Among those with early sleep timing, only short sleep duration showed a marginally significant association with SI, with an OR of 2.79 (0.90–8.67; p = 0.07; Table 4 ).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
Heterogeneity was marginally significant among stages ( P = 0.07).
As illustrated in Table 4 , the low self-control group scored significantly higher than the high self-control group on PMPUS ( t = 7.71, p < 0.001) as well as use patterns of interpersonal ( t = 2.73, p < 0.01), entertainment ( t = 2.65, p < 0.01) and transaction ( t = 2.56, p < 0.05), whereas marginally significant less on information seeking pattern ( t =−1.78, p = 0.07).
All of the remaining single sample showed a marginally significant editing level when compared to the 12 honeybee workers (1 versus 12 comparison, P = 0.07).
Although none of the additive effects were statistically significant (all p > 0.16); we observed a marginally significant interaction between GSTP1 Ile105Val (rs1695) and ASD status ( p = 0.07); even after controlling for parental education level and consumption of avocado; root vegetables; and tuna (canned fish).
approached significancep = 0.070
The difference between rsbA and ureC approached significance ( p = 0.070), while mrpA and ureC showed a marginally significant trend ( p = 0.098).
The difference between studies on rTMS familiarity was marginally significant ( p = 0.07, Cohen’s d = 0.25), suggesting that amount of information about rTMS may increase perceived familiarity with it, though the effect size was small.
Results The results of analysis of covariance with repeated measures indicated that although not statistically significant, both groups showed a notable decrease in anxiety with a marginally significant main effect of time ( F 1 =3.485; P =.07; η 2 =0.047) but no significant main effect of group and no significant interaction effect of time with group.
Coexpressed genes showed marginally significant evidence ( P = 0.07) of coevolution of the lengths of intergenic regions, but the extent of coevolution for intergenic lengths was significantly less than for intron lengths (e.g., partial Pearson correlation coefficients of genes belonging to the same GTEx coexpression clusters were significantly higher in the case of introns than intergenic regions; P = 7.4 × 10 − 8 ).
23 Only 2 studies examined the effects of MI on the GI, revealing a marginally significant decrease in the index for the MI group compared to the control group (SMD = −0.29, P = .07). 23 , 38 These findings suggest that MI promotes the recovery of gingival tissues, although this requires additional experimental confirmation.
The improvements are statistically significant ( p < 0.05) for all six configurations, with the exception of the Aloha-Aloha configuration where the difference is marginally significant ( p = 0.07).
Follow-up tests showed that the difference between central and noncentral blocks was significant, t (23) = 2.73, p = .01 (one-tailed directional t test: p = .006), 4 Cohen’s d = .55; the differences between central-signal and no-signal blocks, and between no-signal and noncentral blocks were marginally significant; t (23) = 1.91, p = .07 (one-tailed directional t test: p = .035), Cohen’s d = .39, and t (23) = 1.81, p = .08 (one-tailed directional t test: p = .041), Cohen’s d = .37, respectively.
This dose-response reduction was marginally significant when the treatments were conducted in air ( p = 0.07), but not significant when they were conducted anaerobically. 3.3.
When the spatial and memory blocks were contrasted, there were main effects of block [ F (1,10) = 12.6, P < 0.01], precue type [ F (1,10) = 10.0, P < 0.05] and a marginally significant interaction between block and precue [ F (1,10) = 4.1, P = 0.07].
For hue responses, we found a marginally significant group difference in proportion of “target” responses, with synesthetes producing more “target” responses than controls; Medians: α TS = 0.78, α TC = 0.66; p = .07.
This study focused on anterior frontal (FPF1/2) sites, but the effect was also marginally significant for F3/4 and F7/8 ( p < 0.07) [ 49 ].
Neutrophil concentration showed marginally significant interactions between treatment and time ( P = 0.07), with higher levels in the PM40 group.
In step 3 models in the BA condition, only change in weight was a marginally significant predictor ( p = .07).
There was a similarly marginally significant negative linear relationship (F = 3.72; df = 1, 20; r 2 = 0.16; p = 0.07) between sum counts of T. castaneum and dome trap distance from incoming unshelled peanut product.
After permutation, bipolar I was correlated with a higher prevalence of psychosis at a marginally significant level (estimate = 0.32, SE = 0.07, p = 0.07), see Tables 3 and 4 , Figures S7–S14 for details.
The pallidum–vermis IV&V connectivity also showed a negative correlation with amotivation ( Spearman’s ρ = −0.34, P = .013), which failed to survive FDR correction, and became marginally significant after adjusting for illness duration and medication dosage ( Spearman’s ρ = −0.29, P = .07; see Figure 4B ).
The changes in ADHD-RS-IV scores were marginally significant at posttreatment ( p = 0.07), significant at the 1-month follow-up ( p = 0.01), and nonsignificant at the 3-month follow-up ( p = 0.14).
The increases of 1,25(OH) 2 D concentrations at 16-weeks in the 4000 IU group versus the placebo or 600 IU group was marginally significant ( p = 0.07 and 0.08, respectively).
“base + 12 month” condition (0 = base, 1 = base + 12 months) was marginally significant in predicting participants’ willingness to buy the car [ b = 21.01, t (2,379) = 1.83, partial r = -0.04, p = 0.07].
Furthermore, a marginally significant difference in DTI-ALPS left was observed between the post-RT-RE+ and post-RT-RE− groups ( p = 0.07).