“marginally significant”

Regarding rapid naming accuracy which had marginally significant improvement after the intervention ( p = .03), the trend of improvement in TPT ( p = .05) also seemed more apparent than that of CLR ( p = .18).

When we used these new estimates to compare levels of Neanderthal introgression for N-mt genes to background rates in the genome, the differences between N-mt genes and other nuclear genes were marginally significant at best ( P = 0.03 and 0.07 for European and Asian data sets, respectively; supplementary fig.

When these factors were included in the model, there was at best marginally significant evidence for associations with tubular growth pattern (HR = 0.51; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.93; P = 0.03) and tubule formation (HR = 1.64; 95% CI 0.97 to 2.78; P = 0.07).

[ 23 ], their cohort included adults and children with IgAN and a correlation between percent Gd-IgA1/IgA and contemporaneous UPCR was found to be marginally significant ( r = 0.25, P = 0.03).

We only detected a marginally significant correlation between the NAc ALFF and HAMD scores in the REST-meta-MDD cohort ( p = .03).

This trend was marginally significant across the basin when calculated using LMM (Figure 3 , Supporting Information Appendix S6.1 ); however, it was observed for 62 of 102 plots ( p = 0.03, two‐tailed binomial test) and persisted when our analyses were repeated across a larger data set (Supporting Information Appendix S6.2 ) and when grouping together nearby plots to account for spatial autocorrelation in the distribution of plots (Supporting Information Appendix S7.2 ).

There was a marginally significant improvement observed in children with IH in whom the treatment was started after 12 months of age (p = 0.03).

[ 16 ] noted a marginally significant ( P = 0.03) negative correlation between intron divergence and size for first introns (but not other introns) in the dataset of Halligan et al.

In women, the three polymorphisms showed a marginally significant association with fractures in the unadjusted analysis (rs1801132, p = 0.03; rs3020314, p = 0.04; rs1884051, p = 0.03), but it was no longer significant (p > 0.2) after including age as a covariate.

However there was a weak and marginally significant reverse correlation between 6MWT and prolactin level (r = -0.33 P = 0.03). 4.3.

Regarding the relationship between autonomic stress response and post-error behaviors, the partial correlation analysis controlling for education and personality traits revealed a marginally significant (using Bonferroni corrected significance level) positive correlation between the HR increase during treatment and PES in the stress group, r = .391, p = .03 ( Fig 3 , left), but no such correlation was found in the control group, r = .072, p = .76.

Ultimately, driven primarily by its significant advantage in reliability metrics, Bilibili also achieved a marginally significant victory in the DISCERN Total score (45.56 vs 42.56, P = .03).

Nonetheless, when only age was included as covariate, there was a marginally significant effect of MMR status ( P = .03).

However, for those who were ever smokers, we identified a marginally significant association between genetically predicted T2DM risk and lung cancer risk (OR = 0.92; 95%CI = 0.85–0.99; p = 0.03) although no significant association was observed in never smokers ( OR = 1.00; 95%CI = 0.93–1.07; p = 0.96; P heterogeneity = 0.13).

At maximum concentrations, significant and marginally significant effects on larval survival were seen with azoxystrobin ( p = 0.03) and trifloxystrobin ( p = 0.07).

Only the African sample showed marginally significant F ST higher than zero (0.08, p=0.03, not significant after Bonferroni correction), while other populations all had slightly negative estimates pointing to the limited role of the TYR locus in genetic differentiation within studied (sub-) continental groups ( Table S5 ) [ 74 ].

However, the Northern Territory population had significant or marginally significant p ‐values for SSD and raggedness values for both expansion models indicating poor support (spatial expansion: SSD p ‐value = .03, raggedness p ‐value = .05; demographic expansion: SSD p ‐value = .07, raggedness p ‐value = .03). 4.

In R2*, we found marginally significant main effects of Age ( β = 0.19, 95% CI = [0.02, 0.36], uncorrected- P = 0.03), and Sex ( β male = −0.41, 95% CI = [−0.76, −0.05], uncorrected- P = 0.025).

Among the naturally varying photographs, gender typicality again significantly predicted women’s perceived sexual orientation, β = .92, z = 34.13, p < .001, but, in contrast with the neutral photographs, so did emotion (a marginally significant result in Study 2), β = .05, z = 2.13, p = .03.

Note, however, that even for these relatively uninformative studies the evidence favors \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$\mathcal {H}_{0}$\end{document} H 0 , whereas the respective classical p values equal p = .06 (i.e., “marginally significant”), p = .03 (i.e., “significant, reject \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$\mathcal {H}_{0}$\end{document} H 0 ”), and p = .06 (i.e., “marginally significant”). 3 Finally, consider the evidence for the studies in which the effect is in the opposite direction and most of the posterior mass is concentrated on negative values of ρ .

As extreme phenotype samples have been shown to increase power in genetic association studies [ 52 , 53 ], when emmetropic individuals were included in the control group, the association of rs634990 with myopia became smaller and marginally significant (heterozygous carriers: OR = 1.36 [1.03, 1.78], p = 0.03; homozygous carriers: OR = 1.48 [1.07, 2.04], p = 0.02).

This was marginally significant ( p = 0.03; binary logistic regression with gender as the factor).

This success rate was mainly influenced by the shoal size (p<0.0001) rather than by the number of residence events (p>0.05) that has only a marginally significant effect when coupled with the shoal size (p = 0.03) as shown by the model Succes ∼ shoal size + CRE + shoal size * CRE (Null deviance = 2152.38 with 51 df, Residual deviance = 261.22 with 48 df).

Interestingly, rs2471083 alleles, regardless of their parental origin, show marginally significant association (P = 0.03) with KCNK9 expression levels in the hippocampus ( http://www.broadinstitute.org/gtex/ ).

The approximately 40-kDa procathepsin B exhibited a marginally significant increase of 93±27% (mean±SEM; P<0.03) in the PADK-treated group as compared to vehicle-injected transgenic mice samples ( Fig. 4A and B ).