It was found that PDOF ( p = 0.001) had a significant negative effect, impact velocity ( p = 0.055) had a marginally significant positive effect, and impact height ( p = 0.068) had a marginally significant negative effect on FE model predicted maximum principal strain.
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
Additionally, a marginally significant relationship ( t = 1.946, p = 0.068) was observed between decreased progesterone levels from LFP to PMP and FWHM reductions in the left STG in the MRM group (Figure 3D ).
Conversely, in the L1–L3 context, a marginally significant opposite pattern emerged ( b = −0.119, t = −1.86, p = 0.068, R 2 = 0.04), where enhanced inhibitory control was associated with faster “no” response rates.
Although marginally significant ( p = 0.068), parents in the COVID-19-affected group reported lower scores in the “treatment adherence II” domain compared with parents unaffected by COVID-19 (82.08 ± 20.08 vs. 85.38 ± 17.48, p = 0.068). 4.
The frequency of CD82 + CD4 + T cells increased after MWA with a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.068).
Pairwise comparisons of native versus non-native stimuli for each combination of Feature, Group, and Time showed only one marginally significant effect: for Mandarin speakers, phoneme features in the late interval exhibited earlier peak times for native language stimuli ( t (324) = –1.83, p = 0.068).
Post hoc comparisons revealed that first-fixation duration in the physical cueing condition was significantly shorter than that in the verbal cueing condition ( p = 0.031); the difference between the physical cueing and no cueing conditions was marginally significant ( p = 0.068), with the first-fixation duration in the no cueing condition potentially being longer than that in the physical cueing condition.
The interaction effect of the fairness category and stake size was marginally significant [ F (1, 27) = 3.61, p = 0.068, partial η 2 = 0.118].
When the SSPI was entered in Block 1 and SSPC was entered in Block 2 of a hierarchical logistic regression analysis, there was significant effect in Block 1 ( χ 2 (1) = 7.97, p = 0.005), explaining 8.2% of the variance (Nagelkerke), but only a marginally significant effect for Block 2 ( χ 2 (1) = 3.32, p = 0.068) explaining 11.5% of the variance (Nagelkerke).
In contrast, there was no statistically significant difference in any quartile category compared to the lowest intake of ω-3 fatty acids, although p for trend was marginally significant (p = 0.068).
The Wilcoxon test showed a marginally significant difference in AP before and after AR ( Table 5 ), Z = −1.83, p = 0.068, while there was no difference in SM or SE before and after AR, p > 0.05.
4 A) of benthic macroinvertebrates, while the differences in δ 13 C values among species were marginally significant (p = 0.068, Kruskal–Wallis test, n = 60, Fig. 4 B).
The variable Daily using is non-significant in the GDP model ( β = 0.2102, p = 0.153) but becomes much stronger and marginally significant in the GNI model ( β = 0.4144, p = 0.068).
Moreover, there was a marginally significant total effect between materialism and conflict, β = .10, p = .068, 95% CI [−.01, .20], and a significant mediation effect, β = .03, p = .017, 95% CI [.01, .06].
Conversely, the ADE of sleep on Aβ42 was negative ( β = −15.88) and marginally significant ( p = 0.068).
Among the ≥ high-risk patients, those who did not receive ADT ( n = 8) showed a marginally significant negative correlation ( r = −0.672, p = 0.068), whereas no meaningful correlation was observed in those who received ADT ( n = 6, r = 0.107, p = 0.840).
Statistically significant association was found for failure to identify coffee (ERR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.18–1.36, p = 0.010) and marginally significant associations were found for failure to identify cinnamon (ERR = 0.33, 95% CI: −0.02–0.68, p = 0.068) and rose (ERR = 0.33, 95% CI: −0.01–0.67, p = 0.054) with death.
A similar marginally significant two-way interaction emerged when comparing the control video with the porn baseline , B = 74.60, t (23427) = 1.824, p = 0.068, 95% CI: −5.569, 154.772.
A sensitivity analysis found that it had a marginally significant effect at 1‐month (T2, P = .068) and a significant effect at 3‐month (T3, P = .035) follow‐up.
We found, however, a significant and negative correlation between mean productivity in the whole population-year and the SEA c ( r s = −0.86, P = 0.014), and a marginally significant negative correlation between mean productivity and the SDNND b ( r s = −0.72, P = 0.068), suggesting that those population-years with more heterogeneous territories in terms of diet were less productive than population-years with territories showing more homogeneous prey consumption patterns ( Figure 5 ).
Accurate responses were significantly faster for good images than bad images (892 ms and 1028 ms respectively; t(8) = 8.82, p <0.001), and this effect was significant across all the categories (t(8) = 8.53, p <0.001 for beaches; t(8) = 6.27, p <0.001 for forests; t(8) = 4.42, p <0.01 for highways; t(8) = 5.2, p <0.001 for mountains and t(8) = 2.58, p <0.05 for offices) except for city streets in which the difference was marginally significant (t(8) = 2.10, p = 0.068).
A slight interaction between light color and illuminance was seen, with the green light at 20 lx condition exhibiting a marginally significant negative impact on valence scores (β = −0.542, p = 0.068).
Moreover, differences in richness of typical grassland species among treatment were recorded, even if marginally significant (F = 5.69, p = 0.068).
In line with this thought, we also performed a McDonald-Kreitman test (MK test) for the genes and found that both genes are marginally significant or insignificant ( tweedledee p = 0.068; tweedledum p = 0.048), despite that these are small genes and have low Pn values.
Technophobia also had a marginally significant effect on fatigue, F (1, 73) = 3.440, p = 0.068, η 2 = 0.045.