“marginally significant”

This pattern was significant in the statistical analysis; repeated measures analyses of variance (RANOVAs) revealed a main effect of proximity for RT [ F (4, 52) = 9.35, p < .001] and a marginally significant effect of proximity for error rate [ F (4, 52) = 2.37, p = . 064].

In addition, there was a marginally significant difference in the LDAEP among these genotype groups at Cz ( p = 0.064; Table 1 ).

After adjusting for sample size, we found that the eight most heavily parasitized species, or those with the highest relative tick abundance, accounted for over half (51.6%) of all ticks we collected ( Figure 3 ). Linear models revealed a significant effect of mass (F = 20.28, P < 0.0001, df = 1) and nesting site (F = 7.80, P = 0.0003, DF = 3) and a marginally significant effect of foraging category (ground versus tree, F = 3.61, P = 0.064, DF = 1) on tick prevalence ( Figure 4 ).

For the total fixation duration (TFD), a marginally significant interaction was found between emotion and group ( F (3, 522) = 2.479, p = 0.064, η 2 = 0.014).

Political identity had a marginally significant negative association with social prediction ( b = -0.09, SE = 0.05, t (258) = 1.86, p = .064).

The analysis for the PVD metric revealed a significant effect of AOI (Wilks’ Lambda = 0.75, F (2, 35) = 5.72, p = 0.007, η 2 p = 0.25) and a marginally significant Group × Condition interaction (Wilks’ Lambda = 0.86, F (2, 35) = 2.97, p = 0.064, η 2 p = 0.15).

Moreover, a marginally significant effects due to age was detected [ F (2, 32) = 2.996, p = 0.064].

However, Level 1 coefficients of the first income quartile had a marginally significant random effect across cohorts ( P = 0.064).

Lastly, the moderating effect of age on the association between maternal warmth and adolescents’ next-day self-esteem was marginally significant (b = -0.10, SE = 0.04, p = 0.064), while neither gender nor SES showed moderating effect ( p s > 0.465).

For salivary cortisol a marginally significant main effect of time was found [ F (3, 171) = 2.4579, p = 0.064; 4 participants were excluded from cortisol analysis due to insufficient saliva samples], according to post-hoc analysis, we found a marginally significant peak in cortisol level in the final sample (S4) as compared to post “rest 1” sample (S1, p = 0.057).

However, this path was marginally significant after controlling for demographic variables ( β = 0.109, p = 0 0.064) in the conditional model.

We also compared the task difficulty assessed by members using repeated measures ANOVA analysis, and the result showed that the difference between roles was marginally significant (F (2, 29) = 2.89, p = 0.064, η 2 partial = 0.09).

Besides a marginally significant interaction effect for TS at the calf (F = 2.988; p = 0.064), Bonferroni post hoc analysis of this interaction effect revealed an effect of time: reduced TS (i.e., less pain facilitation) after aerobic exercise compared to pre-exercise but only in the no medication condition (mean difference 0.938 (SE 0.397) p = 0.024).

The three‐way interaction between CI/NH, left/right and auditory/visual was marginally significant ( F (1,26) = 3.75, p = 0.064, η 2 = 0.003).

In the analysis of the “ everyday experience ” scores, we observed a marginally significant difference between the CP ( M = 4.41, SD = 0.668) and Ch ( M = 4.95, SD = 1.03; p = 0.064, d = 0.620) groups.

Only a marginally significant correlation was found between PDGFRA mRNA and lymph node metastasis ( p = 0.064). 2.2.

However, the redivision from 3 to 2 groups (H-IGF1 deco versus combined I-IGF1 deco and L-IGF1 deco ) demonstrated a marginally significant difference in the cumulative survival rates between the two groups ( p = 0.064; Supplementary Figure S5 ). 3.5.

In that way, corolla color had a marginally significant negative indirect effect on female fitness via number of flower (Estimate = −0.257, Z = −1.85, p = 0.064; Supplementary Table S2 ; Figure 2B ).

ANCOVA analysis showed significant group differences for spot reading ( F (1,55) = 8.58, P = 0.005), marginally significant group difference for fluent reading size ( F (1,45) = 3.61, P = 0.064), and critical print size ( F (1,56) = 3.78, P = 0.057).

The overall model was marginally significant ( F 2, 34 = 2.49, p = 0.064), as qualified by a unique association between intrusive re-experiencing and trauma memory ( sr = 0.39, p = 0.020) over and beyond all other PTSD symptom clusters ( p ’s > 0.182).

Indeed, age showed a marginally significant correlation with amygdala activation for the Valence contrast [ r (115) = 0.17, P = 0.064], with greater (Negative > Positive) amygdala activation in older adults.

Repeated measures ANOVA indicated a marginally significant time-by-plasma manipulation interaction, F (3, 108) = 2.93, ε = .617, P = .064, as observed in Figure 6 .

Additionally, the P2 amplitude was larger for negative-referential words in controls than in patients ( p = 0.003), while the difference was marginally significant for positive-referential words ( p = 0.064).

Kano and Kaduna Q6 MMR had significantly lower MMR (p = 0.0074 and p = 0.0001, respectively) and Katsina’s Q6 MMR was substantially lower (p = 0.0641, marginally significant) than their Q3 baselines.

The mean bundle implementation index score of the severe hypertension in pregnancy safety bundle for urban hospitals was higher compared to rural hospitals; however, the difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.0643).