“marginally significant”

An individual level cross-sectional analysis conducted in India indicated that there is a marginally significant positive relationship between arsenic intake from rice and the changes of LDL ( p -value = 0.032) [ 34 ], which complies with the results in our study.

Additionally, a marginally significant difference was found in the 13–18 years group at the 4-item level ( p = 0.032), with boys having slightly higher BMI.

In contrast, the model predicting symptom knowledge was not statistically significant (R 2 = 0.026, p = 0.164), although age group showed a marginally significant effect (B = 0.534, p = 0.032).

Within other categories, only alcohol consumers demonstrated a marginally significant relationship (OR = 1.028, 95% CI: 1.002–1.054, P = 0.032).

Correlation between geographic distance and genetic differentiation was marginally insignificant for F ST (r = 0.302, P = 0.063) and marginally significant for R ST (r = 0.422, P = 0.032).

Carbohydrate treatment had a marginally significant effect on the duration of pupal development (F 3,20 = 3.5694, P = 0.032; Fig. 2c ).

Comparing absolute antibody concentrations, we found a marginally significant higher concentration of antibodies in the NS cases than in the community controls (0.078 versus 0.059 AU/mL, respectively, p = 0.032, Mann–Whitney U test), yet no difference was found between the NS cases and the household controls (0.078 versus 0.070 AU/mL, respectively, p = 0.260, Mann–Whitney U test).

However, because our statistical tests show only a marginally significant change from 1950 to 1960 ( P = 0.032) and this cohort is missing in the linked contemporary census and survey data, we consider the deviation of the 1950 birth cohort best interpreted as suggestive.

However, there were marginally significant differences between stage I-II and IV (OS; p = 0.0328, PFS; p = 0.0273) (Figure 3 ) and between aa-IPI 1-3 and 4 (OS; p = 0.004, PFS; p = 0.0238) (Figure 4 ), These survival differences were not significant in multivariate analysis (data not shown).

The feature X race and age X feature effects were significant or marginally significant, respectively, F (1,70) = 3.57, p = .033, η ṗ 2 = .09, and F (2,70) = 3.12, p = .050, η ṗ 2 = .08.

Nepal) with anger outcomes was marginally significant ( β = 0.1841, p = 0.033).

The difference in lesion detection rates between the standard group and the RPP group with 50-keV imaging was marginally significant for the portal venous phase (FOM: 0.574 vs. 0.735, P = 0.033).

Overall quality of life, the main study outcome measure, showed a decline between baseline ( M = 5.29, SD = 1.29) and M3 ( M = 5.14, SD = 1.32) ( t (583) = 3.71; p < 0.001) and then increased back to levels comparable to those at baseline (M6: M = 5.48, SD = 1.16; M9: M = 5.48, SD = 1.19; M12: M = 5.52, SD = 1.23), with all changes relative to M3 being significant at p < 0.001 and changes from M0 being non-significant ( p = 0.14 and p = 0.17 for M6 and M9, respectively) or marginally significant ( p = 0.033 for M12).

The TRIPLET × PART × AGE GROUP was marginally significant [ F (4, 278) = 2.377, η 2 p = 0.033, p = 0.052].

When we controlled for phylogeny, we also found marginally significant correlations between four traits (SLA, π 0 , π tlp , and ε) and the 5th percentile of AI (SLA: F =4.93, P =0.033, Figure 6E ; π0: F=3.53, P =0.069, Figure 7E ; π tlp : F =3.31, P =0.078, Figure 7F ; and ε: F =3.24, P =0.08, Figure 7G ).

A marginally significant time-dependent effect was observed for LDL-C ( p = 0.033 and p = 0.032, respectively); however, given the non-significant global test and the absence of meaningful effect modification, this single covariate deviation at the conventional threshold is unlikely to materially influence the robustness of our primary conclusions ( Supplementary Table S11 ).

Among older African Americans, however, the association between having none or one vs two or more recent stressors strengthened over time (and marginally significant in 2012) to become more protective for SRH declines (time*stress, p = 0.033).

In sensitivity analysis 10, we observed only a marginally significant association between ACE inhibitors and gastric cancer (HR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.02–1.59, p = 0.033), which remained consistent (HR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.02–1.59, p = 0.033) after adjusting for baseline Helicobacter pylori infection status among participants.

The causal effect on CRP was −0.022 ( P = .038), while the effect on IL-10 was positive but marginally significant at 0.086 ( P = .033).

However, when singletons were excluded from the analysis, results show marginally significant differences in assemblages between the western and opportunistic study areas (ANOSIM: Global R = 0.091, p = 0.033) ( Fig 4a ).

We observed no significant differences between online and in-lab data across two of the three conditions (Harmonic, Random Phase, Z=1.77, p=.076, Pure Tone, Z=1.86, p=.063, using two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum tests), and a marginally significant difference in one condition (Harmonic, Sine Phase, Z=2.14, p=.033).

However, among the subscales we only found marginally significant difference on the Glucose management subscale (median (interquartile range): 7.33 (6.00–8.79) vs 7.30 (5.83–8.48), effect size: 0,098, p = 0.033).

However, the strong correlations of both, AcG and UnG with ISI were abolished after adjustment for BMI, whereas the association of the AcG/UnG ratio with ISI was marginally significant ( p = 0.033).

Over the past 12 months, 9.2% (147/1603) had experienced sexual violence, with a marginally significant difference between men and women (6.4% vs. 10.0%, p = 0.033).

A marginally significant difference in influenza knowledge was also observed between medical staff (76.56% vs 59.77%, OR = 1.90, 95%CI: 1.05–3.45, P = .033) ( Table 3 ).