“marginally significant”

The risk group effect was marginally significant F(1, 97) = 3.71, p = 0.06, ηp 2 = 0.04, and there was no group*sex interaction F(1, 97) = 0.18, p = 0.67, ηp 2 = 0.002.

When comparing participants who had follow-up data to those who did not, baseline REAL-DQ scores on three subscales demonstrated marginally significant differences (Healthy Habits, p = .06; Managing Diabetes, p = .04; Emotions and Well-being, p = .06) with participants who scored higher at baseline being less likely to complete follow-up measures.

Concern about infections and awareness of bacterial accumulation did not differ significantly among education groups, despite a marginally significant correlation ( p = 0.060) between cleaning frequency and education levels.

When we examined alcohol use among patients with probable PTSD grouped by co-morbidity a marginally significant association (p=0.06) was evidenced.

This was not true for INT concepts, where no differences between those conditions were found (agents: M = 3.01, SE = 0.22, non-agents: M = 2.54, SE = 0.23), even though a similar, but marginally significant trend was observed (p = .06).

This difference was statistically marginally significant (P = 0.06).

The main effect of disease stage was significant for ONLT ( P = 0.04), marginally significant for NFLT and OPLT ( P = 0.06), and not statistically significant for INLT, ONLT, OSLT, RPET, and OSCT ( P ≥ 0.2).

Additionally, NHR showed a marginally significant mediation effect (7.26%; P = 0.060) on the risk of low eGFR ( Fig. 3 ).

Accordingly, in the paper of Robinson et al., in a multivariate model the percent change in tumor size at the first radiological tumor assessment was a marginally significant positive predictor for PFS ( p = 0.06) [ 16 ].

The miR-425 Cp value of the precipitation-based isolated urine EVs of healthy donors decreased at a marginally significant level ( p = 0.06) compared with that of the prostate cancer donors ( Figure 5 ).

The results for CES-D were somewhat anomalous, with three times higher odds of high CES-D scores indicating depression, though the results were marginally significant (p=0.06).

This model, F (3, 88) = 5.18, p = .002, f 2 = 0.18, resulted in a similar marginally significant nonverbal expression of shame by rurality interaction effect ( B std = 0.64, p = .06) with higher intensities of nonverbal expressions of shame at T1 predicting higher T2 suicidal ideation for rural ( B std = 0.73, p = 0.004) but not for urban ( B std = 0.09, p = 0.71) LGBTQ participants.

This relationship was marginally significant for those in racially homogeneous schools, r s (39) = .26, p = .06, but non-significant for those in racially heterogeneous schools, r s (29) = .16, p = .20.

Additionally, while the interaction effect for target absent RT was marginally significant ( p = 0.06), the Bayes factor provided “anecdotal evidence” in support of the alternative hypothesis.

Kaplan-Meier estimates showed that the difference between the overall survival curves of the three groups was marginally significant ( P =0.060; Fig. 4 ).

In contrast, symptoms that affect the brain were negatively linked to experiential factor—this last correlation was marginally significant (r(38) = -.30, p = .06).

An effect of task set was evident in a significant interaction between task set and congruency, F (1, 23) = 8.80, p = .007, η p 2 = 0.28, and a marginally significant three-way interaction between task set, configuration type, and congruency, F (1, 23) = 3.91, p = .06, η p 2 = 0.15.

There was a marginally significant difference in circulating T between species ( F 1,21 =3.82, P =0.06) and a significant difference in circulating T across breeding stages ( F 1,21 =4.84, P =0.04).

This correlation is significant ( r = 0.50, p = 0.013) when the MCI group is eliminated, and it remains marginally significant when it includes only the two elderly groups ( r = 0.45; p = 0.06), which show (at the group level) ARC-scores close to zero.

In contrast, confusion did not significantly predict exploratory behavior; however, in case of incorrect answers the path coefficient was positive and marginally significant ( p = 0.060).

Another cross-sectional study from the HABS has shown a marginally significant association between higher GDS score – driven by the anxiety-concentration subdomain – and lower glucose metabolism ( P = 0.06) [ 53 ].

The correlation with rumination was marginally significant ( p = 0.06) suggesting that it would reach significance in a larger sample.

Attention and processing speed The number of commission errors on the CPT was lower at post-treatment compared to baseline for both groups, represented by a marginally significant main effect of time ( F (1,16) = 3.9, p = .06, η 2 p = .199).

5 , 13 For instance, a large pooled analysis found only a weak, marginally significant association (hazard ratio = 1.09; 95% CI, 0.99–1.20; p = 0.06), suggesting any direct influence is likely minimal. 14 However, evidence remains inconsistent.

However, there was a marginally significant difference in SART reaction times (seconds) between T1 ( M = 0.37, SE = 0.008) and T2 ( M = 0.39, SE = 0.009), F (1, 48) = 3.60, p = 0.06, with the means indicating that the participants were slower on the SART task post-training. 4 Discussion AI-related technologies are developed with the goal of augmenting and improving human efficiency.