“marginally significant”

However, that difference was marginally significant (t-test p value = 0.033, but Mann-Whitney p value was 0.44, Fig. 4A ).

The feature X race and age X feature effects were significant or marginally significant, respectively, F (1,70) = 3.57, p = .033, η ṗ 2 = .09, and F (2,70) = 3.12, p = .050, η ṗ 2 = .08.

The functional connectivity between the parietal-ROI and the frontal-ROI showed a marginally significant difference between hemispheres [ t (24) = 2.26, p = 0.033], but it did not survive Bonferroni correction ( p < 0.05/2).

When we controlled for phylogeny, we also found marginally significant correlations between four traits (SLA, π 0 , π tlp , and ε) and the 5th percentile of AI (SLA: F =4.93, P =0.033, Figure 6E ; π0: F=3.53, P =0.069, Figure 7E ; π tlp : F =3.31, P =0.078, Figure 7F ; and ε: F =3.24, P =0.08, Figure 7G ).

A marginally significant time-dependent effect was observed for LDL-C ( p = 0.033 and p = 0.032, respectively); however, given the non-significant global test and the absence of meaningful effect modification, this single covariate deviation at the conventional threshold is unlikely to materially influence the robustness of our primary conclusions ( Supplementary Table S11 ).

Nepal) with anger outcomes was marginally significant ( β = 0.1841, p = 0.033).

The meta-analysis of eligible studies, including 1154 PD patients and 994 controls, showed a non-significant increase in serum/plasma manganese in PD patients, which was marginally significant in the common effects model ( p = 0.0333) ( Figure 7 b). 3.4.4.

When predicting Action Judgment Error, there was a marginally significant effect of experimental condition (η 2 p = .034, 90% CI [0.00, 0.07], F (3, 195) = 2.27, p = .082).

This showed that, for the first saccade, there was no significant difference between the time points (Wald Chi 2 (2) = 2.089; p = 0.352), but a marginally significant effect of the condition (Wald Chi 2 (1) = 3.327, p = 0.034 one-sided) with better performance in FB1 than in FB2 (see Fig. 4 ).

In addition, the PIT of transect 1 had a marginally significant reduction pattern (estimate ± SE = −0.050 ± 0.023, t = −2.151, p = .034; Table 3 and Figure 4g ). 3.4 Sexual dimorphism in brain size For males, the average relative proportions of TEL and PIT were 0.503 and 0.026, while for females, they were 0.497 and 0.03.

A marginally significant increase in epinephrine (+3.21 μg/gCr, P = 0.034 ) and a statistically significant increase in glutamate (+20.70 μMol/gCr, P = 0.005 ) post‐GCE dose are consistent with evidence that certain doses of caffeine can augment the release of excitatory neurotransmitters. 23 A similar increase in epinephrine was observed postcontrol dose but not post‐GLE dose.

Their expression differences between HPV-P and HPV-negative women were significant or marginally significant, respectively ( p = 0.034 for RFC4 and p = 0.08 for TOP2A, Fig. 4 D).

There was a marginally significant 8.1% reduction in CVD risk with a 10% increase in F 2 IP ( P =0.034) without adjustment for HbA1c that became nonsignificant after such adjustment ( P =0.057).

Interestingly, plant species richness remained significant or marginally significant even when fitted after plant functional groups richness in affecting microbial biomass in 2006 ( F 1,70 = 4.67; P = 0.034), Collembola density in 2004 ( F 1,66 = 8.53; P = 0.005), Oribatida density in 2008 ( F 1,66 = 4.95; P = 0.030), macrofauna herbivore density in 2008 ( F 1,71 = 3.34; P = 0.072), macrofauna herbivore diversity in 2004 ( F 1,71 = 3.90; P = 0.051) and 2008 ( F 1,71 = 6.87; P = 0.011), and macrofauna decomposer diversity in 2008 ( F 1,71 = 7.03; P = 0.010).

Age was considered as control variable and entered as covariate because significant and marginally significant correlations were observed with mean N2 ( r = .19, p = .034) and P3 ( r = −.15, p = .09) amplitudes.

Full‐spectrum speech An LME model with RAU‐transformed scores as the independent variable; age at test, group (cNH or cCI), and speaker (male or female) as fixed effects; and subject‐based random intercepts showed significant effects of age ( p = .0003), group ( p < .0001), and speaker ( p = .0003), and a marginally significant interaction between age and group ( p = .0340) on mean emotion recognition cores (Figure 3 ).

At the same time, when we carried out our comparisons across species, we found only a marginally significant correlation between the minimal AAI of a species and its maximal gene fluidity ( P = 0.034, according to the Spearman Rank correlation test; table 1 ).

A contingency chi2 revealed a marginally significant enrichment (12.8% expected versus 33% observed, p = 0.034).

There was a marginally significant increase (p = 0.034) in CD8 T effector memory cells re-expressing CD45RA (T EMRA ) in PBMC of LTBI vs RSTR participants.

Race showed marginally significant differences for Tinfl ( p = 0.034, two-sided Student’s t -test) and Angio ( p = 0.069) expression with medium effect size [ 41 , 42 ] (Cohen’s d = 0.50 for both signatures).

Specifically, after Holm–Bonferroni correction, there was only a marginally significant positive correlation between trial 2 and trial 3 JOL gamma scores, r (36) = 0.34, p = 0.034, and a significant positive correlation between trial 2 and trial 3 RCJ gamma scores, r (36) = 0.47, p = 0.003 (others: p s from −0.003 to 0.23, p s > 0.17).

Matched samples comparisons There were marginally significant differences in RSFC parameters (Table 2 ) for within-network RSFC of the fronto-parietal network (FPN, p = 0.034) and the ratio of within- to inter-network RSFC of the visual network ( p = 0.044; Fig. 2 ) between PRESENT shift workers and MATCHED controls.

In addition, there is a modestly significant interaction between genotype and sex ( P = 0.034), and a marginally significant interaction between stage and genotype ( P = 0.07).

As such we saw a treatment effect of 3.76 marginally significant ( p = 0.0341), which is considerably smaller than the 16-point difference we initially thought to be clinically meaningful.

Sulcatol had a marginally significant attractive effect on H. hampei females (χ 2 1 = 4.4545 P = 0.0348; N = 44) ( Fig. 4 ).