“marginally significant”

Marginally significant differences were found when comparing the mean TTR in 2013 to 2017 ( p = 0.04) and between 2013 and 2021 ( p = 0.02).

For these regions, the analysis indicated a significant main effect of Adaptation (V4: F 1,12 = 29.5, P < 0.001; VO: F 1,12 = 21.6, P < 0.001), and a significant Adaptation by Adaptor interaction (V4 marginally significant: F 1,12 = 5.1, P = 0.04; VO: F 1,12 = 7.4, P = 0.018).

Only the parafunctional habit networks were marginally significant in global strength (S = 1.21, p = 0.04) ( Supplementary Material S4 ).

Upon final analysis, there was significant benefit for SG in patients with the two highest quartiles of TROP2 expression (220–275 and 275–300), The interaction between treatment and continuous TROP2 expression for OS was marginally significant (range, P = 0.04–0.05), and the interaction between treatment and TROP2 H -score expression by quartiles for OS was trending toward significance ( P = 0.054).

Finally, when assessing how the source of inoculants affected microbial‐mediated tolerance, we found that laboratory stock (i.e., isolates maintained within laboratories, repositories, or other institutions) supported marginally significant biomass improvements under herbivory compared to commercial formulae or field isolates ( Q M = 6.70, p = 0.04; lab stock: d = 2.62 [1.26; 3.98]).

However, on average, oncologists gave lower scores to females more often than males ( P =0.04; marginally significant).

Furthermore, Stroop2 task resulted in a marginally significant negative correlation (R = −0.54, p = 0.04) between the individual task reaction times and the ROI-averaged HbO 2 responses from the PTSD group (See Fig. 8 ) while no significant correlation was seen in the control group.

Finally, the potential overlap of participants in the studies included in our meta‐analysis may have contributed to the marginally significant findings of plasma Aβ42 between the DS with and without AD groups ( z = 2.03, p = 0.04). 4.2 Tau In this meta‐analysis, we examined two forms of tau and found no significant differences in plasma t‐tau (non‐phosphorylated tau) and p‐tau181 (phosphorylated tau) concentrations between the DS population and the euploid controls.

Pooling autosomal mutations to compare against X mutations revealed a marginally significant difference in the autosomal versus X rate in PB306 ( P = 0.04, X 2 test) but not in the other three MA lines sets (0.30 < P < 0.86, X 2 tests).

While performance expectancy was marginally significant in Model 2 (OR = 1.202, P = 0.04), it did not retain significance in Model 3.

Further analysis of data subsets with similar age distribution across the three ethnicity groups (Pearson's Chi‐square test) revealed a marginally significant ( p = .04) trend toward more frequent hospitalization for Hispanic or Black/African American plasma donors in comparison to White/Caucasian American plasma donors ( Table S1 ), despite the underrepresentation of elderly donors in this subpopulation.

The secondary vectors mean outdoor host-seeking densities were marginally significant compared to the indoor densities for An. maculipalpis ( t 9 = 1.96, p < 0.04) and An. coustani s.l.

The statistical analysis indicated that there was no statistically significant effect in the mPFC (maxT = 2.12, p = 0.11), and a marginally significant overall effect in the latPFC (maxT = 2.45, p = 0.040).

When each of the SNPs was analysed separately, marginally significant differences were observed for allele frequencies between sporadic cases and controls for three consecutive SNPs (−1001C/T, −263G/A, and −13C/T, P =0.04–0.07).

We found that neonates from mothers with anosmia and ageusia had a higher value of WBC and lymphocytes ( p = 0.06, marginally significant and p = 0.04,) and AST ( p = 0.08, marginally significant).

There was a marginally significant positive relationship between δ 15 N and length for A. nigricans ( F 1,13 = 5.10, R 2 = .28, p = .04) and a significant negative relationship between δ 34 S and length for C. viridis ( F 1,16 = 10.38, R 2 = .39, p = .005) (Figure S1 ).

There was a marginally significant association found between marker positivity and PR status (p = 0.04).

Analyses were re-performed with multivariate outliers, and the results did not change except for the path between violence at time 2 predicting perfectionistic strivings at time 3 that became marginally significant (β = 1.23, p = 0.04) For the second model estimating the cross-lagged effect of perfectionistic concerns on violence towards the offspring, it showed adequate fit (χ 2 (4) = 80.5, p < 0.001; CFI = 0.87; TLI = 0.53; RMSEA = 0.29, 95% CI = [0.24, 0.34], SRMR = 0.06).

The marginally significant ( P = 0.04) sex difference in infection prevalence (higher prevalence in males) shown by this previous study was not significant in this study ( P = 0.09), despite a more than 28-fold increase in sample size (50 vs 1431 individuals).

25 In our study, non-optimally controlled patients had a marginally significant ( P =0.04) 11% increased risk of hospitalization than those with optimal control.

The only other pairwise combination between alleles at different loci showing significant LD was between sod1 D and infPhox S, which was marginally significant after Bonferroni correction (p = 0.04; S4 Table ); because these two rare (≤ 2% frequency) alleles co-occur in only three individuals, and because the more common alleles at these loci do not show LD, we dismissed this result as unlikely to be biologically meaningful.

There was no significant difference in detecting IgM and IgG with Biolidics LFI and ELISA at D0 and D7 ( p = 1.00), except for marginally significant detection of IgM at D7 ( p = 0.04).

However follow up bootstrap p values (based on 500 iterations) showed that the two cluster solution was marginally significant ( p = 0.04) whereas the three cluster solution was marginally non-significant ( p = 0.052) with the latter therefore a better fit to the data.

Thyroid Function As reported in Figure 2 , mean TSH at TP0 between the euthyroid and hypothyroid groups showed a small and marginally significant ( p = 0.04) difference.

We found that both the decrease in sensory information and the increase in categorical coding across cortical areas were well explained by their anatomical hierarchical level ( P ≤ 1 × 10 −5 for both), with only a marginally significant difference between them ( P = 0.04).