“marginally significant”

Furthermore, when analyzing effects of intra-articular injection of autologous, microfragmented adipose tissue two years after application, we noted that the extent of magnitude between positive and negative cases was uneven; average decrease was −16.2 ± 1.5%, while the average increase was 32.3 ± 21.9%, what was marginally significant when absolute values were used (P = 0.028).

However, the association between the incidence of CV events and follow-up duration assessed by a weighted linear regression was marginally significant only for fMI ( p -value = 0.028, R 2 = 28%) ( Supplementary Figure S3 ).

When parental self-efficacy was included in the model, it was observed that the direction of the path (path c′) representing the direct effect of perceived social support on psychological well-being changed and became marginally significant in the negative direction (B = −0.29, SE = 0.13, p = 0.028).

Similar but marginally significant association of R553W (rs755537970) variant was observed in combined samples with triglycerides (β 0.51± 0.23; p = 0.028).

) = 0.017, p = 4.5 × 10 −8 ], and for BD, there was a marginally significant correlation at −0.069 (fixed effect model: s.e. = 0.032, p = 0.028) with no statistical heterogeneities ( p > 0.05).

Time 4 (First Postoperative Day) rHb increased significantly over time ( p = 0.0001), and we observed a marginally significant regional difference ( p = 0.0285).

Moreover, after performing 10,000 permutations, the p value was marginally significant (codominant model p = 0.029, dominant model p = 0.027).

Similarly, while univariate analysis revealed associations between ctDNA concentration and clinical features (lymph node metastasis with oral rinse-derived ctDNA, p = 0.012; tumor site and T stage with plasma ctDNA, p = 0.010 and p = 0.032, respectively), multiple linear regression modeling for both oral rinse ( R 2 = 0.109) and plasma (R2 = 0.212) ctDNA did not demonstrate strong associations between baseline ctDNA values and these clinical features, although lymph node metastasis remained significant in oral rinse ( p = 0.006) and tumor site remained marginally significant in plasma ( p = 0.029) multivariate models (Supplementary Tables 4 , 5 ).

For chemical traits, total phenols exhibited marginally significant positive correlation ( p = 0.029), whereas tannin content showed significant negative correlation ( p = 0.001).

In the case of vertical motion, there is again a highly significant effect of Speed ( F (1.373) = 25.369 p = 0.002) and there is also a marginally significant effect of Separation, ( F (1.174) = 9.369, p = 0.029)–although it is the smallest separation that yields the highest thresholds.

We observed marginally significant changes for sperm motility (49 ± 3% vs. 38 ± 3%, p = 0.029) and a significant difference in follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) with lower level in young subjects (4.09 ± 0.29) compared with old subjects (6.25 ± 0.4, p = 3.66E−05).

A marginally significant correlation exists between this distance and the median difference in DVG abundance among scenarios ( ρ S = 0.794, 4 d.f., 1-tailed P = 0.029), suggesting that lineages evolved under more similar host switching histories tend to show more similar DVG abundances.

Rearing temperature had a marginally significant effect on foraging time—bumblebees reared at 27 °C tended to spend more time out of the hive on foraging trips ( P = 0.029, r 2 = 0.04; Supplementary Fig.

This hypothesis fits to our data as genetic diversity ( H e ) and the proportion of polymorphic loci (MAC ≥2) were slightly higher but significant or marginally significant in the southern group (0.803 vs. 0.798, Mann–Whitney U test, p = 0.029; 3821 vs. 3090, Mann–Whitney U test, p = 0.052).

While a marginally significant correlation was observed between the score and diseases status with genome-wide data (P T <0.3, AGP, P = 0.029; SSC, P = 0.0085), the score based on the neuronal modules was highly significant ( Figure 4 ).

Where PD primes featured non-prototypical animacy-semantic role mappings, there was a marginally significant effect of prime-target match, β = −2.33 ( SE = 1.07), z = −2.19, p = 0.029.

Significant and marginally significant differences were detected in DIO vs WTC ( P = .029) and DIO+R vs WTC+R ( P = .052).

In contrast, matched HLA-DPB1 had a marginally significant effect of protecting against TRM ( P = .029).

We found a marginally significant causal relationship from cg06809326 to WMH burden ( P = 2.91 × 10 −2 ).

Based on a binomial test, we observe a marginally significant overrepresentation of tandem duplications that capture gene sequences vs. solely non-coding sequences in D. yakuba ( P = 0.0291) and highly significant for D. simulans ( P = 9.044 × 10 −5 ).

The global test was marginally significant ( p = 0.0295), likely influenced by this variable.

This analysis revealed no significant contribution of PHYB (Figure S2A in File S3 ), and only a marginally significant interaction for the role of HDA6 at NOR genotypes Ler-Cvi and Ler-Ler – p-value = 0.0298 and p-value = 0.0125, respectively (Figure S2B in File S3 ).

The interaction effects, emotion × aggression, F (2.31, 117.69) = 1.83, p = 0.16, η p 2 = 0.04, and emotion × group, F (2.31, 117.69) = 0.33, p = 0.75, η p 2 = 0.007, were also nonsignificant Interestingly, a quadratic contrast for facial emotion was marginally significant, F (1, 51) = 4.76, p = 0.03, suggesting slightly more errors for anger and sadness than for happiness, but this trend did not survive the omnibus test.

The (transformed) DASS‐21 negative mood index was entered in the last step and explained 14% of additional variance, Δ F (1, 300) = 87.49, p < 0.001; DASS‐21 was significantly positively associated with IA symptoms, while Executive Dysfunction, age and gender—but not SR—remained significant, and Apathy now showed a weak, marginally significant ( p = 0.03) negative relationship to IAT scores as an apparent suppressor variable effect.

As seen in Figure 2A, 2D, and 2F , the effect of ultrasonic frequency was found to be marginally significant ( F = 5.74; p = 0.0300).