ms) than in the 80% (833 ± 20 ms) error rate condition.
There was a significant reduction in risk of type 2 diabetes among women who had a family history of diabetes (RR 0.77 [95% CI 0.60–0.99]; P = 0.04) but not among those who had no such family history (1.09 [0.85–1.41]; P = 0.49), and the interaction was marginally significant ( P = 0.06).
There was also marginally significant effect of item-type, F(1,54) = 3.839, p<0.06, which reflected the children's overall better performance on the even numbers – 2, 4 & 6 – than the odd numbers – 3, 5 & 7 – in both the pre- and post-tests.
In contrast, I bs was only a relatively weak and marginally significant (Beta = 0.180, p = 0.06) predictor of female obesity prevalence ( Table 5 ).
Results Behavioral data We found a marginally significant main effect of S2 task type ( F (1, 17) = 4.09, p < .06, η 2 = .19), showing that responses for the word task (mean, 1065 ms; SD, 40) were faster than the color task (mean, 1112 ms; SD, 37).
Furthermore, there was a marginally significant interaction effect of group x phobia relevance, F (1,106) = 3.67, p = 0.06, η 2 = 0.03.
alcohol consumption alcoholic liver cirrhosis sarcopenia Regarding the proportion of patients with ALC and non‐ALC in each age group among patients with sarcopenia, there was a marginally significant trend among the three groups ( P = 0.060; Fig. 2a ).
elegans eggs between early and middle development, and a marginally significant 11% increase ( p = .06) between middle and late development eggs (Figure 5 ).
2a , Table 1a ) revealed a significant main effect of validity ( F (1, 64) = 100.85, p < 0.001), with faster responses under valid than invalid conditions, and a marginally significant effect of target ( F (1, 64) = 8.18, p = 0.06), with faster responses under the voice than the tone condition; however, there was no significant effect involving group ( F (1, 64) = 0.42, p = 0.52).
The difference between conditions in attributing ethnic stereotypes to environmental causes was marginally significant, F(2, 1157) = 2.82, p = .060, η 2 = .005.
This relationship was marginally significant when bare plots were excluded from the model ( P = 0.06).
Although the direct correlation between vascular lesions and end-stage renal disease is not entirely clear, a marginally significant association (log-rank test, p = 0.06) was observed with arterial wall thickening.