Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantP = .040.8× alphagold
trending toward significanceP = .0541.1× alpha
Interaction between treatment and continuous Trop-2 expression for OS was marginally significant (range, P = .04 to 0.05); interaction between treatment and Trop-2 H-score quartiles for OS was trending toward significance ( P = .054; Data Supplement, Table S5).
marginally significantp = 0.0400.8× alphagold
Pre-registered analyses isolated to false and true headlines revealed that the nudge was associated with a marginally significant reduction in false-headline sharing in both the 12.5% and 20% misinformation conditions; OR = 1.76, SE = 0.49, z = 2.05, p = 0.040 and OR = 1.70, SE = 0.40, z = 2.22, p = 0.026 respectively.
marginally significantP = 0.040.8× alphagold
Recently, a large-scale retrospective study ( n = 1048) based on National Cancer Database showed preoperative radiotherapy contributed to a prolonged OS with a marginally significant P value (log-rank P = 0.04), compared with patients receiving perioperative chemotherapy [ 19 ].
marginally significantp = 0.040.8× alphagold
Only the input resistance showed a marginally significant difference for the PD29–31 groups (sham 111 ± 12 MΩ vs. verum 148 ± 10 MΩ, p = 0.04). iTBS Effects on sPSCs The analysis of spontaneous synaptic currents was performed on a different set of animals and Cy3-WFA-labeled cells to prevent changes in the physiological conditions of the small FSI due to long recording times.
marginally significantp = 0.040.8× alphagold
Canadian Institutes of Health Research 10.13039/501100000024 Peter Boris Centre for Addictions Research 10.13039/100016810 National Institutes of Health 10.13039/100000002 U01DA041048 U01DA050989 U01DA051016 U01DA041022 U01DA051018 U01DA051037 U01DA050987 U01DA041174 U01DA041106 U01DA041117 U01DA041028 U01DA041134 U01DA050988 U01DA051039 U01DA041156 U01DA041025 U01DA041120 U01DA051038 U01DA041148 U01DA041093 U01DA041089 U24DA041123 U24DA041147 There was one marginally significant LDSC genetic correlation between Lack of Premeditation and Lack of Perseverance ( r g = 0.97, S.E. = 0.46, p = 0.04; Table S4 ) in ABCD.
marginally significantp = 0.040.8× alphagold
global evaluation method for each study participant Paired sample t -testing revealed no statistically significant differences between analytic and global evaluations for each study participant, except for professor 1 for indirect provisional evaluations, where there was a marginally significant difference between the global and analytic analysis ( p = 0.04) (Table 2 ), but these were not significant after correction for multiple comparisons (all p = 1.0).
marginally significantP =.040.8× alphagold
After sequential adjustment for demographic characteristics (sex, marital status, and race), smoking status, hearing impairment, and visual impairment (Models 2‐5), the HR for digital isolation was attenuated but remained marginally significant (eg, Model 5: HR 1.23; P =.04).