“marginally significant”

Physicians that heard of ASD from either the TV or the radio were less knowledgeable about misconceptions regarding ASD than physicians who did not, however this association was marginally significant (AMS: 0.51 vs. 0.62; P = 0.09).

At lag 1, cattle incidence showed a significant negative association with human incidence (estimate = −55.345, p = 0.012), and total animal incidence was also marginally significant (estimate = −17.817, p = 0.090).

Figure 4 part d shows that CHESS+CM had a marginally significant positive effect on information competence at alpha = .079, P = .09; information competence had a positive but nonsignificant effect on ACQ at beta = .063, P = .64.

Post hoc analyses showed that children in the low grade responded more slowly than the children in middle and high grades (ps < 0.05), and children from the middle grade exhibited longer reaction times than the ones in the high grades (p = 0.09, marginally significant).

The results of these tests revealed that only appearance effects were significant for the expressive ( F 1,91 =5.9; P =.03), useful ( F 1,91 =13.75; P <.001), durable ( F 1,91 =3.83; P =.05), and smooth ( F 1,91 =23.78; P <.001) subscales, marginally significant for the graceful subscale ( P =.09) but not significant for the controllable subscale.

Specifically, compared with the unchanged group, the users in the personalized-by-you group showed a marginally significant increase ( P =.09), while the users in the personalized-by-the-algorithm group showed a significant increase ( P =.02).

The same ANOVA also yielded marginally significant effects of continuum type [ F (1, 9) = 3.90, MSE = 897, p < 0.09] and a vowel duration × continuum type interaction [ F (5, 45) = 2.24, MSE = 2070, p < 0.07].

However, a marginally significant positive correlation between arbuscular colonization rates and total biomass was detected for soybean in the biota soils ( p = 0.09; Figure 5b ).

Unlike RT for the reversals, a marginally significant sex × test type interaction was found ( F (1,14) = 3.33, p = 0.09, partial η 2 = 0.19).

Also, the level of this variable in the combined group was more than that in the GSC group and marginally significant: (OR = -0.09, 95% CI: -0.67-9.30, P = 0.090) ( Figure 2 ).

A follow-up analysis examining the effects of APOE4 on pain unpleasantness adjusting for differences in stimulus intensity at each percept level across genetic groups indicated that the pattern of results was little changed, with the APOE4 main effect becoming marginally significant ( p < 0.09) but the overall effect size increasing slightly (from d = 0.26 to d = 0.33).

More specifically, the contrast was marginally significant at 3 versus 18 months (X 2 (1) = 2.88, p = 0.09), and significant in the 9 to 18 months’ contrast (X 2 (1) = 6.6, p = 0.01), with higher values of voiced segments per second for fathers, see Fig. 1 b.

The mean acceptability among parents who strongly agreed that they intended to use the app in the next 2 weeks (17/34, 50%) was 13.41 compared with 12.41 among parents who did not strongly agree (17/34, 50%), a difference that was marginally significant at P =.09 (95% CI 2.15 to 0.15).

For the latency of P1, an identical ANOVA revealed a marginally significant main effect of load ( F (1,11) = 3.4, p = 0.09) with delayed latency for high vs. low loads, and a significant main effect of emotion ( F (2,10) = 4.99, p < 0.05).

In multivariable analysis, higher NGON prevalence remained to be associated with larger beta/gamma size (OR = 4.18, 95% CI = 1.62–10.8, P = 0.003) and marginally significant with longer axial length (OR = 2.08, 95% CI = 0.90–4.81, P = 0.09).

We also saw a marginally significant two-way interaction of instrument and musical experience, β = 0.36, z = 5.61, p < .09: planned contrasts revealed that, whereas marimba was rated as significantly happier than viola by both musicians and nonmusicians, the difference in happy/sad ratings between viola and marimba was greater in the case of nonmusicians than musicians, t = 4.450, p < .0001.

While improvements in cold-related symptoms among the SBHE school children were marginally significant (−0.05 SD [−0.10, −0.01], p = 0.09), the overall trends indicated general improvement in health as well as healthy behaviours across all schools, irrespective of treatment status.

There was a marginally significant effect of action-congruency, F (1, 15) = 3.41, p = .09; η 2 = .19; and no significant effect of movement-congruency, F (1, 15) = .02, p = .90; η 2 = .00.

A marginally significant main effect of age emerged, F (1,56) = 2.95, p = 0.09.

tsugae beginning with Instar 2, and was marginally significant at α = 0.10 for the pupal and adult stages (χ 2 = 2.72, df = 1, p = 0.09).

Indeed, we examined the correlation analysis between cycling performance (i.e., mean and peak power in 10-second sprint cycling) and urinary 8-OHdG, and we found that the relationships between these exercise performances and the oxidative damage were marginally significant, respectively (mean power: r = –0.44, P = 0.09; peak power: r = –0.49, P = 0.06).

The independent Mann-Whitney U -test of task performance data (accuracy and RT) revealed marginally significant difference ( p = 0.090 and 0.068), with a bit lower accuracy and longer reaction time in MCI patients.

However, the age distribution of accurately diagnosed obese children differed significantly across age categories ( p = 0.002), and a marginally significant difference in age distribution was observed for children accurately diagnosed with FTT ( p = 0.09).

The interaction between subgroups was marginally significant (interaction P = 0.09, I2 = 64.7%; Figure 3A ).

The mean reaction time in the test of visual rapid simultaneous processing was negatively correlated with the reading speed in both oral [ r = -0.29, p = 0.09, marginally significant] and silent [ r = -0.45, p = 0.001] modes, where shorter reaction time for visual rapid simultaneous processing corresponded to higher speed of reading.