“marginally significant”

The main effect of direction consistency was marginally significant ( M = 18.3 ms), F (1, 13) = 4.0, p = 0.07.

Likewise, adding relative risk to a model with only absolute risk improved fit significantly (p<.001), whereas adding absolute risk to a model including relative risk was associated with only a marginally significant improvement in fit (p=.07).

The greatest disparity was observed in Whisper ( β = 11.0, 95% CI [1.0, 21.0], p = 0.031), while WhisperX showed a smaller, marginally significant difference ( β = 3.4, p = 0.07).

A repeated measures Two-Way analysis of variances (ANOVA) with task and switch as factors revealed significant main effect of the task [ F (1, 13) = 194.3, P < 0.001], and task switch [ F (1, 13) = 28.1, P < 0.001], with a marginally significant interaction effect [ F (1, 13) = 3.64, P = 0.07].

Those high on group level self-investment showed marginally significant favoritism toward the in-group, b = −0.01, SE = 0.01, Wald χ 2 = 3.30, P = 0.07, whereas those low on group-level self-investment showed favoritism toward the out-group, b = 0.02, SE = 0.01, Wald χ 2 = 4.82, P = 0.03.

2022 ) suggested that higher PLAG1 expression in blood had a marginally significant association with longer overall survival ( P = 0.07) ( Fig. 6 H), while higher SMAD1 expression had a marginally significant association with shorter overall survival ( P = 0.096) ( Fig. 6 H).

For RT to choose high-probability stimuli, there was a marginally significant effect of trial type ( F (1,35)=3.53, P = 0.07, partial η 2 =0.09), with faster responses on reward trials relative to punishment trials.

There was also a 3.3% marginally significant decrease in diastolic blood pressure with a 2 day lag (95% CI = −6.6, 0.2; p = 0.07).

During periods 3–5, when the children in the LNS groups received the supplement directly, food-insecurity scores were significantly lower in the LNS group when the children were 11–12.9 mo old (PSR: 0.96, P = 0.03) and marginally significant when they were 16–18.9 mo old ( P = 0.07) and ≥23 mo old ( P = 0.08).

The difference between the MMN for the GP and PP groups was marginally significant at the central location (t(13) = 1.87, p = 0.07, GP = -0.82μV, PP = -0.13μV), and not significant at the supratemporal location.

faecium , there was a marginally significant difference, with males being more resistant ( F = 3.36, d.f. = 1, 83, P = 0.070).

Light threshold results demonstrate a marginally significant positive moderate correlation between percentage of points above 16.3 lux and SMR 35-74 /km 2 (r = .48, P < .07; R 2 = .23).

In model 2, while not statistically significant, it showed a marginally significant association ( p = 0.07).

For short-delay recall (A6), the main effect was nonsignificant ( F (1, 34) = 0.01, p = .945, η 2 = .000), but a marginally significant interaction emerged ( F (1, 34) = 3.51, p = .070, η 2 = .094), suggesting a potential medium effect and differential group development.

We nevertheless observed a marginally significant correlation between days to flowering and silique number within the experimental populations of planting 3 (Spearman r = 0.29, p = 0.07).

Beyond classification of PDAC vs controls, our analysis also exposed a marginally significant elevation in the PDAC score in patients with lymph node metastasis in patients with PDAC ( P = .07) ( Figure 1 F ).

NF was a marginally significant predictor for concrete concepts ( p = 0.07), but not for abstract concepts ( p = 0.28).

One-sample t-tests against the chance level of 0% showed significant effects of stimulation relative to sham for LpIFG ( t (12) = 2.35, p = 0.037) and a marginally significant effect for RpSTG ( t (12) = 1.99, p = 0.07).

The original predicted interaction between threat of diagnosis and Internet use remained marginally significant ( B =.17, SE=0.09, P =.07).

There was also a marginally significant interaction between Group and Sex, F (4, 699) = 2.11, p = 0.07.

Interestingly, participants’ ability to distinguish high-quality health resources showed a significant negative correlation with ease of finding information (ρ=−0.251, 95% CI −0.46 to −0.02; P =.04), whereas the correlation with information organization perception was marginally significant (ρ=−0.215, 95% CI −0.42 to 0.01; P =.07).

PC2 scores from pPCA are associated with mean annual temperature (partial r 2 = 0.33, P = 0.04), while PC2 scores from regular PCA show a marginally significant relationship (partial r 2 = 0.29, P = 0.07).

In addition, the interaction between prime and group is marginally significant, F (1, 81) = 2.62, p = 0.07, η 2 = 0.06.

HL, on the other hand, showed only a marginally significant effect on attitudes ( p = 0.070).

Moreover, income inequality remained a marginally significant predictor of the criterion variable, B = 0.011, SE = 0.008, p = .07, when controlling for the proportion of ethnic minorities in a country, which was not predictive of fear of crime, B = 0.002, SE = 0.008, p = .41.