“marginally significant”

A statistically significant positive association was observed in Italy (B=0.03, 95% CI 0.02-0.05; P <.001) and a marginally significant association in Germany (B=0.02, 95% CI 0.00-0.04; P =.07), whereas the association was negligible in the remaining countries.

NF‐C showed a marginally significant increase from 0 to 6 months ( P = .07) while changes from 0 to 3 months and 3 to 6 months were not significant.

Serum albumin was a marginally significant negative predictive factor of SRE (HR = 0.59; p = 0.070) by multivariate analysis.

These significant and marginally significant biomarkers were introduced together as interaction terms into multivariable analysis, and the results exhibited that only the WHO grade (+19.1 ± 10.5, p = 0.07) showed marginal independence ( Table 3 ).

The gender difference in the estimated bodyweight change between 2018 and 2020 was marginally significant (p=0.07).

Moreover, the effect of the self-efficacy messages was marginally significant ( P = .07) for positive attitudes toward checking their skin, with women reporting more positive attitudes toward checking their skin than men on a scale of 1–5 (mean = 4.2, 95% CI = 4.1–4.3 vs 4.0, 95% CI = 3.9–4.1; P = .004, η p 2 = 0.02).

This increase was marginally significant at the posttest, β = 0.51, p = 0.07, and significant at the 3-month follow-up, β = 0.88, p = 0.007.

amazonensis infective juveniles displayed a marginally significant (P = 0.07, Dunnett’s Test) preference for undamaged corn seedlings versus blank controls.

The load × group interaction effect was marginally significant [ F (2,92) = 2.65, p = 0.07, η 2 = 0.06].

Marginally significant higher level in smokers was found in the first Model 1 ( p = 0.07) but the level in EC users and duals was not significantly different compared to non-smokers.

We found that white women had a marginally significant increased risk of liver disease progression compared with black and Hispanic women ( P = .07); however, there was no significant difference in liver disease progression for white men compared with non-white men.

Taxonomic diversity in the vegetated soils was weakly, but consistently, higher compared to bulk soil, and differences in Simpson indices were marginally significant (Mann–Whitney test, P = 0.07, Supplementary Table S1 ).

In addition, the Go-N2 amplitude showed a marginally significant effect of the Group factor (F (2, 49) = 2.7; p = 0.07), as the amplitude was larger in the Control group than in the sdaMCI group.

MVV Over all subjects, correlations revealed significant associations between MVV and the reported likelihood of having fallen asleep (r =.37, p < .001), MVV, and ESS (r = −.14, p =.05), and marginally significant associations between MVV and KSS pre (r = −.13, p =.07).

There was a marginally significant effect of the prevention focus on the level of goal [ F (1,111) = 3.5 , p = 0.07] such that high-prevention respondents were setting directionally lower goal levels compared to the low-prevention respondents.

There was a significant interaction between time × quality of memory ( F (2,653) = 14.324, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.021) and a marginally significant interaction between quality of memory × genotype ( F (1,653) = 2.673, p = 0.070, η 2 = 0.008).

However, the squared term for employer event communication demonstrated a marginally significant and positive relationship with salesperson resilience (B = 0.19, p = .07), which indicates a weak curvilinear relationship between employer event communication and salesperson resilience.

Consistent with these findings dsAaMC1-injected mosquitoes had a significantly higher median number of oocysts when infected with Plasmodium gallinaceum ( P <0.007, Mann-Whitney Test)( Figure S2 ); the difference in the oocyst distributions was marginally significant ( P <0.07, KS Test) and the prevalence of infection increased significantly from 63% to 80% ( P <0.008, Chi-square Test).

The interaction of both factors showed a marginally significant effect, F (1, 48)=3.434, p =0.07.

Results showed that the effect of experimental manipulation remained marginally significant, F (1,75) = 3.39, p = 0.070, η 2 = 0.04.

The difference in RTs between the VR-Lab and the Desktop-Lab conditions was marginally significant ( P =.07).

The difference between these correlations is marginally significant [ t (17) = 1.94, p = 0.07], based on Williams’s test (i.e., Steiger’s preferred method).

Compared with the WT group, a marginally significant difference was detected in TRT (235 ± 6 μm) ( N = 11) in the 5XFAD group ( p = 0.07).

Additionally, there was a marginally significant difference between mild personality impairment and moderate personality impairment groups in DT ( p = 0.07).

The main effect of emotion was marginally significant ( F (1,23) = 3.59, p = 0.07, d = 0.14); participants were more accurate in classifying peripheral objects as either repeated or manipulated if they had been previously paired with a neutral central picture rather than a negative central picture.