“marginally significant”

A similar, albeit marginally significant, trend was observed among patients with neurologic diseases, where males reported lower satisfaction than females (OR = 0.536, 95% CI [0.265, 1.085], p = 0.083; Table 4 ).

Blood lead levels (BLL) show a marginally significant positive association with mortality (p = 0.083), but ethnicity, geographic location, and living in small metropolitan areas do not have a significant impact.” However, when prompted to interpret regression diagnostics for the CPH model, ChaGPT warns that “The global Schoenfeld residuals test indicates a violation of the proportional hazards assumption for the overall model, with significant issues for covariates such as age, grade, income ratio, ethnicity (non-Hispanic), and race (Black), while the assumption holds for blood lead levels (BLL).

There was a marginally significant difference for V3, F (7, 1) = 4.082, p = 0.083.

The first four smaller samples ( n = 228, 255, 241, 233) yielded mixed results, with a marginally significant main effect for experimental group in Experiment 2a, F (1, 225) = 3.04, P = 0.083, η p 2 = 0.013, a nonsignificant effect for group in Experiment 2b, F (1, 252) = 0.10, P = 0.75, η p 2 = 0.0004, a significant main effect for group in Experiment 2c, F (1, 238) = 5.02, P = 0.026, η p 2 = 0.021, and a nonsignificant effect for group in Experiment 2d, F (1, 230) = 2.67, P = 0.10, η p 2 = 0.011.

In the baseline-adjusted ANCOVA, intervention group differences at week 4 were marginally significant ( p = 0.083), and reached significance ( p = 0.009) after including covariates (BMI, p = 0.008).

For faceplate contact during the CS1 period, we found a significant effect of session ( F 13,260 = 17.372, p < 0.0001) and condition ( F 1,20 = 5.535, p = 0.029), but only a marginally significant effect of sex ( F 1,20 = 3.324, p = 0.083).

However, Eff_N a and latitude showed a marginally significant relationship ( p = .0838, r 2 = .361, deviance explained = 55.3%; Figure S4 ). 3.2 Contemporary rates of gene flow Included in the gene flow analyses were all individuals from Austria (n = 64), Czech Republic ( n = 19), England ( n = 48), France ( n = 124), Georgia ( n = 27), Germany ( n = 108), Italy ( n = 15), Norway ( n = 30), Poland ( n = 29), Scotland ( n = 40), Serbia ( n = 52), Slovakia ( n = 20), Spain ( n = 20), Sweden ( n = 21), and Switzerland ( n = 52).

A significant negative correlation was also found between the DDF score and the functional connectivity between the right insula and right anterior cingulate cortex (T = -2.2412, p = 0.03165, r = -0.3588), and a marginally significant correlation was found between the DDF score and the functional connectivity between the right insula and left anterior cingulate cortex (T = -1.7812, p = 0.08380, r = -0.2922).

The Mann–Whitney U test showed a nonsignificant (marginally significant) difference between dmft scores of boys and girls ( p = 0.084, Figure S2 ). 3.3.

The difference between over- and undershoot was marginally significant [11.9 vs. -4.7 mm, F (1,11) = 3.60, p = .084, η 2 = .247].

Our examination of the mean NIHSS score ( Fig 2C inset) by race showed that Black stroke patients (5.7) had higher scores than the White population (4.7), a variation that was marginally significant ( p = 0.084; Table 4 ).

Moreover, the change in resting-state FC of the hippocampus with DMN dm from the baseline to the immediate test after learning showed a marginally significant correlation with the retention rate in the spaced learning group ( rho = −0.37, p = 0.084) (Fig. 5c ).

Sex, age, CPZeq and categories of the original antipsychotics were entered into the multiple logistic regression model, in which the difference in CPZeq remained significant ( p = 0.030) and the category of original antipsychotics was marginally significant ( p = 0.084).

This trend was statistically significant for the ordinal scale ( p = 0.047) and was marginally significant for the standard visual scale ( p = 0.084).

Although the differences were marginally significant, females spent less time in Iberia ( χ 2 = 2.99, df = 1, p = .084) and crossed the Strait of Gibraltar to Africa earlier than males ( χ 2 = 3.30, df = 1, p = .070).

The univariate analysis (see Supplementary Materials ) showed that the two variables, Vascular Invasion and Cribriform, were significantly associated with survival outcomes ( p < 0.05), while the variable Stage was marginally significant ( p = 0.084).

Specifically, a Mann-Whitney U test on spending rates for those who spent anything across conditions yielded a marginally significant effect (Z = -1.73, p = .084), such that Observers who spent anything to punish a bad Decider tended to spend less than those who spent anything to compensate a good Decider (M Bad Person Injustice = $9.57, M Good Person Injustice = $13.40).

There was a marginally significant main effect of order ( F 1 , 148 = 3.036, p = 0.084 , η p 2 = 0.02), such that the participants experiencing the office before school (M = 135.73) had a lower sense of presence than those experiencing the school before office (M = 142.05), perhaps because a school shooting is more psychologically engaging.

Similarly, SES at baseline showed no significant association with tobacco use (β = 0.002, p = 0.522), and the association between age and subsequent tobacco use was marginally significant (β = 0.017, p = 0.084).

There were marginally significant interactions between perceived Black and White solidarity for the warmth ( b = 0.05, s.e. = 0.03, p = 0.084) and trust ( b = 0.04, s.e. = 0.02, p = 0.079) outcomes which displayed a similar pattern of results (see Supplement, Sect. 9 for simple slope analyses of marginally significant interactions).

The analyses revealed a significant main effect of Text Genre ( F (7.79) = 15.14, p < .001) and a marginally significant main effect of Reading Proficiency ( F (7.79) = 1.88, p = .084).

The predictor “kind” was marginally significant, t (57) = −1.76, p = .084.

Accordingly, all results are robust, except that different perceptions of how “smart” the authors of the AI-generated (versus human-generated) messages were seen to be became non-significant ( p = 0.504) and “unique” became marginally significant ( p = 0.084) and therefore these results are not visualized in Fig. 2 .

fMRI results The mixed ANCOVAs calculated for the subregions of the ACC showed the following results: Spontaneous brain activity in the sgACC showed a significant effect of time ( F (2, 132) = 14.21, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.18), a marginally significant interaction effect between time and group ( F (4, 132) = 2.12, p = 0.084, η p 2 = 0.06), and no main effect of group.

Even though host and environmental features associated with different habitats are thought to influence relic DNA dynamics ( 9 , 20 ), there was only a marginally significant effect of ecosystem type on the proportion of relic DNA (one-way analysis of variance [ANOVA], F 3, 30 = 2.43, P = 0.084), which likely reflected the contrast between soil and water samples (Tukey’s honestly significant difference [HSD], adjusted P = 0.058).