“marginally significant”

The reduction in pain intensity was marginally significant after adjusting for baseline values (P = 0.08) and there was no significant difference between the two groups after adjusting for all covariates (P = 0.11).

stricta , there was a marginally significant, negative relationship between flower density treatment and the total number of visits ( F 2,24 = 2.67, p = 0.08; Figure 1 A, Table S1A ) and a significant, negative relationship with the per-unit resource visitation rate ( F 2,24 = 5.42, p = 0.01; Figure 1 C, Table S1A ), suggesting resource dilution effects.

A wilcoxon signed rank test on residuals indicates that asterids I are marginally significant ( p = 0.08) for lacking diversity (two sided, μ = 0) but other groups (gymnosperms, p = 0.25; magnoliids, p = 0.20; rosids I, p = 0.97; rosids II, p = 0.63; asterids II, p = 0.63) show no detectable biases in diversity.

30 Variables marginally significant ( P < .08) at the bivariate (unadjusted) level were entered into a multiple logistic regression model; sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess models with a dichotomous outcome versus a categorical outcome.

Among the three groups of boys, tests of overall mean differences were significant for English achievement, χ 2 (2) = 14.29, p < 0.001, and marginally significant for mathematics achievement χ 2 (2) = 5.13, p = 0.08.

The interaction between environment and exercise was marginally significant, F (1, 27) = 3.34, p = 0.08, and η p 2 = 0.11, suggesting that negative affect decreased more after exercise in the indoor condition than in the outdoor condition, see Table 1 .

Bonferonni-corrected comparisons between saccade amplitudes across experiment at each level of saccade direction axis and stimulus type revealed only a few marginally significant differences between amplitudes across experiments (all t < 2.19, p > 0.08).

There was a significant correlation between posterior DMN connectivity and overall mean cortical flortaucipir SUVr in the DLB group ( r = −0.39, P = 0.04), while this was marginally significant in the Alzheimer’s disease dementia group ( r = −0.35, P = 0.08) and there was no significant correlation in the control group ( r = −0.13, P = 0.20; Fig. 3A ).

A marginally significant Target Type × Cycle [ F (5, 50) = 2.63, p = 0.08, η p 2 = 0.20] and a significant Cue Type × Target Type × Cycle [ F (10, 100) = 3.55, p < 0.05, η p 2 = 0.26] interactions were also obtained.

This trend was marginally significant (ANOVA p = 0.08) in the 0–2 cm depth interval (Figure 1 ; n = 6 N-fertilized vs. n = 6 unfertilized samples, However, gene copy number normalized per gdw was not significantly different among treatments in the 0–2 cm depth interval (data not shown).

The final model of PLSPM analysis showed that bottom-water oxygen had a strong positive effect on bioturbation ( P < 0.001), metazoan diversity ( P < 0.001), faunal respiration ( P < 0.001), and microbial aerobic respiration ( P < 0.001) and a negative direct effect on organic matter accumulation (C org , chlorophyll a, and THAA; marginally significant P = 0.08) and microbial anaerobic respiration ( P < 0.01).

Furthermore, we observed a marginally significant interaction between product visibility and integration between identities ( b = 0.57, SE = 0.33, z (1) = 1.76, p = .08).

The total oxidation ( C soil + C atm ) was significant from zero in all plant communities and treatment, except for the OTC plots in TT being marginally significant ( p = 0.08). 3.4.

Residence in an area of higher socioeconomic vulnerability was a marginally significant predictor, OR (95% CI ) = 3.1 (0.9–11.0), p = .08.

Multiple variable models Males In the nested model, the effects of economic deprivation, living with a spouse and smoking were statistically significant; unemployment was marginally significant ( P = 0.08).

Furthermore, the main effect for body location was marginally significant ( F 2,120 =2.52, P =.08, η p 2 =.04).

The same pattern of results was obtained when analyses were limited to CN participants, with significant PP X Age X APOE interaction effects on the Picture Sequence Memory Test ( β = 0.17; p = .039) and the Cognitive Function Composite: β = 0.17; p = .042), and marginally significant PP X Age X APOE interaction effects on the List Sorting Working Memory Test ( β = 0.14; p = .080) and the Fluid Cognition Composite ( β = 0.15; p = .058).

Even after controlling for sociodemographic variables, inmates who reported problem drinking and psychedelic drug use experiences were about two times more likely to express suicidal ideation than their counterparts [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 2.43, p < 0.001 for problem drinking; adjusted OR = 2.13, p < 0.001 for drug use], while the association between physical activity and suicidal ideation was marginally significant (adjusted OR = 1.34, p = 0.08).

4a ), we found a significant interaction between time-period and layer effects ( F = 30.34, P = 0.0004) at 10–25 Hz and a marginally significant interaction ( F = 3.90, P = 0.080) and period effect ( F = 3.75, P = 0.085) at 25–40 Hz (Supplementary Fig. 4a ), as well as a significant layer effect during the cue and delay periods (Fig. 3b ; F = 11.58, P = 0.0078 for cue; F = 5.54, P = 0.043 for delay).

Additionally, we observed three significant correlations of modules in adult females from closed habitats: trunk+hindlimbs ( r = 0.23; p = 0.014), forelimbs ( r = 0.22; p = 0.030) and trunk (marginally significant r = 0.17; p = 0.080).

A marginally significant association with ‘ban people who are born after the year 2010 from smoking CCs’ (AOR=0.71, 95% CI: 0.49–1.05, p=0.08) was also observed. ‘Unknown’ perceptions were associated with less support for each of the 5 individual policy items, all 5 policy items, at least 1 policy item and ‘banning the sale of CCs’ (all p<0.05).

There was marginally significant correlation between serum CK on admission and higher sodium levels ( P = .08).

When the personal income per US state and Gini index were controlled, the negative association remained marginally significant (worldwide: r (41) = -.270, p = .080; US: r (46) = -.281, p = .053).

Paired t tests revealed a marginally significant, yet clinically meaningful, decrease in patient’s cancer symptoms ( t = 2.32, P = .08; MDASI mean; pre = 1.75, post = 1.04).

TFM became marginally significant ( p = 0.080).