“marginally significant”

Notably, within the high-efficacy group (SE > 44), self-efficacy itself showed a marginally significant negative association with job satisfaction ( β = −0.542, p = 0.071), suggesting a potential saturation effect or complex interplay where very high efficacy, in the absence of sufficient passion or other factors, might not further enhance satisfaction and could even be associated with different dynamics (e.g., heightened sensitivity to unmet expectations).

When COVID-19 stress scores were entered into the model, the gene x collection time interaction was marginally significant (p=0.071), with youth with higher stress scores reporting higher externalizing behaviors regardless of their genotype.

The SOI did not have a significant trend over the full monitoring period that might lead to a trend in SST, but there has been a marginally significant (p = 0.071) trend in the SOI over the satellite era (Fig.

For the arousal ratings, a three-way ANOVA revealed the significant main effect of stimulus type, indicating higher arousal ratings for normal than for anti- expressions, F (1,36) = 57.41, p = 0.000, η 2 p = 0.615, and marginally significant main effect of group, F (1,36) = 3.47, p = 0.071, η 2 p = 0.088.

γ-H2AX expression in TS-overexpressing human tumors was marginally significant as compared with that in TS-negative tumors ( P = 0.071; Figure 8E ).

The alpha-diversity (Shannon and Chao1 indexes) was evaluated for each group at each timepoint, and only the Chao1 index showed a marginally significant difference when CRC1 and CRC2 rats were compared ( p = 0.071) ( Figure 7 A).

There was a marginally significant difference in AUC between these two models ( z = 1.805, P < 0.071).

There was a marginally significant association between cognitive deficit and education ( p = 0.071), and no significant association was found with the other variables analyzed, as can be seen in Table 3 .

Using the same confounders as in Table 4 , and adjusted for log2 (dietary intake), only one marginally significant dietary pattern (factor) was discovered ( p = 0.071) based on nutrient densities.

Total mealybug abundance was significantly affected by site (ANOVA, F 3,36 = 3.748, p = 0.001), and marginally significant for a site x CWB infection status interaction (F 6,36 = 2.155, p = 0.071).

OPI improved significantly by 57% to about 1.5 OPI units with SIME (p = 0.0026) and by 4% with HA; treatment difference in changes from baseline was statistically significant for ITT population (p = 0.047) and marginally significant for PP population (p = 0.071) in favour of SIME (Fig.

The results showed a marginally significant main effect of emotion on LPP amplitude [ F (2, 122) = 2.806, p = 0.071, η 2 p = 0.044], with fearful emotion ( M = 8.884, SD = 0.805) eliciting greater LPP amplitudes than happy emotion ( M = 7.177, SD = 0.953).

In the same model, the prior suspension × condition interaction was somewhat reduced and became marginally significant, b = 0.042, P = 0.071 (table S26).

In the Nogo condition, there were significant main effect for group (F(1,40) = 5.17, p = .028 , η p 2 = 0.114) and electrodes (F(1,40) = 5.39, p = .025 , η p 2 = 0.119) and their interaction effect was marginally significant (F(1,40) = 3.44, p = .071 , η p 2 = 0.079).

The number of retrieved lymph nodes and tumor differentiation were marginally significant between the two groups (P=0.071 and 0.053, respectively).

In the group of learners we observed a significant positivity from 330 to 386 ms (cluster mass permutation test, p < .01) and a marginally significant negativity from 416 to 450 ms (cluster mass permutation test, p = .071) in the left fronto-central region after Rule deviants.

sad: p = .009), and the sad over neutral comparison remains marginally significant after the Bonferroni post-hoc correction (p = .071).

Further, the difference between L1 Mismatch and control was marginally significant for AHE [ b = 0.71, χ 2 (1) = 7.57, p = 0.071] but not for NE [ b = 0.50, χ 2 (1) = 0.00, p = 1.00].

Changes (post‐pre) in scores for all clinical and psychological variables were statistically significant ( P < .05) except DSST, which showed a marginally significant increase ( P = .071). 3.2.

The main effect of feedback was marginally significant, with increased switching observed after the absence of reward compared to receiving a reward (23.1% and 21.3%), F (1, 51) = 3.39, p = 0.071, η p 2 = 0.06.

Results of Combined rsMRI and DAT-SPECT Data Analyses In partial correlation analyses only controlling for covariates of no interest but not for shared variance between DAT striatal binding and SFC, the UPRDS I subscale showed a marginally significant correlation with SFC total regions ( r = -0.22, p = 0.071) ( Figure 3A ).

We found that the gene expression data explained marginally significant proportions of the variance in nodal AR 2 values for the DBNs (39.2%, P = 0.071) (Figure 7A , right).

A positive overall perception of marbled crayfish is associated with study site, as participants in Analamanga showed a significant (p<0.001) positive association (+0.749 index score) and Ihosy a marginally significant (p = 0.071) negative association (-0.182 index score) compared to Fianarantsoa (controlling for gender, age and livelihood).

The main effect of the display condition was marginally significant ( H (2) = 5.294, p = 0.071).

In addition, P_morphosyntactic errors of the ASD group was generally higher than the NT group but the difference is marginally significant (ASD: M = 3.93, Mdn = 3.14, IQR = 3.17; NT: M = 2.20, Mdn = 2.07, IQR = 2.53; U = 282.0, p = 0.071, r = 0.351).