While the comparison between 2022 and 2023 was marginally significant ( p = 0.04).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
trending toward significanceP = .054
Interaction between treatment and continuous Trop-2 expression for OS was marginally significant (range, P = .04 to 0.05); interaction between treatment and Trop-2 H-score quartiles for OS was trending toward significance ( P = .054; Data Supplement, Table S5).
Pre-registered analyses isolated to false and true headlines revealed that the nudge was associated with a marginally significant reduction in false-headline sharing in both the 12.5% and 20% misinformation conditions; OR = 1.76, SE = 0.49, z = 2.05, p = 0.040 and OR = 1.70, SE = 0.40, z = 2.22, p = 0.026 respectively.
The overall effect of treatment was not found to be significant for hydroxycarbamide ( p = 0.23) but was marginally significant for donor A ( p = 0.04).
However, our direct comparison of classes also revealed that the differential for the heterochromatic mark H3K27me3 is significantly higher for LowOc than for HighOc sites (although the P -value = 0.04, which is marginally significant).
Recently, a large-scale retrospective study ( n = 1048) based on National Cancer Database showed preoperative radiotherapy contributed to a prolonged OS with a marginally significant P value (log-rank P = 0.04), compared with patients receiving perioperative chemotherapy [ 19 ].
Only the input resistance showed a marginally significant difference for the PD29–31 groups (sham 111 ± 12 MΩ vs. verum 148 ± 10 MΩ, p = 0.04). iTBS Effects on sPSCs The analysis of spontaneous synaptic currents was performed on a different set of animals and Cy3-WFA-labeled cells to prevent changes in the physiological conditions of the small FSI due to long recording times.
There was no significant difference in detecting IgM and IgG with Biolidics LFI and ELISA at D0 and D7 ( p = 1.00), except for marginally significant detection of IgM at D7 ( p = 0.04).
Canadian Institutes of Health Research 10.13039/501100000024 Peter Boris Centre for Addictions Research 10.13039/100016810 National Institutes of Health 10.13039/100000002 U01DA041048 U01DA050989 U01DA051016 U01DA041022 U01DA051018 U01DA051037 U01DA050987 U01DA041174 U01DA041106 U01DA041117 U01DA041028 U01DA041134 U01DA050988 U01DA051039 U01DA041156 U01DA041025 U01DA041120 U01DA051038 U01DA041148 U01DA041093 U01DA041089 U24DA041123 U24DA041147 There was one marginally significant LDSC genetic correlation between Lack of Premeditation and Lack of Perseverance ( r g = 0.97, S.E. = 0.46, p = 0.04; Table S4 ) in ABCD.
Moreover, there was a marginally significant negative correlation observed between serum levels of butyric acid and IL-6 in the hippocampus, r = −0.38, t (27) = −2.14, p = 0.04.
global evaluation method for each study participant Paired sample t -testing revealed no statistically significant differences between analytic and global evaluations for each study participant, except for professor 1 for indirect provisional evaluations, where there was a marginally significant difference between the global and analytic analysis ( p = 0.04) (Table 2 ), but these were not significant after correction for multiple comparisons (all p = 1.0).
The minimally-adjusted effects of long-term limiting illness and difficulty walking were likewise attenuated and became marginally significant ( p = 0.04) after adjusting for SEP.
However, on average, oncologists gave lower scores to females more often than males ( P =0.04; marginally significant).
In cases where vaccination status was undisclosed, a marginally significant gender difference was observed ( p = 0.04), though specific pairwise differences were not identified in post-hoc tests.
When each of the SNPs was analysed separately, marginally significant differences were observed for allele frequencies between sporadic cases and controls for three consecutive SNPs (−1001C/T, −263G/A, and −13C/T, P =0.04–0.07).
After sequential adjustment for demographic characteristics (sex, marital status, and race), smoking status, hearing impairment, and visual impairment (Models 2‐5), the HR for digital isolation was attenuated but remained marginally significant (eg, Model 5: HR 1.23; P =.04).
Additionally, marginally significant reductions in beta power (~0 to 1 min, P = 0.04, cluster corrected) were observed during the first minute post-DMT administration.
However, the aged effect on LT was very small and the P value was marginally significant in this study (P = 0.04).
In the male group, the correlation was marginally significant only for the R-BMD ( r = 0.25, p = 0.04); other BMD indices did not correlate with CAP.
We found that neonates from mothers with anosmia and ageusia had a higher value of WBC and lymphocytes ( p = 0.06, marginally significant and p = 0.04,) and AST ( p = 0.08, marginally significant).
There is a marginally significant interaction effect between Wolbachia status and genotype on recombination fraction ( P = 0.04, χ 2 test (N = 160, df = 7)).
We could not find any influence of biological sex on symptoms, PFTs parameters and HRCT abnormalities at all time points (data not shown), except for a marginally significant difference in the rate of anxiety (65.2% F vs 39% M, p = 0.04) at 6 months, that was not confirmed at 12 months.
In Group 4, LRT is marginally significant only in solitary bone metastases ( p = 0.04). 4.
The effect of environment was marginally significant [ F (2,22) = 2.9, p = 0.040] and as pairwise comparison showed, the accuracy in 3DNI and 3DI environments was slightly less than in 2DNI ( p = 0.08).
There were significant or marginally significant improvements from Follow-ups #2 to #3 after the booster training in the prevalence of the 2 items (54% to 88% for ability to define obesity, P = .040; and 58% to 88% for ability to screen patients, P = .079).