“marginally significant”

Pairwise comparisons of native versus non-native stimuli for each combination of Feature, Group, and Time showed only one marginally significant effect: for Mandarin speakers, phoneme features in the late interval exhibited earlier peak times for native language stimuli ( t (324) = –1.83, p = 0.068).

We found, however, a significant and negative correlation between mean productivity in the whole population-year and the SEA c ( r s = −0.86, P = 0.014), and a marginally significant negative correlation between mean productivity and the SDNND b ( r s = −0.72, P = 0.068), suggesting that those population-years with more heterogeneous territories in terms of diet were less productive than population-years with territories showing more homogeneous prey consumption patterns ( Figure 5 ).

After controlling for age and gender, the Christian × Non-4R/4R interaction remains marginally significant (coeff. = −0.036, p = 0.068).

7A ), driven by significant indirect effect mediated through reducing burden ( P = 0.024) and marginally significant direct effect ( P = 0.068).

The main effect of GCS was marginally significant (∆ R 2 = .01, β = –.12, Z = –1.83, p = .068), suggesting that participants with higher GCS watched fewer videos than those with lower GCS.

The flgH mutation (large morphotype from monoculture #4) also had reduced biofilm formation, but the difference was marginally significant ( t test, P = 0.068) ( Fig. 5 ).

Finally, in Experiment 4, there was a marginally significant increase ( F (1, 26) = 3.612, p = .068, η p 2 = .122) in reaction time in the blindfolded condition ( M = 0.6181, SE = .016) compared to the 60° FOV condition ( M = 0.5973, SE = .014).

Results A marginally significant difference in the physiological cost index when using the two support products, where it tends to be lower with the use of AK (Z = -1,82; p = 0,068).

Looking at the Condition * Religiosity interactions, we observed a marginally significant interaction in the USA sample (Religiosity * Secular: p = 0.068; Religiosity * Control: p = 0.052), but this interaction did not replicate in the other sites (ps > 0.3; Table 4 , Models B).

In contrast, we found a marginally significant ( p = 0.0681) decrease in ragweed biomass due to earthworm activity, suggesting that ragweed did not benefit from the earthworm-induced improvements in nutrients and soil structure, or that earthworms might have fed on roots as because they were foraging less on the surface [ 46 ] Our results show that the positive influence of earthworms on plant growth and soil properties can be reduced by light pollution.

When models included attitudes toward this specific BMP and run on the subset of respondents that reported being familiar with it, education and overall water knowledge ceased to be related to the implementation of downspout disconnections and only attitudes toward the BMP emerged as being marginally significant (χ 2 2 = 3.32, p = 0.0682), with a trend indicating that more favorable attitudes promoted greater implementation ( Fig 8 ).

Similar to the previous models, responses to communicative turns immediately before the INT were predictive of Productive [M3: adj R 2 = 0.107, F(1, 28) = 4.457, p = 0.044] and marginally significant of Receptive vocabulary development at 24 months post INT [M4: adj R 2 = 0.092, F(1, 25) = 3.627, p = 0.0683], but not at 36 months post INT ( Figures 2A,B ).

Compared to Ruxo 30 alone, the increased survival in mice treated with a combination of Ruxo 30 and Taxol 10 was marginally significant (p = 0.0684), but was significant when compared to Taxol 10 treatment alone (p = 0.0158) and Ruxo 75 in combination with Taxol (p = 0.0204, Figure 5E ).

In the Kaplan–Meier survival curves for cumulative AD mortality, higher levels of blood cadmium showed marginally significant association with increased mortality at baseline and in patients over 60 years of age ( p = 0.0684).

Kaplan–Meier analysis showed a marginally significant difference between surgery and non-surgery groups for overall mortality (Log-rank p = 0.0685, Fig. 2 d) and cancer-specific mortality (Log-rank p = 0.0638, Fig. 2 b).

However, the correlation between the arousal rating for each picture and the 50% threshold for the detection of desaturation inferred from Probit analysis was marginally significant [ r = −.466, t (14) = −1.97, p = .0687], whereas the correlation inferred between the valence rating for each picture and 50% threshold was not significant [ r = .09, t (14) = 0.34, p = .7414].

37% in the PAZ only group, a marginally significant difference ( P = 0.069).

In the fourth quarter, advice giving produced a marginally significant increase in math grades ( B = 0.93, SE = 0.51, 95% CI = −0.07 to 1.94, n = 1,758, t [1,739] = 1.82, P = 0.069, d = 0.09) and a nonsignificant increase in target grades ( B = 0.70, SE = 0.53, 95% CI = −0.34 to 1.75, n = 1,691, t [1,672] = 1.32, P = 0.187, d = 0.06).

The analysis of first pass with no regression times revealed a marginally significant interaction between the two factors (β = 31.95, SE = 17.52, t = 1.82, p = 0.069).

Increases in soil temperature of 0.4 °C were also recorded in chambers during autumn (SON; T value 3.47, p = 0.018), but OTCs only had a marginally significant effect on soil temperature in winter (DJF; p = 0.069, T value = −2.78; Figure 2 b).

Change from 2020 to 2021 There was a marginally significant increase in average number of daily virtual interaction partners between 2020 and 2021 (Table S2 ), t (418.63) = 1.83, p = 0.069, and a significant increase in number of weekly virtual interaction partners from 2020 to 2021, t (397.51) = 2.32, p = 0.021.

Interestingly, further analysis revealed that British participants perceived their past selves as being further away than their future selves at a marginally significant level, F (1, 80) = 3.41, p = 0.069, Cohen’s d = 0.407.

For female respondents, the mediating effect of family support on sleep quality with respect to FOC was significant (B = 0.045, p = 0.001, 95% CI [0.023, 0.077]); for male respondents as well, this mediating effect was marginally significant (B = 0.013, p = 0.069, 95% CI [0.002, 0.032]).

The difference between high and low-risk groups ( M = 3.44, SD = 2.40) was marginally significant ( p = 0.069).

When the data were corrected for multiple comparisons with Holm method, the elderly male ( p = 0.024) and elderly female ( p = 0.046) groups showed significant correlations, while the young male group showed a marginally significant correlation ( p = 0.069).