“marginally significant”

At the 50% feature level, the proposed method significantly outperformed MOGONET (mean difference: +0.077, p = 1.78 × 10 −15 ) and showed marginally significant improvement over Random Forest (mean difference: +0.028, p = 0.084).

A significant increase of total bilirubin (+1.97 mg/dL [+0.77; +3.44]; P =0.004) and a marginally significant decline in eGFR (−9.5 mL/min/1.73 m 2 [−16; −2]; P =0.084) were observed during the treatment with DTG plus ATV/r.

4.380 μV; t (46) = −2.902, p = 0.006); the group difference was marginally significant for the T3-T6 pair, where the amusic group again displayed reduced P3b amplitude (1.002 μV vs. 1.908 μV; t (46) = −1.767, p = 0.084); but the group difference was not significant for the T1-T4 pair (1.355 μV vs. 1.624 μV).

There was a marginally significant main effect of experiment type (F (1, 50) = 3.117, p = 0.084, η p 2 = 0.059).

Accordingly, all results are robust, except that different perceptions of how “smart” the authors of the AI-generated (versus human-generated) messages were seen to be became non-significant ( p = 0.504) and “unique” became marginally significant ( p = 0.084) and therefore these results are not visualized in Fig. 2 .

Symbols indicate significant (**, p < 0.01) correlation coefficients and significant (†, p < 0.05) or marginally significant (#, p = 0.084) differences from the corresponding correlation coefficients in the youngest (30~39 years) group.

The median length of residence was shorter among residents identified as MRSA positive than those who were MRSA negative, although a marginally significant association was found between these groups (2.8 months vs 5.5 months; p = 0.084) (Fig. 3 ).

fMRI results The mixed ANCOVAs calculated for the subregions of the ACC showed the following results: Spontaneous brain activity in the sgACC showed a significant effect of time ( F (2, 132) = 14.21, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.18), a marginally significant interaction effect between time and group ( F (4, 132) = 2.12, p = 0.084, η p 2 = 0.06), and no main effect of group.

Trial-by-Trial Regression Analysis on Generalization For the generalized linear regression with three kinds of response, there was a significant difference in generalization for expected value ( β = 0.07, SE = 0.02, z = 4.31, p < 0.001) and a marginally significant difference for URPE ( β = −0.03, SE = 0.02, z = −1.72, p = 0.084), but not for the outcome ( β = 0.001, SE = 0.01, z = 0.15, p = 0.883).

Although the differences were marginally significant, females spent less time in Iberia ( χ 2 = 2.99, df = 1, p = .084) and crossed the Strait of Gibraltar to Africa earlier than males ( χ 2 = 3.30, df = 1, p = .070).

This trend was statistically significant for the ordinal scale ( p = 0.047) and was marginally significant for the standard visual scale ( p = 0.084).

12.1%, P = 0.800) time intervals, the difference in PONV incidence between the continuous infusion group and the single injection group was marginally significant at the 6-24 h time interval (13.6 vs. 27.3%, P = 0.084) ( Fig. 1 ).

The indirect effect of solidarity on organized resistance through efficacy was marginally significant, B = .03, SE = .02, p = .084 ( H3 ).

The two-way interaction was marginally significant [F (5, 175) = 1.982, p = 0.084, ηp 2 = 0.054].

The difference between over- and undershoot was marginally significant [11.9 vs. -4.7 mm, F (1,11) = 3.60, p = .084, η 2 = .247].

The results demonstrated a significant linear correlation between MBF rest and MBF AS exclusively in control group (r = 0.43, p = 0.009), and a marginally significant linear correlation in ANOCA&MSIMI− group (r = 0.29, p = 0.084).

Furthermore, we found that rs204993 showed marginally significant genotypic ( P = 0.084; OR = 1.561; 95% CI, 0.939–2.596) associations with SCZ in males, but not in females. 4.

The IVW method revealed a marginally significant association (OR = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.99–1.09; p = 0.084) ( Figure 2 ).

Our examination of the mean NIHSS score ( Fig 2C inset) by race showed that Black stroke patients (5.7) had higher scores than the White population (4.7), a variation that was marginally significant ( p = 0.084; Table 4 ).

S1b ), and there was only a marginally significant association between soil distance and geographic distance (see results; r = 0.31, P = 0.084).

Fluent Spanish speakers have significantly better nutritional status across all three measures ( Table 3 ), but a marginally significant interaction term suggests less weight gain at higher parities among more fluent Spanish speakers (β spanish*pace = −3.866, p = 0.084).

There was a marginally significant main effect of order ( F 1 , 148 = 3.036, p = 0.084 , η p 2 = 0.02), such that the participants experiencing the office before school (M = 135.73) had a lower sense of presence than those experiencing the school before office (M = 142.05), perhaps because a school shooting is more psychologically engaging.

Similarly, SES at baseline showed no significant association with tobacco use (β = 0.002, p = 0.522), and the association between age and subsequent tobacco use was marginally significant (β = 0.017, p = 0.084).

There was a marginally significant effect of the interaction between plant species and extinction treatment on parasitoid behavior ( Figure 2 , GLMM, X 3 2 = 6.64 , P = 0.084), indicating that the effect of the extinction treatments may be different on the two plant species used for conditioning.

There was a marginally significant difference in economic status ( P = 0.084), with a higher proportion of patients reporting good economic conditions in the intervention group (81.4% vs 68.1%) ( Table 1 ).