Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.08941.8× alphagold
low learners as described earlier), we noted a marginally significant correlation between ΔCSE rTMS and ΔGeneralization for high‐learners of the cM1 group ( R 2 = 0.406, p = 0.0894) with no significant correlation for low learners ( R 2 = 0.003, p = 0.9049) (see Figure 6C ).
marginally significantp = 0.08971.8× alphagold
It is important to note that the leaf temperature between treated and control plants was marginally significant at (α = 0.10, F = 2.91, df = 1, 174, p = 0.0897), and the Si-treated plants had a consistently lower leaf temperature for the majority of the five weeks we collected data; however, that difference ranged from 0.5–1 °C depending on variety ( Figure 9 ).
marginally significantp = 0.091.8× alphagold
In the age-adjusted multinomial logistic regression model (Aim 1: Table 2 ) examining the association between current drug use and history of MOUD use among the full sample (N = 284), the association between past 30-day heroin/fentanyl use and past MOUD use (ref: never) was marginally significant (aOR = 1.90; 95% CI = 0.90–4.02; p = 0.09), and there was no significant association between past 30-day heroin/fentanyl use and current MOUD use ( p = 0.31).
marginally significantp = 0.0901.8× alphagold
Notably, interest in monogamous reproductive strategies predicts women’s preferences for men’s faces indicating high levels of agreeableness ( Brown et al., 2019 [though note effect was marginally significant, p = 0.090]), and low levels of extraversion ( Brown & Sacco, 2017 ), masculinity ( Kruger, 2006 ) and narcissism ( Marcinkowska et al., 2015 ).
marginally significantP =.091.8× alphagold
A second parental motivation construct, reward, was also rated higher as a reason for allowing screen time by mothers with less education (mean 3.73, SD 1.76) as compared with mothers with high education (mean 3.08, SD 1.66), showing a marginally significant difference of 0.65 (95% CI −0.11 to 1.41; t 84 =1.70; P =.09; Cohen d =0.38; considering a P value of .10).
marginally significantp = 0.091.8× alphagold
Furthermore, there were marginally significant differences in vital exhaustion at pretest ( t (15.72) = −1.77, p = 0.09, d = 0.54) with lower scores for remainders ( M = 4.29, SD = 3.59) versus the dropouts ( M = 6.67, SD = 5.04), but not significant differences in symptoms of depression ( t < 1.00).