“marginally significant”

On univariate analysis, the only significant prognostic factor for symptom control duration was BED ≥40 Gy 10 (p < 0.05), and CCRT was a marginally significant factor (p = 0.0644).

However, the interaction between concentration and varieties (*Conc.Var) is marginally significant ( p = 0.0645), indicating a potential combined influence (Annex 1).

The association between this SNP and nausea was marginally significant in the dominant model ( p = 0.0645), but no significant associations were found in the other analyses ( Table 5 ).

We found a marginally significant negative correlation between the number of different habitat types occupied by members of a clade and the mean complexity of those members (PGLS, p = 0.0645, F = 3.668 on 1 & 32 d.f., adj.R 2 = 0.0748, N = 34; Fig. 5e ).

In multivariate analysis, previous PCI was found to be marginally significant with p = 0.0648, however it was kept because the C-statistic of the final model decreased from 0.773 to 0.762, suggesting its importance.

In repeated measures mixed models, interactions between treatment and time was statistically significant for PASAT 3′′, SPART DR, SDMT and Stroop test and marginally significant for SPART 10/36 ( p = 0.0649) and SRT LTS ( p = 0.0556).

One of the ancestry components was marginally significant too in the non-smoker summary score (p=0.065).

The difference between the groups was marginally significant and the effect size was medium to large ( t (22) = −1.94, P = 0.065, d = 0.75).

Using general linear models that controlled for sex (Table 1 ), there were significant population-by-host interactions for both wing length ( P = 0.006) and wing area ( P = 0.009) as well as a marginally significant interaction for development time ( P = 0.065).

We observed a marginally significant main effect of prime face ( p = .065).

We further observe a marginally significant decrease in survival associated with STK11 splice site mutations for LUAD TCGA exome samples (p=6.5 × 10 −2 , Log-rank test) ( Figure 7E ).

According to the report of the IG teachers, the main statistically significant differences were a decrease in EBP between time 1 and 2 reported in the emotional problems ( p = 0.043) and hyperactivity ( p = 0.007) scales and in the total score with a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.065) (Table 4 ).

In terms of ACC, the main effect of priming emotion types was marginally significant, F(2,52) = 2.882, p = 0.065, η P 2 = 0.100.

Furthermore, a marginally significant time-by-group interaction was observed for physical performance, favoring the multicomponent approach (F(1, 19) = 3.83, p = 0.065, η 2 p = 0.168 [large effect]).

Similar patterns of context dependence were observed for the accumulation efficiency, with a marginally significant three-way interaction between MBOA peak area, induction, and red clover intercrop (β = 0.332 ± 0.178, t = 1.859, p = 0.065).

Univariate analysis indicates that TNM stage, adjuvant chemotherapy, Rab1B and MMP9 proteins are significant predictors for OS and PFS of CRC patients (All P < 0.05, Table 3 ), and Tumor depth is a marginally significant predictor for OS and PFS ( P =0.065 and P =0.059, respectively, Table 3 ).

In a similar pattern, the interaction effect of paternal care and overprotection predicted offspring hippocampal GMV that was marginally significant (Paternal care × Paternal overprotection, b = −0.07, SE = 0.04, p = 0.065, Δ R 2 = 0.006) (see Table 5 : Model 2).

A marginally significant inverse association was observed in males ( P = 0.065), and a significant inverse relationship was found in Non-Hispanic Black individuals ( P = 0.004).

However, in this fully adjusted model, the association between living alone and the number of occluding pairs became marginally significant ( P = 0.065).

The association for time-poverty-only was attenuated and became marginally significant (AME = +2.79pp, P = .065).

In contrast, self-leadership demonstrated significant variation according to educational level ( F (2, 343) = 5.125, p = 0.006; η 2 = 0.0290) with a small to medium effect size and marginally significant variation by position ( F (2, 343) = 2.762, p = 0.065; η 2 = 0.016) with a small effect size.

The number of correct markings to the six statements about symptoms of inadequate fluid intake showed a not significant time effect (F(2,288) = 1.480, p = 0.229, η 2 p = 0.01) and a marginally significant Time × Group interaction with a small effect (F(2,288) = 2.756, p = 0.065, η 2 p = 0.02).

Regarding DFS, only the administration of regimens involving CD-DST-selected drugs was found to be a prognostic factor (P=0.037), although EGFR status was demonstrated to be a marginally significant factor (P=0.065).

In Dianatkhah et al.’s study, the duration of mechanical ventilation and length of ICU stay were shorter in patients who received melatonin in comparison with the control group, but this difference was statistically not significant for the length of ICU stay and marginally significant for the duration of mechanical ventilation ( P = 0.065) [ 17 ].

Sleep disturbances also showed marginally significant differences in expected influence centrality ( p = 0.065, q < 0.10), suggesting that sleep disturbances may have had different net impacts on the overall network functioning between fathers and mothers.