“marginally significant”

A marginally significant association of full moon with suicide occurrence was noted for women with a history of hospital-treated psychiatric disorders ( p = 0.078), but the percentages of patients having received treatment for psychiatric disorders was statistically not significantly different between pre- and peri/post-menopausal women.

In contrast, we found a non-significant deviation for the trial group, d = 0.05, p = 0.420, and only a marginally significant deviation for the table group, d = 0.06, p = 0.078.

The correlation between complicated liver cirrhosis and hypotension was marginally significant ( r = 0.125, P = 0.078) (Table 2 ).

For RII biomass , significant/marginally significant difference was found for cushions in the size classes III ( p = 0.078) and IV ( p = 0.017), but not in classes I ( p = 0.768) and II ( p = 0.324).

A marginally significant difference in the neoantigen scores between the responders and PD groups was observed (p-value = 0.078).

Moreover, there was a marginally significant relationship with being connected and supported (LISD state 2; β = −0.10, SE = 0.05, p = 0.078).

Effects of DAN+/DN-tDCS on ANT performance Paired-sample t-tests indicated that DAN+/DN-tDCS significantly enhanced executive effect performance ( t = 2.245, p = 0.037, Cohen’s d = 0.502) and yielded marginally significant changes in orienting effect ( t = −0.861, p = 0.078, Cohen’s d = −0.416).

For the discrimination task, the similarity ratio was a significant predictor of collective benefit using similarity from day 1 ( B = 0.71, SE = 0.27, t (18) = 2.60, p = 0.018, 95% CI [0.13, 1.29]) and marginally significant for calculating similarity for day 2 ( B = 0.34, t (18) = 1.87, p = 0.078, 95% CI [−0.04, 0.73]).

The Semantic relation × Sensory-motor relation interaction was also marginally significant [ F (1, 22) = 3.41, p = 0.078], but given its theoretical relevance we also explored the corresponding simple effects.

The Stimulus type (T, [VT + nostim – V]) × Group (deaf, hearing) ANOVA on P100 amplitudes revealed a marginally significant main effect of Stimulus type, F (1, 18) = 3.50, p = 0.078, with larger amplitudes for [VT + nostim – V] than for unisensory tactile responses T ( M = 4.0 vs. 3.2 μV), indicating a tendency for multisensory interactions about 100 ms after stimulus presentation in both deaf and hearing participants.

The significant interaction was mainly due to the very small difference between Cz (5.42 μV) and FCz (5.58 μV; p = 0.528) in win condition and the difference between Cz (3.38 μV) and FCz (2.96 μV) was marginally significant in loss condition ( p = 0.078).

After Bonferroni corrections, two marginally significant correlations were found: a positive correlation between medium beeps and the perceptual abilities subscale of Gold-MSI ( r = .344, p = .078), and a negative one between short balls and the emotions subscale ( r = .349, p = .072).

Explicit attitudes had a significant positive correlation with implicit attitudes ( r = 0.41, p < 0.001) and chocolate evaluation ( r = 0.21, p = 0.040), and a marginally significant positive correlation with chocolate consumption ( r = 0.18, p = 0.078).

Comparison of Chinese and German participants regarding these composite scores revealed a marginally significant difference ( t (138) = 1.78, p = .078, d = .30).

Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that SATB1-high group had a worse overall survival ( P =0.078, marginally significant).

This indicates a reduced but marginally significant (p = 0.078) greater estimated proportion of Mtb infection as defined by TST compared to IGRA even when restricting our sample to a population where the possibility of BCG cross-reactivity was minimized.

Finally, participants who provided EEG data at the first versus second timepoint did not significantly differ by demographic characteristics or on the study variables ( p s > .38), except for a marginally significant difference in sex distribution across timepoints [χ 2 (1) = 3.11, p = .078].

Regarding cooperation skills, the intervention had a marginally significant positive effect on increasing them among third grade boys (0.528, p = 0.078), whereas for the first graders the effect was slightly negative, but again not significantly different from zero (-0.328, p = 0.234).

The effect of children was significant or marginally significant for eating out, β = −0.143, 95% CI [−0.508, 0.027], p = 0.078; housework, β = −0.215, 95% CI [−0.584, −0.081], p = 0.010; physical exercises, β = 0.163, 95% CI [0.002, 0.330], p = 0.048; and watching videos, β = −0.208, 95% CI [−0.394, −0.050], p = 0.012.

The interaction between CM and validity was marginally significant, F (1, 37) = 3.29, p = 0.078, and η 2 = 0.08, and the simple effects analysis revealed a significant difference between C+ and C−, regardless of the validity of the cue [valid: F (1, 37) = 12.92, p = 0.001,η 2 = 0.26; invalid: F (1, 37) = 23.87, p < 0.001, and η 2 = 0.39].

For blueback herring, changes in mean length showed marginally significant differences among stocks ( F 3, 13 = 2.861, P = 0.078), with the Southern New England and Mid-Atlantic Stocks declining more steeply than the Northern New England and Southern Atlantic Stocks (although Tukey's HSD did not reveal any pairwise differences to be significant) ( Fig. 5 C; Fig.

Differences in idea flexibility (range of idea categories) and idea originality (novelty of ideas) also favored the no real-time feedback condition, though these were marginally significant ( p = 0.078 and p = 0.067, respectively).

The results revealed a marginally significant between-group difference (t = 1.78, p = 0.078, IC al 95% 0.18-3.33).

We additionally compared the correlation coefficients between age groups, and found there was a marginally significant difference, z = −1.76, p = 0.078.

Coronary angiography 3 days later showed proximal LAD 100% occlusion, with retrograde distal filling, and 99% stenosis of distal RCA. Reduced RVM scores Mixed model analysis with the above outcome indicated that there was a marginally significant interaction between factors group and exercise stage (p-value = 0.0783).