“marginally significant”

Similar to the occurrence of ASE, being frail was a significant risk factor for not fasting during the entire Ramadan period, while older age was marginally significant, p = 0.076.

The main effect of neuroticism on the hands-on-steering-wheel time was marginally significant [ F (1,30) = 3.310, p = 0.076].

The change in destructive leadership showed marginally significant individual variability (slope σ 2 = 0 0.012, p = 0.076).

Noteworthy, in the low-KmO 2 app group, the highest COA peak was achieved in response to the second O 2 addition (10 μM of cumulative [O 2 ]) rather than to the first in six out of seven calibrations (marginally significant difference between 5 and 10 μM O 2 responses, p=0.076, paired t -test).

However, only a marginally significant difference was found in the CST group ( p = 0.076), with a small effect size (r = 0.348).

Results in Table 4 indicated that gender differences had a statistically marginally significant influence on the participants' TORP: χ 2 (1, N = 262) = 3.147, p = . 076.

The posterior region (LH: CHs 5, 7, 10; RH: CHs 15, 18, 20) had a significant main effect of age, F (1, 19) = 4.82, p = .041, partial η 2 = .20, and condition, F (1, 19) = 6.53, p = .004, partial η 2 = .26, and a marginally significant interaction effect between age and hemisphere, F (1, 19) = 3.51, p = .076, partial η 2 = .16 (all other p s ≥ .22).

The Session x Run interaction for the linear contrast was marginally significant ( F [1] , [7] = 4.31, p = 076), reflecting the steeper increase in the first two sessions compared to Sessions 3 and 4.

Patient-centered care was marginally significant ( P = .0764).

CDE: 0.7805 ± 0.2826 , t 41 = 2.4221 , p = 0.0199 , and d = 0.7301 ) states, while post hoc within-group analysis revealed a significant increase in β for YC ( t 23 = 2.9613 and p = 0.0070 , and d = 0.5845 ) but not in the CDE group, as for the latter the difference was marginally significant ( t 18 = 1.8776 , p = 0.0767 , and d = 0.4125 ).

These results show that marginally significant trends exist in the results of men ( p = 0.0769) and women ( p = 0.0788), respectively.

The contribution of the absent predictor was significant for lag 3 ( p = .037), marginally significant for lag 2 (p = .077), and not significant for the other lags.

The age- and gender-adjusted BOLD–CSF coupling was also compared across different apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene carriers and showed a marginally significant ( p = 0.077) dependency on the copies of APOE ε4 alleles ( Fig 2D ).

A repeated measures ANOVA on RTs showed a significant load effect [ F (1,17) = 97.64, MS e = 3791.33, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.85], a significant reward effect [ F (2,34) = 13.13, MS e = 639.96, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.44], and a marginally significant interaction between them [ F (2,32) = 2.77, MS e = 662.64, p = 0.077, η p 2 = 0.14].

Furthermore, a marginally significant difference in the number of MR-1 cells was observed among diphenyl Pt- thiosemicarbazone complex treatment groups (p = 0.077), and an increasing trend in the number of cells was noted from ~5.0 × 10 8 cells (methanol control group) to ~5.8 × 10 8 cells (20ppm).

The linear mixed model of PMBR power was marginally significant, F (7,74) = 1.926, p = 0.077.

A marginally significant effect of the PA on the ASLs was revealed (H = 55.7, df = 42, p = 0.077) in patients.

At the Fz electrode, the main effect of the conditions was marginally significant (F(1,19) = 3.5, p = 0.077) and that of the colour-hue groups was significant (F(3,57) = 12, p < 0.001), with a significant interaction (F(3,57) = 3.9, p = 0.0056).

Also, like in Experiment 1 , only the attend leading flash PSS (albeit marginally significant, p = 0.077, z = −1.771), but not the attend lagging flash PSS (p = 0.872, z = −0.161), was different relative to the pretest PSS [ Fig.

Furthermore, the former had a higher frequency of high fracture risk than the latter, although the difference was marginally significant (52.5% vs. 37.3%; p = 0.077; Figure S2 A).

Ongoing task reaction time: The main effect of group was marginally significant, F (1, 102) = 3.20, p = 0.077, η p 2 = 0.03.

Further correlation analysis across the whole sample revealed that the change (post-session minus pre-session) of NoGo-ACC was significantly negatively correlated with the change of PSQI ( r = -0.33, p = 0.033) and marginally significant negatively correlated with PSQI-SL ( r = -0.28, p = 0.077), while showing no significant correlation with ISI ( r = -0.21, p = 0.188) or PSQI-DF ( r = -0.22, p = 0.163).

The p-value for the region was marginally significant (p = 0.077), indicating that there may be some regional differences in reliance on these applications.

Of critical interest were paths ab (i.e., the indirect effects of daydreaming on social adaptation via loneliness), which were significant for daydreams that made participants feel more connected (β = 0.12, SE = 0.06, p = 0.047, 95% CI[0.02, 0.22]) and positive (β = 0.14, SE = 0.06, p = 0.033, 95% CI[0.03, 0.24]), marginally significant for daydreams that made participants feel less lonely (β = –0.13, SE = 0.07, p = 0.077, 95% CI[–0.24, –0.01]), and were more positive in content (β = 0.16, SE = 0.07, p = 0.013, 95% CI[0.06, 0.27]), and less fanciful (β = –0.19, SE = 0.09, p = 0.024, 95% CI[–0.35, –0.05]).

While most other physical health conditions, including digestive complaints, diabetes, chronic headaches, and sleep difficulties did not significantly predict body satisfaction, skin rash presented a marginally significant positive association ( p = 0.077).