The results of the sensitivity analysis remained marginally significant for suicide attempts (OR = 0.481, Beta = −0.730, CI: [0.203–1.051], p = 0.077) but not for suicidal ideation (OR = 0.655, Beta = −0.422, CI: [0.315–1.352], p = 0.251).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
There was a marginally significant format x cruise interaction on likelihood to visit a Caribbean resort, F 1,307 = 3.15, p = .077.
However, this trend was absent within Blackwater Lake (P = 0.963), generating a marginally significant lake*color interaction in the full 3-lake model (F 2,97 = 2.63, P = 0.077).
This analysis found that ESR was reduced at a marginally significant level ( P = 0.077) ( Table 2 ).
Initial analysis revealed a marginally significant correlation between mother and child OT levels ( r = 0.26, p = 0.077), suggesting potential coordination in baseline neuroendocrine states within dyads.
The contribution of the absent predictor was significant for lag 3 ( p = .037), marginally significant for lag 2 (p = .077), and not significant for the other lags.
Abouheif's test with different proximity matrices were also not significant even though patristic distance retrieved marginally significant results (p = 0.077 – original; p = 0.099 – Thioulouse, p = 0.044 - patristic).
At the 20–50 cm depth, climate had a marginally significant effect on phosphorus ( P = 0.077) and a very highly significant effect on silt content ( P < 0.0001).
A one-way ANOVA on the mean proportion of gaze points to the target object relative to the non-target object on the first question of the first trial revealed a marginally significant difference between conditions, F (2, 42) = 2.73 p = 0.077 (see Figure 4 ).
The 3-way interaction of group × time × segment was marginally significant ( χ 2 (1) = 3.14, p = .077) and the 2-way interaction of group × segment ( χ 2 (1) = 0.86, p = .353) was non-significant for group × time ( χ 2 (1) = .67, p = .155).
This increase was significant in one of the ROIs defined by the functional localizer [ left-push > rest : t (20) = 1.8, p = 0.043; but left-push > right-push : t (20) = −0.16, n.s.] and marginally significant in the ROI defined by the pushing-related activation across the three time points during the experiment [ left-push > rest : t (20) = 1.48, p = 0.077].
At 9 weeks, NL3 R451C microbial communities had a marginally significant decrease in utilization of the carbohydrate i‐Erythritol (paired t (4) = 2.36, P < 0.077; Fig.
Although oxygen saturation at ICU admission was marginally significant (85.0 (±11.28) and 89.0 (±10.47) for MRG and NMRG respectively, p = 0.077).
Was social daydreaming linked with helping behaviour and the desire to connect with others? Helping A one-way between-subjects ANOVA revealed a marginally significant main effect of condition on helping, F (2, 121) = 2.85, p = .077, = .05.
Similar findings emerged in terms of fT4, which had significant links with general fatigue (β = 0.35, p = 0.038) and marginally significant links with physical fatigue (β = 0.32, p = 0.077), while mental fatigue was found unrelated to fT4 (β = 0.13, p = 0.481).
ROI Analyses The two (distance: far, near) × two (category: green, blue) repeated-measure ANOVA of the percent signal change for each ROI showed a significant effect of distance in the left V4 [ F (1, 16) = 6.71, p = 0.020, partial η 2 0.296] and marginally significant in the right V4 [ F (1, 16) = 3.58, p = 0.077, partial η 2 = 0.183], as the near colors produced larger responses than the far colors ( Figure 3C ).
Correlations Implicit-explicit correlations In the non-dysphoric group, the IAT and ideal self-evaluations (SR Ideal) correlated positively, r = 0.43, n = 35, p = .009, while a marginally significant positive correlation appeared between the IAT and actual self-evaluations (SR Actual), r = 0.30, n = 35, p = .077.
However, a marginally significant mean difference of 0.79 ± 1.72 mm was found for changes in the buccal aspect of the alveolar crest ( p = 0.077).
The main effect of Emotion was marginally significant ( F 1,39 = 3.289, p = 0.077, η p 2 = 0.078, BF incl = 0.399 suggesting anecdotal evidence), with a higher sensitivity for happiness than fear.
Mid3rd exhibited a significant decrease with age before COVID-19 infection ( p = 0.021), and npxG showed a marginally significant decrease with age before COVID-19 infection ( p = 0.077).
In the full-factorial model including age, the main effect comparing accuracy between the encoding and recognition phases was diminished, although it remained marginally significant ( P = 0.077).
A marginally significant interaction effect, t (137) = 1.78, p = .077, b = 0.15, points at the interpretation that users’ consumption time was especially reduced across the 6 wk if participants, in the beginning of the experiment, showed a high understanding of how problematic digital consumption is in general.
Friedman’s test showed statistically significant changes over 0, 20 and 60 dpt in creatinine levels ( P = 0.026, K = 0.502), AST ( P = 0.012, K = 0.485), ALP ( P < 0.001, K = 0.641), and marginally significant changes in uremia ( P = 0.077, K = 0.420) and ALT ( P = 0.082, K = 0.421).
The main effect of brain regions was also significant, F (2,124) = 132.134, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.681, as P2 amplitudes were greater in central ( M = 8.786 μV, SE = 0.391) than centro-parietal area ( M = 7.072 μV, SE = 0.392).The three-way interaction was marginally significant, F (2,124) = 2.639, p = 0.077, η p 2 = 0.041.
As shown in Table 1 (Model 1), the GLMM revealed a marginally significant positive main effect of testosterone ( b = 0.353, standard error (SE) = 0.200, 95% CI [0.962, 2.106], z = 1.767, p = 0.077); higher testosterone levels predicted increased risk-taking behavior across both conditions ( Figure 2 a).