“marginally significant”

Occupation reveals a marginally significant association ( p = 0.04), though the Likelihood Ratio ( p = 0.14) suggests weaker evidence.

In addition, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests revealed no significantly different fungal species (q < 0.05) between the SLE and SLE_post groups, except for a marginally significant change observed in Aspergillus terreus c60 ( p = 0.04, Table S10 ).

With regards to ICSI, a marginally significant difference was seen in LBR in men with low SDF compared to those with high SDF (5 studies, 445 couples; RR 1.11, 95% CI, 1.00–1.23, P=0.04) ( 44 ).

One locus, TpMSAT05, exhibited a marginally significant deviation from Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) ( χ 2 = 16.44, DF = 8, P = 0.04), though this deviation was not significant after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons (corrected α = 0.013).

Association of SNPs with PCa risk or disease aggressiveness When each of the SNPs was analyzed separately, age-adjusted logistic regression analysis demonstrated that Hispanic Caucasian carriers of the GG genotype when compared with the CC genotype showed a marginally significant decreased risk for PCa (OR = 0.31, P = 0.04, 95% CI = 0.10–0.96; Table IV ).

In the HFBS total score analysis, only agreeableness was a marginally significant predictor for a higher score (–0.75 [0.35], p = 0.04) ( Table 4 ).

After stratification by sex, there was a marginally significant negative association of SAF with FN‐BMD only in females (β = −0.051; p = .04) in a fully adjusted model.

The expiration/inspiration ratio showed a marginally significant benefit (WMD = 0.05, 95%CI 0.00 to 0.09, P = 0.040).

In C1/2 recipients, reduction of NRM by ATG was less pronounced, yet marginally significant, if all ATG doses were included (RR, 0.61; p = 0.04; n = 363), and was slightly more pronounced if only the lower ATG dose levels were considered (RR, 0.56; p = 0.026; n = 320).

Fisher’s combined probability test did not show statistically significant evidence for association ( P = 0.54); yet, Stouffer’s Z score method which considers the direction of association showed a marginally significant collective evidence for association with SDR at these 34 loci ( P = 0.04).

In the male group, the correlation was marginally significant only for the R-BMD ( r = 0.25, p = 0.04); other BMD indices did not correlate with CAP.

Additionally, this approach provided weak evidence for a causal association with mRNFL thickness, with a marginally significant IVW estimate (−0.98 μm per SD increase in the instrument; 95% CI, −1.89 to −0.07; P = 0.04) and consistent, albeit insignificant, estimates across all alternative MR methods.

When SNVs were classified by functional effect, only “missense near splice site” mutations were marginally significant ( P =0.04, Supplementary Figure 1 ).

Marginally significant differences between the task-switch conditions were observed (F (2,68) = 3.37, p = 0.04, BF 10 = 0.64), although with inconclusive Bayes factor.

The reduction in reticulocyte count was marginally significant (p=0.04).

Differences in genetic diversity across populations were marginally nonsignificant when heterozygosity was considered ( F 5,35 = 2.32, P = 0.06) and marginally significant for allelic richness ( F 5,35 = 2.58, P = 0.04).

Interestingly, post-hoc simple comparisons of each phase of the menstrual cycle also revealed that emotional word advantage was significantly greater in LVF than RVF during the menstruation phase ( F (1, 9) = 7.8611, p = .02), marginally significant during the follicular phase (F(1, 9) = 5.8, p = .04) and not significant during the early, mid- and late luteal phases ( p >.05).

Experiment 2: Epifauna (Core Samples) For core-sampled epifauna in Experiment 2, the only community metric on which landscape size had a marginally significant effect was community evenness ( P = 0.04, Fig 8C ).

Genes DUSP10, NUDT1 and PPTRE showed marginally significant reduction ( p = 0.04), and gene DUSP11 showed more pronounced reduction beyond control ( p = 0.003).

Although there were marginally significant inverse correlations between platelet counts and Ly30 (r=−0.359, p=0.040 (uncorrected)) as well as Ly60 (r=−0.355, p=0.042 (uncorrected)) on bivariate correlation analysis, such correlations were no longer statistically significant on corrections for multiple comparison (see online supplementary table S3).

The thinnest pachymetry and anterior chamber depth showed a marginally significant difference between the baseline and the first consecutive scan (9.3 μ and 0.03 mm, respectively, P = 0.04).

There was a marginally significant association found between marker positivity and PR status (p = 0.04).

There was a marginally significant effect of NA treatment ( X 2 = 8.5, df = 3, P = 0.04).

In addition, we detected a marginally significant sex-by-diet interaction at hatching ( F 2,480 = 3.27, P = 0.04) but the effect was not present in the next few developmental stages ( F ≤2.11, P ≥0.11 for the next three stages).

The slope estimates did not differ significantly from zero for women in the three youngest age groups ( p > 0.25), and there was a marginally significant decrease in rates for women 35–39 years of age ( p = 0.04).